Borro, Girolamo
,
De motu gravium et levium
,
1575
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 316
>
Scan
Original
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 316
>
page
|<
<
of 316
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
subchap1
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001733
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
257
"
xlink:href
="
011/01/277.jpg
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
rum, non autem in generatione vniuoca in conſtituenda hypo
<
lb
/>
theſi, vtriuſque generationis exemplum attulimus: etenim ex
<
lb
/>
crebro ſilicis, & ferri attritu ignis æquiuocè gignitur, hic ve
<
lb
/>
rò ignis, æquiuocè genitus, alterum ignem vniuocè gignit, nunc
<
lb
/>
reſpondeo.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001734
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Forma ignis prius geniti non est mouens, & mota reſpe
<
lb
/>
ctu eiuſdem, sed reſpectu diuerſorum: ad probationem reſpon
<
lb
/>
deo: forma prior nouum ignem generare potest, &
<
expan
abbr
="
leuitatẽ
">leuitatem</
expan
>
<
lb
/>
efficere valet in ſubiecto
<
expan
abbr
="
tamẽ
">tamen</
expan
>
, in quo nouus ignis gignitur non
<
lb
/>
in ſuo proprio ſubiecto: leuitas enim prioris ignis ab eiuſdem
<
lb
/>
ignis forma non gignitur sed à generante: generans enim
<
lb
/>
ignem, ignis formam generat: leuitatem, motum, & cætera,
<
lb
/>
quæ formam neceſſario conſequuntur, ignis, à gener ante pri
<
lb
/>
mo loco genitus nouum ignem gignit: cui dat formam, leuita
<
lb
/>
tem, & motum. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001735
">Non est ergo eadem forma mouens, & mo
<
lb
/>
tare ſpectu ſui ipſius; sed mota ratione generantis, & mouens
<
lb
/>
ratione ignis ſecundo loco geniti. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001736
">Falſa eſt ergo minor ſecundi
<
lb
/>
syllogismi ſi reſpectu eiuſdem intelligatur, & vera reſpectu di
<
lb
/>
uerſorum: tunc non ſequitur: eamdem numero formam eſſe
<
lb
/>
mouentem, & motam ratione vnius, sed tantum ratione duo
<
lb
/>
rum, & argumentum eſt ex quatuor terminis ideo
<
expan
abbr
="
conſequẽ-tia
">conſequen
<
lb
/>
tia</
expan
>
est omnino neganda.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001737
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Hoc argumentum eſt efficacissimum, vt videtis, & expli
<
lb
/>
catio exitus illius eſt inuoluta; ideo abre fortaſſe non erit, ſi
<
lb
/>
illud in nouam formam redigatur: quo quantum illi roboris
<
lb
/>
inſit facilius intelligatur, sed arrigite aures viri doctissimi.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001738
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Forma vt forma mouet; forma, vt in materia mouetur:
<
lb
/>
ergo eadem forma numero eſt mouens, & mota: ergo eadem
<
lb
/>
forma numero mouet ſe per ſe: hæc postrema
<
expan
abbr
="
conſequẽtia
">conſequentia</
expan
>
pro
<
lb
/>
batur. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001739
">Mouens vt mouens per ſe & primo mouet mobile vt
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
subchap1
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>