Gassendi, Pierre
,
De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur
,
1646
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
>
Scan
Original
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
>
page
|<
<
of 360
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001583
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
203
"
xlink:href
="
028/01/243.jpg
"/>
octo ſequentibus: ſextum, quod ſexdecim ſuccedenti
<
lb
/>
bus, atque ita porrò. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001584
">Ego itaque oſtenſurus, vt hæc ſe
<
lb
/>
probè non haberent, cætera inter argumenta, rem ex
<
lb
/>
primendam numeris cenſui, ac aſſumpſi
<
expan
abbr
="
primũ
">primum</
expan
>
ipſum
<
lb
/>
tempus, quod dimidio illi poſteriori attribueres, veluti
<
lb
/>
aſſem, eiuſque proinde parteis duodecim quaſi vncias,
<
lb
/>
ſiue mauis minuta habui. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001585
">Debueras tu procedere dein
<
lb
/>
ceps per parteis æqualeis huic dimidio: quo caſu ſe
<
lb
/>
cundæ parti fuiſſent attributa minuta ſex, ſiue
<
expan
abbr
="
dimidiũ
">dimidium</
expan
>
<
lb
/>
<
expan
abbr
="
tẽporis
">temporis</
expan
>
(ob duplicatam velocitatem) & tertiæ quatuor,
<
lb
/>
ſiue triens (ob triplicatam) & quartæ tria, ſiue quadrans
<
lb
/>
(ob quadruplicatam) &c. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001586
">& quia tamen duplum di
<
lb
/>
midij vſurpandum eſſe vbique cenſuiſti, vt partes ſe
<
lb
/>
cunda, tertia, quarta, &c. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001587
">fierent vbique toti primæ
<
lb
/>
æquales: ideò effectum eſt, vt ſecundæ parti non dimi
<
lb
/>
dium, ſeu ſex minuta, ſed omninò tantumdem, ſeu duo
<
lb
/>
decim tribueris, & tertiæ beſſem, ſiue octo: quartæ di
<
lb
/>
midium, ſiue ſex. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001588
">Ipſe proinde, vtcumque rationem
<
lb
/>
dupli prætermiſerim (& quam tamen iam interſeren
<
lb
/>
dam cenſui) declarare volui, vt hæc tempora non con
<
lb
/>
gruerent ſpatiis vtravis ratione aſsuptis. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001589
">Et de ſecundo
<
lb
/>
<
expan
abbr
="
quidẽ
">quidem</
expan
>
conſtitit, ob illud, quod duplicato quidem con
<
lb
/>
ueniret tempus primo æquale, ſeu minutorum duode
<
lb
/>
cim, at ſimplici non niſi dimidium, ſeu minuta ſex: de
<
lb
/>
fuccedentibus autem iuxta aggregationem tuam, ob id,
<
lb
/>
quòd neque ſimplicibus, neque duplicibus conueniret
<
lb
/>
vnquam tempus æquale primo, ſeu minutorum duo
<
lb
/>
decim, ſed vel in ſimplicibus ſemper deficeret, vel in
<
lb
/>
duplicibus ſemper abundaret: cùm deberet tamen ſal
<
lb
/>
tem in duplicibus ſemper exæquari, vt exæquatum </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>