Guevara, Giovanni di
,
In Aristotelis mechanicas commentarii
,
1627
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
page
|<
<
of 303
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
id
="
N10019
">
<
p
id
="
N17660
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N17674
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
252
"
xlink:href
="
005/01/260.jpg
"/>
iſtuc quàm illuc; determinatur autem à cauſa impellente
<
lb
/>
per modum quo applicatur, ac iuxta poſitionem qua vrget,
<
lb
/>
ac diligit mobile in ipſa impulſione. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N17684
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N17686
">Cæterum ex dictis in hac quæſtione colligitur, non eſſe
<
lb
/>
eandem rationem de maiori facilitate motus violenti, ac
<
lb
/>
naturalis poſt principium motus; cum maior facilitas, quæ
<
lb
/>
reperitur in violenta motione corporis iam commoti, oria
<
lb
/>
tur ex reduplicatione illa impetus explicata: maior autem
<
lb
/>
facilitas, ac velocitas motus naturalis
<
expan
abbr
="
poſtquã
">poſtquam</
expan
>
corpus mo
<
lb
/>
ueri cœperit in ſolum
<
expan
abbr
="
locũ
">locum</
expan
>
, procedat ab impetu aduenien
<
lb
/>
te vltra grauitatem, aut leuitatem, qui adhuc ſucceſſiuè in
<
lb
/>
tenditur,
<
expan
abbr
="
promouetq.
">promouetque</
expan
>
magis ac magis vſque in
<
expan
abbr
="
finẽ
">finem</
expan
>
. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N176AB
">Quam
<
lb
/>
obrem abſque fundamento nonnulli oppoſitum putantes,
<
lb
/>
aiunt eandem eſſe vtrique motui facilitatis, ac velocitatis
<
lb
/>
rationem,
<
expan
abbr
="
eamq.
">eamque</
expan
>
conſiſtere in diſpoſitione prioris motus,
<
lb
/>
quo diſponatur ſubiectum ad motum poſteriorem: cum
<
lb
/>
nec motus, nec alia actio per ſe diſponere valeat ſubiectum
<
lb
/>
abſque formæ alicuius productione; nec vlla forma produ
<
lb
/>
ci poſſit per motum localem præter: præſentiam ipſam lo
<
lb
/>
calem, quæ ad nihil diſponit. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N176C2
"
type
="
head
">
<
s
id
="
N176C4
">Quæſtio Trigeſimaſecunda.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N176C7
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N176C9
">C
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
vr ea quæ proijciuntur, ceſſant à latione?
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
N176D0
">An quia impellens deſinit potentia, vel pro
<
lb
/>
pter retractionem, vel propter rei proiectæ in
<
lb
/>
clinarionem, quando ea valentior fuerit,
<
lb
/>
quàm pro<03>cientis vires. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N176D9
">Aut isthæc ambi
<
lb
/>
gere, principium relinquentes, abſurdum eſt.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N176E0
"
type
="
head
">
<
s
id
="
N176E2
">COMMENTARIVS.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N176E6
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N176E8
">De motu proiectorum ſermonem inſtituens Ariſto
<
lb
/>
teles inuerſo ordine videtur procedere dum prius
<
lb
/>
hic quærit cur illa ceſſent à latione, deinde verò in </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>