Guevara, Giovanni di
,
In Aristotelis mechanicas commentarii
,
1627
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Table of figures
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 84
[out of range]
>
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 84
[out of range]
>
page
|<
<
of 303
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
id
="
N10019
">
<
p
id
="
N17071
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N17073
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
239
"
xlink:href
="
005/01/247.jpg
"/>
vectis, ita vt idem lignum AB rationem ſubeat vtriuſque
<
lb
/>
vectis, vnius nempe per quem geſtans in A prematur ad
<
lb
/>
motum geſtantis in B: alterius verò per quem geſtans in
<
lb
/>
B, prematur ad motum geſtantis in A, eodem ſemper exi
<
lb
/>
ſtente fulcimento D. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N17086
">Siquidem ambo geſtantes eleuare
<
lb
/>
conantur ſua extrema, & ambo deprimuntur adinuicem,
<
lb
/>
ita vt alter alteri conſtituatur onus, ac mouens potentia; li
<
lb
/>
cet ille magis moueat, minuſque grauetur, qui longius diſtat
<
lb
/>
à fulcimento. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N17091
">Quæ profectò explicatio à mente Ariſtotelise
<
lb
/>
tradita doctrina non abhorret, imò maximè congruit cum
<
lb
/>
eo, quod ipſemet Philoſophus tandem adiecit: Nimirum
<
lb
/>
quòd ſi pondus in medio vectis conſtitueretur, non magis
<
lb
/>
vnus, quam alter baiulus grauaretur; atque moueret; ſed
<
lb
/>
eodem pacto alter alteri eſſet onus, & potentia. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N1709E
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N170A0
">Baldus verò eandem Piccolominei expoſitionem appro
<
lb
/>
bando doctrinam Ariſtotelis à qua illa deſumpta eſt, & cui
<
lb
/>
omnino congruit, reprobat, rationem fulcimenti in ipſo
<
lb
/>
pondere conſideratam,
<
expan
abbr
="
figmentũ
">figmentum</
expan
>
vocans Ariſtotelis. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N170AE
">Qua
<
lb
/>
propter geſtatum pondus, ait verè eſſe pondus, lignum ve
<
lb
/>
rò vectem, ac duos qui pondus ſuſtinent in ipſius ligni ex
<
lb
/>
tremi pro duplici fulcimento haberi. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N170B7
">Non tamen apparet
<
lb
/>
quo fundamento lignum prædictum, vectis dici poſſit, ſi
<
lb
/>
duobus fulcimentis ponatur innixum; cum tota ratio vectis
<
lb
/>
ad libram, ac circulum referatur, quibus non niſi vnum eſſe
<
lb
/>
poteſt centrum ac fulcimentum circa quod conuertantur.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
N170C3
">Rectè autem ſubiungit poſſe alterum eorum, ſcilicet aſpor
<
lb
/>
tantium pro potentia mouente, alterum pro fulcimento ha
<
lb
/>
beri, & ſic viciſsim, ita vt pondus ſit inter
<
expan
abbr
="
fulcimentũ
">fulcimentum</
expan
>
, & po
<
lb
/>
tentiam. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N170D0
">Nam hoc pacto præfatum lignum conſtitueretur
<
lb
/>
vectis eius generis, quod fulturam habet in altero extremo,
<
lb
/>
vt 1. par. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N170D7
">tex. vltimo, Addit. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N170DC
">1. explicuimus. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N170DF
">Nihil enim pro
<
lb
/>
hibet idem lignum ſecundum diuerſas conſiderationes
<
lb
/>
adhuc in diuerſo genere vectis conſtitui. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N170E6
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N170E8
">Ad hæc idem Baldus affines quaſdam huic dubitationes,
<
lb
/>
<
expan
abbr
="
eanumq.
">eanumque</
expan
>
ſolutiones ſubnectit, quarum illa præcipuè ad rem
<
lb
/>
facit; Num ſcilicet pondere in vectis medio conſtituto, </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>