Salusbury, Thomas, Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I), 1667

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 241]
[Figure 242]
[Figure 243]
[Figure 244]
[Figure 245]
[Figure 246]
[Figure 247]
[Figure 248]
[Figure 249]
[Figure 250]
[Figure 251]
[Figure 252]
[Figure 253]
[Figure 254]
[Figure 255]
[Figure 256]
[Figure 257]
[Figure 258]
[Figure 259]
[Figure 260]
[Figure 261]
[Figure 262]
[Figure 263]
[Figure 264]
[Figure 265]
[Figure 266]
[Figure 267]
[Figure 268]
[Figure 269]
[Figure 270]
< >
page |< < of 701 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <pb xlink:href="040/01/269.jpg" pagenum="249"/>
            <p type="head">
              <s>GALILÆUS
                <lb/>
              Galilæus Lyncæus,
                <lb/>
              HIS
                <lb/>
              SYSTEME
                <lb/>
              OF THE
                <lb/>
              WORLD.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="head">
              <s>The Third Dialogue.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="head">
              <s>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              INTERLOCVTORS.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p type="head">
              <s>SALVIATUS, SAGREDUS, and SIMPLICIUS.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SAGR. </s>
              <s>The great deſire wherewith I have expected
                <lb/>
              your coming, that I might hear the novel
                <lb/>
              conceits touching the annual
                <lb/>
              on of this our Globe, hath made me
                <lb/>
              think the houres of the laſt night, and
                <lb/>
              thoſe of this morning very tedious,
                <lb/>
              though I ſpent them not idly, but lying
                <lb/>
              awake I imployed a good part thereof in
                <lb/>
              ruminating upon our yeſterdayes
                <lb/>
              ſes, weighing the reaſons alledged by both parties, in favour of
                <lb/>
              the two contrary Hypotheſes, that of
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Ariſtotle
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Ptolomy,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and
                <lb/>
              this of
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Ariſtarchus,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Copernicus.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              And really methinks, that
                <lb/>
              which ever of theſe parties have been deceived, they are worthy of
                <lb/>
              excuſe, ſo ſpecious and valid in appearance are the reaſons that
                <lb/>
              may have perſwaded them either way; though nevertheleſſe we </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>