Fabri, Honoré, Tractatus physicus de motu locali, 1646

Page concordance

< >
< >
page |< < of 491 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap id="N1EE3A">
            <p id="N1F016" type="main">
              <s id="N1F027">
                <pb pagenum="237" xlink:href="026/01/269.jpg"/>
              impetus: quippe omnis motus eſt ab impetu, quod ſæpiùs in toto libro
                <lb/>
              primo demonſtratum eſt. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F032" type="main">
              <s id="N1F034">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Axioma
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              3.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F041" type="main">
              <s id="N1F043">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Impetus destruitur tantùm ne ſit frustra per Sch. Theor.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              152.
                <emph type="italics"/>
              & alia multa
                <lb/>
              libro primò,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ſi enim impetus ſuum poſſet habere effectum reuerâ non de­
                <lb/>
              ſtrueretur. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F057" type="main">
              <s id="N1F059">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Axioma
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              4.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F066" type="main">
              <s id="N1F068">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Tunc dici non poteſt tota cauſa destructa (cauſa inquam formalis) cum
                <lb/>
              tuus effectus non eſt deſtructus
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; ſeu tunc non debet dici deſtructus totus
                <lb/>
              impetus cum totus motus non eſt deſtructus. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F075" type="main">
              <s id="N1F077">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              1.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F084" type="main">
              <s id="N1F086">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Datur motus reflexus
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; </s>
              <s id="N1F08F">nemo dubitat: </s>
              <s id="N1F093">quippe aliquod corpus in aliud
                <lb/>
              impactum reflectitur per Ax. primum ſed ſi corpus reflectitur eſt motus
                <lb/>
              reflexus; </s>
              <s id="N1F09B">igitur certum eſt de motu reflexo quod ſit; infrà verò videbi­
                <lb/>
              mus propter quid ſit. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F0A1" type="main">
              <s id="N1F0A3">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              2.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F0B0" type="main">
              <s id="N1F0B2">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              In motu reflexo eſt impetus
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; probatur, quia vbi eſt motus, ibi eſt impe­
                <lb/>
              tus per Axioma 2. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F0BE" type="main">
              <s id="N1F0C0">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              3.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F0CD" type="main">
              <s id="N1F0CF">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Hinc cauſa motus reflexi eſt impetus qui ineſt corpori reflexo
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; </s>
              <s id="N1F0D8">nec enim eſt
                <lb/>
              quidquam aliud applicatum cum mobile ſeparatum tùm à corpore refle­
                <lb/>
              ctente, tùm à manu proiicientis etiam moueatur; </s>
              <s id="N1F0E0">igitur nihil extrinſe­
                <lb/>
              cum poteſt eſſe cauſa huius motus; </s>
              <s id="N1F0E6">igitur aliquod intrinſecum, voco
                <lb/>
              impetum; </s>
              <s id="N1F0EC">hîc diutiùs non hæreo, quia ſimile argumentum habes in ter­
                <lb/>
              tio libro, in quo fusè probaui requiri impetum ad motum violentum,
                <lb/>
              atqui nullus motus reflexus eſt naturalis; igitur violentus vel mixtus,
                <lb/>
              igitur requirit neceſſariò impetum. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F0F6" type="main">
              <s id="N1F0F8">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              4.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F105" type="main">
              <s id="N1F107">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Ille impetus vel producitur nouus, vel conſeruatur prauius
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; clarum eſt,
                <lb/>
              nec aliud excogitari poteſt. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F112" type="main">
              <s id="N1F114">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              5.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1F121" type="main">
              <s id="N1F123">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Ille impetus non producitur à corpore reflectente
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              : </s>
              <s id="N1F12C">probatur primò, quia
                <lb/>
              omnis impetus producitur ad extra ab alio impetu per Theor. 42. lib.1.
                <lb/>
              Secundò probatur, quia corpus reflectens ſemper produceret impetum
                <lb/>
              in alio corpore applicato; </s>
              <s id="N1F138">eſſet enim cauſa neceſſaria; </s>
              <s id="N1F13C">igitur neceſſariò
                <lb/>
              ageret per Ax.12. lib.1. nec eſt quod dicas agere tantùm poſita tali con­
                <lb/>
              ditione: </s>
              <s id="N1F144">hoc eſt poſito motu præuio, quod ſatis ridiculum eſt, vt iam
                <lb/>
              aliàs monui; </s>
              <s id="N1F14A">quia conditio nihil aliud præſtat in cauſa quàm applicatio­
                <lb/>
              nem ſubiecti apti, in quo agat, & ſubtractionem omnis impedimenti; </s>
              <s id="N1F150">
                <lb/>
              atqui cum proximè pila parieti adhæret, eſt omninò applicata, & abeſt
                <lb/>
              omne impedimentum: </s>
              <s id="N1F157">præterea ſi corpus reflectens ageret; </s>
              <s id="N1F15B">haud dubiè </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>