Guevara, Giovanni di, In Aristotelis mechanicas commentarii, 1627

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
< >
page |< < of 303 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap id="N10019">
            <p id="N17660" type="main">
              <s id="N17674">
                <pb pagenum="252" xlink:href="005/01/260.jpg"/>
              iſtuc quàm illuc; determinatur autem à cauſa impellente
                <lb/>
              per modum quo applicatur, ac iuxta poſitionem qua vrget,
                <lb/>
              ac diligit mobile in ipſa impulſione. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N17684" type="main">
              <s id="N17686">Cæterum ex dictis in hac quæſtione colligitur, non eſſe
                <lb/>
              eandem rationem de maiori facilitate motus violenti, ac
                <lb/>
              naturalis poſt principium motus; cum maior facilitas, quæ
                <lb/>
              reperitur in violenta motione corporis iam commoti, oria­
                <lb/>
              tur ex reduplicatione illa impetus explicata: maior autem
                <lb/>
              facilitas, ac velocitas motus naturalis
                <expan abbr="poſtquã">poſtquam</expan>
              corpus mo­
                <lb/>
              ueri cœperit in ſolum
                <expan abbr="locũ">locum</expan>
              , procedat ab impetu aduenien­
                <lb/>
              te vltra grauitatem, aut leuitatem, qui adhuc ſucceſſiuè in­
                <lb/>
              tenditur,
                <expan abbr="promouetq.">promouetque</expan>
              magis ac magis vſque in
                <expan abbr="finẽ">finem</expan>
              . </s>
              <s id="N176AB">Quam­
                <lb/>
              obrem abſque fundamento nonnulli oppoſitum putantes,
                <lb/>
              aiunt eandem eſſe vtrique motui facilitatis, ac velocitatis
                <lb/>
              rationem,
                <expan abbr="eamq.">eamque</expan>
              conſiſtere in diſpoſitione prioris motus,
                <lb/>
              quo diſponatur ſubiectum ad motum poſteriorem: cum
                <lb/>
              nec motus, nec alia actio per ſe diſponere valeat ſubiectum
                <lb/>
              abſque formæ alicuius productione; nec vlla forma produ­
                <lb/>
              ci poſſit per motum localem præter: præſentiam ipſam lo­
                <lb/>
              calem, quæ ad nihil diſponit. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N176C2" type="head">
              <s id="N176C4">Quæſtio Trigeſimaſecunda.</s>
            </p>
            <p id="N176C7" type="main">
              <s id="N176C9">C
                <emph type="italics"/>
              vr ea quæ proijciuntur, ceſſant à latione?
                <lb/>
              </s>
              <s id="N176D0">An quia impellens deſinit potentia, vel pro­
                <lb/>
              pter retractionem, vel propter rei proiectæ in­
                <lb/>
              clinarionem, quando ea valentior fuerit,
                <lb/>
              quàm pro<03>cientis vires. </s>
              <s id="N176D9">Aut isthæc ambi­
                <lb/>
              gere, principium relinquentes, abſurdum eſt.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N176E0" type="head">
              <s id="N176E2">COMMENTARIVS.</s>
            </p>
            <p id="N176E6" type="main">
              <s id="N176E8">De motu proiectorum ſermonem inſtituens Ariſto­
                <lb/>
              teles inuerſo ordine videtur procedere dum prius
                <lb/>
              hic quærit cur illa ceſſent à latione, deinde verò in </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum