Fabri, Honoré, Tractatus physicus de motu locali, 1646

Page concordance

< >
< >
page |< < of 491 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap id="N1C940">
            <p id="N1E61A" type="main">
              <s id="N1E62D">
                <pb pagenum="226" xlink:href="026/01/258.jpg"/>
              cauimus; nam idem deſtruitur in dato puncto aſcenſus, qui producere­
                <lb/>
              tur in eodem puncto deſcenſus. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1E638" type="main">
              <s id="N1E63A">Dices, gradus productus vltimo inſtanti deſcenſus non deſtruitur pri­
                <lb/>
              mo aſcenſus. </s>
              <s id="N1E63F">Reſpondeo deſtrui; </s>
              <s id="N1E643">hinc eadem cauſa idem deſtruit primo
                <lb/>
              inſtanti aſcenſus quod produxit vltimo inſtanti deſcenſus; deſtruit in­
                <lb/>
              quam mediatè. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1E64B" type="main">
              <s id="N1E64D">Hîc obſeruabis ſingulare diſcrimen, quod intercedit inter cauſam
                <lb/>
              producentem, & exigentem; </s>
              <s id="N1E653">nam producens verè agit, exigens verò tan­
                <lb/>
              tùm exigit; </s>
              <s id="N1E659">illa conſequitur effectum eo inſtanti quo agit; </s>
              <s id="N1E65D">hæc verò non
                <lb/>
              habet effectum eo inſtanti, quo exigit, ſed pro ſequenti; </s>
              <s id="N1E663">eſt tamen cauſa
                <lb/>
              eo inſtanti, quo exigit, non certè agens, ſed exigens: </s>
              <s id="N1E669">exemplum habes
                <lb/>
              in impetu, qui non habet motum eo inſtanti quo exigit, ſed tantùm ſe­
                <lb/>
              quenti pro quo exigit; </s>
              <s id="N1E671">igitur eſt cauſa motus antequàm ſit motus, non
                <lb/>
              agens ſed exigens; at verò cum impetus alium impetum producit eſt
                <lb/>
              tantùm cauſa illius cum agit. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1E679" type="main">
              <s id="N1E67B">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              82.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1E687" type="main">
              <s id="N1E689">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Vltimo inſtanti aſcenſus ſunt duo gradus impetus, ſcilicet productus primo
                <lb/>
              inſtanti deſcenſus cum innato
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; </s>
              <s id="N1E694">igitur inſtanti ſequenti erit motus, id eſt,
                <lb/>
              deſcenſus, quia præualet innatus qui perfectior eſt, vt conſtat ex dictis; </s>
              <s id="N1E69A">
                <lb/>
              igitur nullum erit inſtans quietis; quæ omnia explicari debent eodem
                <lb/>
              modo, quo iam explicuimus in motu violento, lib.3. eſt enim eadem ra­
                <lb/>
              tio, &c. </s>
              <s id="N1E6A3">quæ omitto ne multa hîc repetere cogar. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1E6A6" type="main">
              <s id="N1E6A8">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              83.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1E6B4" type="main">
              <s id="N1E6B6">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Ictus eſſent ferè æquales in ſegmentis æqualibus aſcenſus & deſcenſus,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              quia
                <lb/>
              motus eſſet æqualis in illis; igitur ictus æquales, quod facilè eſt. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1E6C1" type="main">
              <s id="N1E6C3">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              84.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1E6CF" type="main">
              <s id="N1E6D1">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              In planis eiuſdem inclinationis idem corpus graue eſt eiuſdem ponderis
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              v.
                <lb/>
              g. ſint plana FE. GD. HO eiuſdem inclinationis cum communi ſci­
                <lb/>
              licet perpendiculo ODEA; </s>
              <s id="N1E6E1">certè pondus corporis in O eſt ad pondus
                <lb/>
              eiuſdem in H vt AH ad AO per Th.57. & pondus corporis eiuſdem in
                <lb/>
              D eſt ad pondus eiuſdem in G vt AG ad AD, & in E vt AF ad AE; </s>
              <s id="N1E6E9">
                <lb/>
              ſed AF eſt ad AE vt AG ad AD, vt AH ad AO; ſunt enim triangula
                <lb/>
              proportionalia. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1E6F0" type="main">
              <s id="N1E6F2">Hinc reiice quorumdam recentiorum ſententiam, qui volunt corpus,
                <lb/>
              quod propiùs ad centrum terræ accedit, eſſe minùs graue, & grauius quod
                <lb/>
              longiùs à centro recedit, quod de grauitate corporis abſolutè ſumpti nul­
                <lb/>
              latenus dici poteſt vt conſtat, vtrum verò ſi cum alio in eadem libra ſta­
                <lb/>
              tuatur hinc inde, videbimus ſuo loco. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1E6FD" type="main">
              <s id="N1E6FF">Diceret fortè aliquis in ipſo centro ſpoliari ſua tota grauitate; </s>
              <s id="N1E703">igitur
                <lb/>
              quo propiùs accedit ad centrum maiori grauitatis portione multatur; </s>
              <s id="N1E709">ſed
                <lb/>
              nego conſequentiam; </s>
              <s id="N1E70F">nec enim ſequitur priuari parte grauitatis dum
                <lb/>
              abeſt à centro, licèt tota priuetur cum eſt in centro ſed de hac quæſtione
                <lb/>
              plura aliàs; nec enim huius loci eſt. </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>