Borro, Girolamo
,
De motu gravium et levium
,
1575
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 316
>
Scan
Original
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 316
>
page
|<
<
of 316
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
subchap1
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001733
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
257
"
xlink:href
="
011/01/277.jpg
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
rum, non autem in generatione vniuoca in conſtituenda hypo
<
lb
/>
theſi, vtriuſque generationis exemplum attulimus: etenim ex
<
lb
/>
crebro ſilicis, & ferri attritu ignis æquiuocè gignitur, hic ve
<
lb
/>
rò ignis, æquiuocè genitus, alterum ignem vniuocè gignit, nunc
<
lb
/>
reſpondeo.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001734
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Forma ignis prius geniti non est mouens, & mota reſpe
<
lb
/>
ctu eiuſdem, sed reſpectu diuerſorum: ad probationem reſpon
<
lb
/>
deo: forma prior nouum ignem generare potest, &
<
expan
abbr
="
leuitatẽ
">leuitatem</
expan
>
<
lb
/>
efficere valet in ſubiecto
<
expan
abbr
="
tamẽ
">tamen</
expan
>
, in quo nouus ignis gignitur non
<
lb
/>
in ſuo proprio ſubiecto: leuitas enim prioris ignis ab eiuſdem
<
lb
/>
ignis forma non gignitur sed à generante: generans enim
<
lb
/>
ignem, ignis formam generat: leuitatem, motum, & cætera,
<
lb
/>
quæ formam neceſſario conſequuntur, ignis, à gener ante pri
<
lb
/>
mo loco genitus nouum ignem gignit: cui dat formam, leuita
<
lb
/>
tem, & motum. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001735
">Non est ergo eadem forma mouens, & mo
<
lb
/>
tare ſpectu ſui ipſius; sed mota ratione generantis, & mouens
<
lb
/>
ratione ignis ſecundo loco geniti. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001736
">Falſa eſt ergo minor ſecundi
<
lb
/>
syllogismi ſi reſpectu eiuſdem intelligatur, & vera reſpectu di
<
lb
/>
uerſorum: tunc non ſequitur: eamdem numero formam eſſe
<
lb
/>
mouentem, & motam ratione vnius, sed tantum ratione duo
<
lb
/>
rum, & argumentum eſt ex quatuor terminis ideo
<
expan
abbr
="
conſequẽ-tia
">conſequen
<
lb
/>
tia</
expan
>
est omnino neganda.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001737
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Hoc argumentum eſt efficacissimum, vt videtis, & expli
<
lb
/>
catio exitus illius eſt inuoluta; ideo abre fortaſſe non erit, ſi
<
lb
/>
illud in nouam formam redigatur: quo quantum illi roboris
<
lb
/>
inſit facilius intelligatur, sed arrigite aures viri doctissimi.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001738
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Forma vt forma mouet; forma, vt in materia mouetur:
<
lb
/>
ergo eadem forma numero eſt mouens, & mota: ergo eadem
<
lb
/>
forma numero mouet ſe per ſe: hæc postrema
<
expan
abbr
="
conſequẽtia
">conſequentia</
expan
>
pro
<
lb
/>
batur. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001739
">Mouens vt mouens per ſe & primo mouet mobile vt
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
subchap1
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>