Fabri, Honoré
,
Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur
,
1665
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 248
>
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 248
>
page
|<
<
of 248
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002613
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
216
"
xlink:href
="
025/01/230.jpg
"/>
quia cognoſcitur locus, tum Solis, tum Iovis; habentur igitur alia late
<
lb
/>
ra trianguli; habetur igitur DK, radius Epicycli Mediceæ ; hæc autem
<
lb
/>
maximæ digreſſionis menſura vulgò ponitur : ſed profectò fallit; quia
<
lb
/>
cum bis ac tertiò obſervarim quartam Mediceam emergentem, & accura
<
lb
/>
tè meritus fuerim illius diſtantiam, eo temporis momento, à centro Iovis,
<
lb
/>
puta MD, certè DK longè minor evaſit, quam DF ; hic ergo modus, vt
<
lb
/>
fallax, rejiciendus eſt. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.002614
">Sextò, Rectè autem deduco, Mediceam non moveri in circulo circa
<
lb
/>
Iovem, non modò ex ſpatiis æqualibus, diurno motu confectis à Medi
<
lb
/>
cea, in recta FG, ſi enim ex Apogæo G, per Quadrantem circuli GPE,
<
lb
/>
<
figure
id
="
id.025.01.230.1.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
025/01/230/1.jpg
"
number
="
79
"/>
<
lb
/>
ire ſupponatur, aſſumptis arcubus æqualibus GMPRE, ductiſque re
<
lb
/>
ctis MZ, PY, RV parallelis GA, videbitur decurrere ſpatia AZYVE
<
lb
/>
omnino inæqualia: ſed æqualibus temporibus æqualia decurrere vide
<
lb
/>
tur; igitur non modo ex ſpatiis æqualibus, æquali tempore, in recta per
<
lb
/>
centrum Iovis eunte, à Medicea decurſis, deduco, illam non moveri in
<
lb
/>
circulo circa Iovem, ſed etiam ex eo quod, primùm emergens minùs di
<
lb
/>
ſtet à centro Iovis, quàm diſtare deberet, cùm enim diſtantia Iovis
<
lb
/>
à terra ſit ferè quintupla diſtantiæ Solis, ac proinde angulus maxi
<
lb
/>
mæ Proſthaphæreſeos ſit ferè 11. grad. min. 32. Sit centrum Iovis A,
<
lb
/>
maxima digreſſio quartæ Mediceæ AE. 11. circiter Diametrorum Iovis,
<
lb
/>
vt mihi conſtat ex multis obſervationibus, ſit Quadrans ortivus Epiclyci
<
lb
/>
GE, & Apogæum G, ſit angulus GAK 11. grad.min. 32. ſit BA Semi
<
lb
/>
diameter Iovis, ducatur BL parallela AK, item NS, ſectio vmbræ pro
<
lb
/>
jectæ erit Parallelogramma NL, diſtante Sole versùs occaſum grad. 78.
<
lb
/>
min. 28. in quo puncto angulus Proſthaphæreſeos eſt 11. grad. min. 32.
<
lb
/>
igitur in L eſt punctum emerſionis quartæ Mediceæ ; demittatur LD, Me
<
lb
/>
dicea primùm emergens videbitur in D ; continet autem DA Diametros
<
lb
/>
Iovis 2
<
gap
/>
. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.002615
">Sed contrarium, repetitis obſervationibus, comperi, ſcilicet quar
<
lb
/>
tam Mediceam primùm emergentem ex vmbra projecta, à Iovis centro viæ
<
lb
/>
diſtare duabus integris Diametris. </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>