Galilei, Galileo
,
Discourse concerning the natation of bodies
,
1663
Text
Text Image
XML
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 77
>
Scan
Original
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 77
>
page
|<
<
of 77
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
pagenum
="
428
"/>
and, furthermore, not with every Matter, but with thoſe
<
lb
/>
wherewith it may be able ro execute the deſired operation. </
s
>
<
s
>
<
lb
/>
as we ſee it verified by Experience, that the Acute and ſharp Angle
<
lb
/>
more apt to cut, than the Obtuſe; yet alwaies provided, that
<
lb
/>
the one and the other, be joyned with a Matter apt to cut, as
<
lb
/>
example, with Steel. </
s
>
<
s
>Therefore, a Knife with a fine and
<
lb
/>
edge, cuts Bread or Wood with much eaſe, which it will not do,
<
lb
/>
the edge be blunt and thick: but he that will inſtead of Steel,
<
lb
/>
Wax, and mould it into a Knife, undoubtedly ſhall never know
<
lb
/>
effects of ſharp and blunt edges: becauſe neither of them will
<
lb
/>
the Wax being unable by reaſon of its flexibility, to overcome
<
lb
/>
hardneſs of the Wood and Bread. </
s
>
<
s
>And, therefore, applying
<
lb
/>
like diſcourſe to our purpoſe, they ſay, that the difference of Figure
<
lb
/>
will ſhew different effects, touching Natation and Submerſion,
<
lb
/>
not conjoyned with any kind of Matter, but only with thoſe
<
lb
/>
which, by their Gravity, are apt to reſiſt the Velocity of the
<
lb
/>
whence he that would elect for the Matter, Cork or other light
<
lb
/>
unable, through its Levity, to ſuperate the Craſſitude of the
<
lb
/>
and of that Matter ſhould forme Solids of divers Figures, woulld
<
lb
/>
vain ſeek to find out what operation Figure hath in Natation or
<
lb
/>
merſion; becauſe all would ſwim, and that not through any property
<
lb
/>
of this or that Figure, but through the debility of the Matter,
<
lb
/>
ing ſo much Gravity, as is requiſite to ſuperate and overcome the
<
lb
/>
Denſity and Craſſitude of the water.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1459
"/>
An objection
<
lb
/>
gainſt the
<
lb
/>
riment in Wax.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Its needfull, therefore, if wee would ſee the effect wrought by
<
lb
/>
Diverſity of Figure, firſt to make choice of a Matter of its
<
lb
/>
apt to penetrate the Craſſitude of the water. </
s
>
<
s
>And, for this
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1460
"/>
<
lb
/>
they have made choice of ſuch a Matter, as fit, that being readily
<
lb
/>
duced into Sphericall Figure, goes to the Bottom; and it is Ebony
<
lb
/>
of which they afterwards making a ſmall Board or Splinter, as thin
<
lb
/>
a Lath, have illuſtrated how that this, put upon the Surface of the
<
lb
/>
water, reſts there without deſcending to the Bottom: and making, on
<
lb
/>
the otherſide, of the ſame wood a Ball, no leſs than a hazell Nut,
<
lb
/>
they ſhew, that this ſwims not, but deſcendes. </
s
>
<
s
>From which
<
lb
/>
ment, they think they may frankly conclude, that the Breadth ofthe
<
lb
/>
Figure in the flat Lath or Board, is the cauſe of its not deſcendingto
<
lb
/>
the Bottom, foraſmuch as a Ball of the ſame Matter, not
<
lb
/>
from the Board in any thing but in Figure, ſubmergeth in the
<
lb
/>
water to the Bottom. </
s
>
<
s
>The diſcourſe and the Experiment hath
<
lb
/>
ſo much of probability and likely hood of truth in it, that it would be
<
lb
/>
no wonder, if many perſwaded by a certain curſory
<
lb
/>
ſhould yield credit to it; nevertheleſs, I think I am able to diſcover,
<
lb
/>
how that it is not free from falacy.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1460
"/>
An
<
lb
/>
ment in Ebany,
<
lb
/>
brought to
<
lb
/>
prove the
<
lb
/>
timent in Wax.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Beginning, therefore, to examine one by one, all the particulars </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>