Salusbury, Thomas, Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I), 1667

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 271]
[Figure 272]
[Figure 273]
[Figure 274]
[Figure 275]
[Figure 276]
[Figure 277]
[Figure 278]
[Figure 279]
[Figure 280]
[Figure 281]
[Figure 282]
[Figure 283]
[Figure 284]
[Figure 285]
[Figure 286]
[Figure 287]
[Figure 288]
[Figure 289]
[Figure 290]
[Figure 291]
[Figure 292]
[Figure 293]
[Figure 294]
[Figure 295]
[Figure 296]
[Figure 297]
[Figure 298]
[Figure 299]
[Figure 300]
< >
page |< < of 701 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <pb xlink:href="040/01/269.jpg" pagenum="249"/>
            <p type="head">
              <s>GALILÆUS
                <lb/>
              Galilæus Lyncæus,
                <lb/>
              HIS
                <lb/>
              SYSTEME
                <lb/>
              OF THE
                <lb/>
              WORLD.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="head">
              <s>The Third Dialogue.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="head">
              <s>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              INTERLOCVTORS.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p type="head">
              <s>SALVIATUS, SAGREDUS, and SIMPLICIUS.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SAGR. </s>
              <s>The great deſire wherewith I have expected
                <lb/>
              your coming, that I might hear the novel
                <lb/>
              conceits touching the annual
                <lb/>
              on of this our Globe, hath made me
                <lb/>
              think the houres of the laſt night, and
                <lb/>
              thoſe of this morning very tedious,
                <lb/>
              though I ſpent them not idly, but lying
                <lb/>
              awake I imployed a good part thereof in
                <lb/>
              ruminating upon our yeſterdayes
                <lb/>
              ſes, weighing the reaſons alledged by both parties, in favour of
                <lb/>
              the two contrary Hypotheſes, that of
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Ariſtotle
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Ptolomy,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and
                <lb/>
              this of
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Ariſtarchus,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Copernicus.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              And really methinks, that
                <lb/>
              which ever of theſe parties have been deceived, they are worthy of
                <lb/>
              excuſe, ſo ſpecious and valid in appearance are the reaſons that
                <lb/>
              may have perſwaded them either way; though nevertheleſſe we </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>