Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/260.jpg
"
pagenum
="
242
"/>
caſe, which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernicus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
alledgeth, that by reaſon this motion is
<
lb
/>
natural to the Earth and not violent, it worketh contrary effects
<
lb
/>
to violent motions; and that thoſe things diſſolve and cannot
<
lb
/>
long ſubſiſt, to which impulſe is conferred, but thoſe ſo made
<
lb
/>
by nature do continue in their perfect diſpoſure; this anſwer
<
lb
/>
ficeth not, I ſay, for it is overthrown by that of ours. </
s
>
<
s
>For the
<
lb
/>
nimal is a natural body, and not made by art, and its motion is
<
lb
/>
natural, deriving it ſelf from the ſoul, that is, from an intrinſick
<
lb
/>
principle; and that motion is violent, whoſe beginning is
<
lb
/>
out, and on which the thing moved conferreth nothing;
<
lb
/>
ever, if the animal continueth its motion any long time, it grows
<
lb
/>
weary, and alſo dyeth, if it obſtinately ſtrive to perſiſt therein.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>You ſee then that in nature we meet on all ſides with notions
<
lb
/>
trary to the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernican Hypotheſis,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and none in favour of it. </
s
>
<
s
>And
<
lb
/>
for that I have nothing more wherein to take the part of this
<
lb
/>
ponent, hear what he produceth againſt
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Keplerus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(with whom
<
lb
/>
he diſputeth) upon that argument, which the ſaid
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Kepler
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
bringeth
<
lb
/>
againſt thoſe who think it an inconvenient, nay impoſſible thing,
<
lb
/>
to augment the Starry Sphere immenſely, as the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernican
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
potheſis requireth.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Kepler
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
therefore inſtanceth, ſaying:
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
us ect, accidens præter modulum ſubjecti intendere, quàm ſub-
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg489
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
jectum ſine accidente augere. </
s
>
<
s
>Copernicus ergo veriſimilius facit,
<
lb
/>
qui auget Orbem Stellarum fixarum abſque motu, quam Ptolomæus,
<
lb
/>
qui auget motum fixarum immenſà velocitate.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
[Which makes this
<
lb
/>
Engliſh.] Its harder to ſtretch the accident beyond the model of the
<
lb
/>
ſubject than to augment the ſubject without the accident.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Coperni-
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
hath more probability on his ſide, who encreaſeth the Orb of the
<
lb
/>
fixed Stars without motion, than
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ptolomy
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
who augmenteth the
<
lb
/>
motion of the fixed Stars to an immenſe degree of velocity.
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg490
"/>
<
lb
/>
Which objection the Author anſwereth, wondering how much
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Kepler
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
deceived himſelf, in ſaying, that in the Ptolomaick
<
lb
/>
ſis the motion encreaſeth beyond the model of the ſubject, for in
<
lb
/>
his judgment it doth not encreaſe, ſave onely in conformity to the
<
lb
/>
model, and that according to its encreaſement, the velocity of
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg491
"/>
<
lb
/>
the motion is augmented. </
s
>
<
s
>Which he proveth by ſuppoſing a
<
lb
/>
chine to be framed, that maketh one revolution in twenty four
<
lb
/>
hours, which motion ſhall be called moſt ſlow; afterwards
<
lb
/>
poſing its ſemidiameter to be prolonged, as far as to the diſtance
<
lb
/>
of the Sun, its extreme will equal the velocity of the Sun; and
<
lb
/>
it being cantinued out unto the Starry Sphere, it will equal the
<
lb
/>
velocity of the fixed Stars, though in the circumferrnce of the
<
lb
/>
machine it be very ſlow. </
s
>
<
s
>Now applying this conſideration of the
<
lb
/>
machine to the Starry Sphere, let us imagine any point in its
<
lb
/>
midiameter, as neer to the centre as is the ſemidiameter of the
<
lb
/>
chine; the ſame motion that in the Starry Sphere is exceeding </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>