Alberti, Leone Battista
,
Architecture
,
1755
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 320
>
Scan
Original
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 320
>
page
|<
<
of 320
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
003/01/026.jpg
"
pagenum
="
15
"/>
but alſo pleaſant to the Sight. </
s
>
<
s
>Nature at firſt
<
lb
/>
certainly gave us Columns made of Wood,
<
lb
/>
and of a round Figure, afterwards by Uſe they
<
lb
/>
came in ſome Places to be cut ſquare. </
s
>
<
s
>There
<
lb
/>
upon, if I judge right, ſeeing in theſe wooden
<
lb
/>
Columns certain Rings of Circles of Braſs or
<
lb
/>
Iron, faſten'd about the Top and Bottom, that
<
lb
/>
the continual Weight which they are made to
<
lb
/>
bear, might not ſplit them; the Architects too
<
lb
/>
left at the Foot of their Columns of Marble, a
<
lb
/>
little Ring like a ſort of Binding; whereby
<
lb
/>
they are defended from any Drops of Rain that
<
lb
/>
might daſh up again upon them. </
s
>
<
s
>And at the
<
lb
/>
Top too they left another little Band, and over
<
lb
/>
that an Aſtragal or Collar; with which helps
<
lb
/>
they obſerv'd the Columns of Wood to be
<
lb
/>
fortified. </
s
>
<
s
>In the Baſes of their Columns it
<
lb
/>
was their Rule, that the under Part ſhould
<
lb
/>
conſiſt of ſtrait Lines and right Angles, but
<
lb
/>
that their upper Superficies ſhould terminate
<
lb
/>
circularly to anſwer to the Round of the Pil
<
lb
/>
lar; and they made this Baſe on every Side
<
lb
/>
broader than high, and wider than the Column
<
lb
/>
by a determinate Part of itſelf; and the under
<
lb
/>
Superficies of the Baſe they made broader than
<
lb
/>
the upper; the Plinth too they would have a
<
lb
/>
certain Proportion broader than the Baſe, and
<
lb
/>
the Foundation again a determinate Part wider
<
lb
/>
than the Plinth. </
s
>
<
s
>And all theſe Parts thus
<
lb
/>
placed one upon the other, they erected per
<
lb
/>
pendicular from the Center of the Foundation.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>On the other hand, the Capitals all agree in
<
lb
/>
this, that their under Parts imitate their
<
lb
/>
Columns, but their upper End in a Square;
<
lb
/>
and conſequently the upper Part of the Capital
<
lb
/>
muſt always be ſomewhat broader than the
<
lb
/>
under. </
s
>
<
s
>This may ſuffice here as to the
<
lb
/>
Columns. </
s
>
<
s
>The Wall ought to be raiſed with
<
lb
/>
the ſame Proportions as the Columns; ſo that
<
lb
/>
if it is to be as high as the Column and its Ca
<
lb
/>
pital, its Thickneſs ought to be the ſame with
<
lb
/>
that of the bottom of the Column. </
s
>
<
s
>And they
<
lb
/>
alſo obſerved this Rule, that there ſhou'd be
<
lb
/>
neither Pillar, nor Baſe, nor Capital, nor Wall,
<
lb
/>
but what ſhould in all reſpects correſpond with
<
lb
/>
every thing elſe of the ſame Order, in Heighth,
<
lb
/>
Thickneſs, Form and Dimenſion. </
s
>
<
s
>But tho' both
<
lb
/>
are Faults, either to make the Wall too thin
<
lb
/>
or too thick, higher or lower than the Rule
<
lb
/>
and Proportion requires; yet of the two I
<
lb
/>
wou'd chuſe to offend on that Side, where we
<
lb
/>
ſhou'd have occaſion to take away rather than
<
lb
/>
to add. </
s
>
<
s
>And here I think it will not be amiſs
<
lb
/>
to take notice of ſome Errors in Buildings,
<
lb
/>
that we our ſelves may be the more circum
<
lb
/>
ſpect: in as much as the chief Praiſe is to be
<
lb
/>
exempt from Blame. </
s
>
<
s
>I have obſerved there
<
lb
/>
fore in St.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Peter
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
's Church at
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Rome
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
what indeed
<
lb
/>
the thing itſelf demonſtrates, that it was ill ad
<
lb
/>
viſed to draw a very long and thick Wall over
<
lb
/>
ſo many frequent and continued Apertures,
<
lb
/>
without ſtrength'ning it with any curve Lines
<
lb
/>
or any other Fortification whatſoever. </
s
>
<
s
>And
<
lb
/>
what more deſerves our Notice, all this Wing
<
lb
/>
of Wall, under which are too frequent and
<
lb
/>
continued Apertures, and which is raiſed to a
<
lb
/>
great Heighth, is expoſed as a Butt to the im
<
lb
/>
petuous Blaſts of the North-Eaſt: by which
<
lb
/>
means already thro' the continual Violence of
<
lb
/>
the Winds it is ſwerved from its Direction
<
lb
/>
above two Yards: and I doubt not that in a
<
lb
/>
ſhort time, ſome little accidental ſhock will
<
lb
/>
throw it down into Ruins; and if it were not
<
lb
/>
kept in by the Timber Frame of the Roof, it
<
lb
/>
muſt infallibly have fallen down before now.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>But the Architect may not be ſo much in
<
lb
/>
Fault, becauſe conſulting only the Neceſſity of
<
lb
/>
his Situation, he might perhaps imagine that
<
lb
/>
the Neighbourhood of the Mountain, which
<
lb
/>
overlooks the Church, might be a ſufficient
<
lb
/>
Shelter againſt the Winds. </
s
>
<
s
>Nevertheleſs it is
<
lb
/>
certain, thoſe Wings ought to have been more
<
lb
/>
ſtrengthned on both Sides.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
head
">
<
s
>CHAP. XI.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Of the great Uſefulneſs of the Coverings both to the Inhabitants and the other
<
lb
/>
Parts of the Building, and that being various in their Natures, they muſt be
<
lb
/>
made of various Sorts.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>The Covering for Uſefulneſs far exceeds
<
lb
/>
any other Part of the Building. </
s
>
<
s
>It
<
lb
/>
not only ſecures the Health of the Inhabitants
<
lb
/>
by defending them from the Night, from the
<
lb
/>
Rain, and eſpecially from the burning Rays of
<
lb
/>
the Sun; but it alſo preſerves all the reſt of the
<
lb
/>
Edifice. </
s
>
<
s
>Take away the Covering and the
<
lb
/>
Materials rot, the Wall moulders and ſplits, </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>