Borro, Girolamo, De motu gravium et levium, 1575

List of thumbnails

< >
241
241
242
242
243
243
244
244
245
245
246
246
247
247
248
248
249
249
250
250
< >
page |< < of 316 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <subchap1>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="s.001626">
                  <pb pagenum="238" xlink:href="011/01/258.jpg"/>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                eſt eiuſdem rationis: at aquæ pars in nobis, & in quolibet ani
                  <lb/>
                mante est animata: ergo & totum aquæ elementum est in
                  <lb/>
                ſe ipſo animatum; idque de cæteris tribus elementis Thales
                  <lb/>
                Mileſius credendum eſſe cenſuit, quod de aqua credidit.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="s.001627">
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                Elementorum contra Platonem, & Thaletem nullas eſſe
                  <lb/>
                animas facilè intelliget is, qui animæ definitionem secundo de
                  <lb/>
                anima ab Ariſtotele
                  <expan abbr="diſputatã">diſputatam</expan>
                ad veritatis trutinam expen­
                  <lb/>
                dere voluerit. </s>
                <s id="s.001628">Eſt, enim anima actus corporis non cuiuſuis sed
                  <lb/>
                instrumentarij, quæ instrumenta non ſunt in elementis: ideo
                  <lb/>
                nullæ erit elementorum anima. </s>
                <s id="s.001629">Præterea ſi elementa
                  <expan abbr="animã">animam</expan>
                  <lb/>
                habere dicuntur, cur animantia non ſunt? </s>
                <s id="s.001630">& ſi animantia
                  <lb/>
                non ſunt, cur animam habent? </s>
                <s id="s.001631">& ſi anima est in elementis,
                  <lb/>
                cur nullæ partium animæ in illis inueniuntur? </s>
                <s id="s.001632">non vegetandi,
                  <lb/>
                quoniam non augentur, non minuuntur, non aluntur, non ſi­
                  <lb/>
                mile gignunt. </s>
                <s id="s.001633">Non ſentiendi, quia à qualitatibus primis, quæ
                  <lb/>
                ſummæ ſunt in illis, non afficiuntur, quæ ad ſenſum tangendi
                  <lb/>
                pertinent, ſine quo omnium primo nullus alius poſterior eſſe
                  <lb/>
                potest. </s>
                <s id="s.001634">Non intelligendi, quia elementa eſſent, aut homines,
                  <lb/>
                aut Dij. </s>
                <s id="s.001635">Non ex loco ad locum mouendi,
                  <expan abbr="">cum</expan>
                pedibus careant,
                  <lb/>
                & aliis instrumentis, quæ pedum loco animantibus natur a
                  <lb/>
                dedit, ſine quibus animantia ad locum moueri non queunt.
                  <lb/>
                </s>
                <s id="s.001636">Elementa ergo animata eſſe non poſſunt. </s>
                <s id="s.001637">Ad argumentum
                  <lb/>
                Thaletis reſpondeo: dicimus, aquam in nobis non eſſe anima­
                  <lb/>
                tam, nec alia pars cuiuſuis elementi; quapropter nec totum
                  <lb/>
                elementum animatum erit, sed in nobis animatum eſt id, quod
                  <lb/>
                eſt ex
                  <expan abbr="omniũ">omnium</expan>
                  <expan abbr="elementorũ">elementorum</expan>
                mixtione
                  <expan abbr="concretũ">concretum</expan>
                ; hæc ad
                  <expan abbr="materiã">materiam</expan>
                .
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="s.001638">
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                Ad formam totum primum argumentum damus, & an
                  <lb/>
                tecedens ſecundi argumenti negamus. </s>
                <s id="s.001639">Argumentum, quod
                  <lb/>
                Platonici addunt, dum dicunt: hanc animam mundi non vi­
                  <lb/>
                deri; nec propter hanc cauſam eſſe negandam, nullius est ro-
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>