Borro, Girolamo
,
De motu gravium et levium
,
1575
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 316
>
Scan
Original
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 316
>
page
|<
<
of 316
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
subchap1
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001803
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
269
"
xlink:href
="
011/01/289.jpg
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
quo circa Aristoteles (vt ſui moris est) artificiosè colligit,
<
lb
/>
quieſcere totum primo, cum pars eius mota non fuerit primo:
<
lb
/>
licet id non ſequatur; ſi de eo motu tantum argumentum in
<
lb
/>
telligatur, qui eſt per partem: totum enim moueri altera to
<
lb
/>
tius parte quieſcente continget ſed non primo.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001804
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Abſolutis argumentis quæ Alexandro cum Galeno com
<
lb
/>
munia eſſe videbantur, sed ea quæ propria eſſe Alexandri
<
lb
/>
creduntur, abſoluenda pari diligentia deſcendendum.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001805
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Alexander ergo hanc Aristotelis demonſtrationem re
<
lb
/>
prehendit, vt quæ id ſibi dari poſtulet, quod erat in principio:
<
lb
/>
etenim ex hoc, quod pars non mouetur
<
expan
abbr
="
totũ
">totum</
expan
>
per ſe primo non
<
lb
/>
moueri colligat, qui enim partem quieſcere possit eo ipſo, &
<
lb
/>
totum ipſum primo quieſcere, & primo non moueri ponit: at
<
lb
/>
erat Ariſtoteli demonſtrandum, & non ponendum illius par
<
lb
/>
tem, quod mouetur, quieſcere.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.001806
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Cui reſpondemus, ac vt rem ipſam acu (vt in prouerbio
<
lb
/>
fertur) attingamus, meminiſſe oportet: id ipſum, quod à
<
lb
/>
ſe ipſo mouetur, quoad videlicet mouetur, habere partes in
<
lb
/>
quas diuidi potest; at id quod conflatum eſt ex partibus, non
<
lb
/>
neceſſariò quieſcit, & mouetur primo, sed moueri, & quie
<
lb
/>
ſcere potest tum primo, tum cauſa partis, quod per ac
<
lb
/>
cidens eſſe & non omnino, non ſemel dictum est ſupra:
<
lb
/>
non apparet autem continuum ex partibus conflatum moue
<
lb
/>
ri cauſa partis, niſi ipſum cauſa partis prius quieſcere con
<
lb
/>
ceſſum fuerit: continuum autem ratione partis quieſcen
<
lb
/>
tis poſſe quieſcere, ab Aristotele demonſtratum est ex op
<
lb
/>
poſito, quod est euidentius. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.001807
">Si enim (inquit) id, quod ab ali
<
lb
/>
quo mouetur, eo quod aliud quieſcat, quieſcere neceſſe non eſt,
<
lb
/>
id quod alio quieſcente quieſcit, ab alio mouetur, ab eo certè,
<
lb
/>
ad cuius quietem quieſcit: & ex hoc Aristoteles concludit,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
subchap1
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>