Gassendi, Pierre, De proportione qua gravia decidentia accelerantur, 1646

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
< >
page |< < of 360 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.001832">
                <pb pagenum="244" xlink:href="028/01/284.jpg"/>
              quàm verſus aliam regionem; ideò ratiocinatus ſum
                <lb/>
              huiuſmodi motus principium eſſe debere vel in aëre, à
                <lb/>
              quo quam-ptimùm lapis fuerit contactus, cœperit mo­
                <lb/>
              ueri; vel in Terra, verſus quam, non aliò inſtitutus mo­
                <lb/>
              tus fuerit; non verò in lapide ipſo, qui quandiù ſolus
                <lb/>
              fuerit, nihilque externum ad ipſum appulerit, ipſumve
                <lb/>
              contigerit, eo motu caruerit. </s>
              <s id="s.001833">Rurſus autem, quia ani­
                <lb/>
              maduerti, ſi nihil vſquàm rerum eſſet, præter aërem, ac
                <lb/>
              in aëre lapidem, non fore cur lapis in hanc potiùs par­
                <lb/>
              tem, quàm in aliam quamlibet ferretur; idcircò con­
                <lb/>
              cluſi, cùm lapis cœperit verſus
                <expan abbr="Terrã">Terram</expan>
              ferri, debere ſaltem
                <lb/>
              primam motus cauſſam ab ipſa Terra procedere; vnde
                <lb/>
              & attracticem vim in ipſa Terra eſſe conceſſi. </s>
              <s id="s.001834">Et quòd
                <lb/>
              talis vis eſſe non poſſit procùl actuoſa, propè otioſa;
                <lb/>
              ideò ex illius actione continente in lapidem, collegi
                <lb/>
              eſſe neceſſarium inualeſcere impetum, ſeu accelerari in
                <lb/>
              lapide motum. </s>
              <s id="s.001835">Quoniam verò peruidere ſum viſus ex
                <lb/>
              ſola hac attractione non poſſe explicari proportionem
                <lb/>
              eiuſce accelerationis; & aliunde reputaui aërem, tamet­
                <lb/>
              ſi non poſſit fieri cauſſa initij motus, poſſe nihilomi­
                <lb/>
              nus motum ſemel cœptum iuuare, ac veluti prouchere;
                <lb/>
              idcircò illum quoque adhibui, & ex eius vi impulſiua,
                <lb/>
              cum attractrice terræ coniuncta compoſui cauſſam
                <lb/>
              proportionis integram, quo legiſti modo. </s>
              <s id="s.001836">Hæc re­
                <lb/>
              peto autem, vt tibi inſinuem, quamobrem non modò
                <lb/>
              accelerationem, ſed ipſum quoque motum, ſiue pri­
                <lb/>
              mum initium motus, qui à te dicitur deſcenſus, eſſe à
                <lb/>
              principio externo cenſuerim. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.001837">X. </s>
              <s id="s.001838">Ratio aliunde mihi fuit, quòd nihil videretur
                <lb/>
              magis conſentaneum, quàm motum foueri, incremen-</s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum