Boyle, Robert, New experiments physico-mechanicall, touching the spring of the air and its effects, 1660

Page concordance

< >
< >
page |< < of 862 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s>
                <pb xlink:href="013/01/323.jpg" pagenum="293"/>
              it is. </s>
              <s>And becauſe we have hitherto but
                <lb/>
              lightly touch'd upon a matter of ſuch im­
                <lb/>
              portance, we preſume it wil not be thought
                <lb/>
              impertinent, upon this occaſion, to annex
                <lb/>
              ſomething towards the Elucidation of
                <lb/>
              it. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>What we have already try'd and newly
                <lb/>
              ſet down, allows us to take it for granted,
                <lb/>
              that (at leaſt about
                <emph type="italics"/>
              London
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ) the propor­
                <lb/>
              tion of gravity betwixt Water and Air,
                <lb/>
              of equal bulk, is as of a thouſand to
                <lb/>
              one. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>The next thing therefore that we are
                <lb/>
              to enquire after, in order to our preſent
                <lb/>
              deſign, is the difference in weight betwixt
                <lb/>
              Water and Quick-ſilver: And though
                <lb/>
              this hath been defin'd already by the Il­
                <lb/>
              luſtrious
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Verulam,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and ſome other inqui­
                <lb/>
              ſitive Perſons, that have compar'd the
                <lb/>
              weight of ſeveral Bodies, and caſt their
                <lb/>
              Obſervations into Tables, yet we ſhall
                <lb/>
              not ſcruple to annex our own tryals about
                <lb/>
              it: Partly, becauſe we finde Authors
                <lb/>
              conſiderably to diſ-agree; partly, becauſe
                <lb/>
              we uſ'd exacter Scales, and a ſomewhat
                <lb/>
              more wary method then others ſeem to
                <lb/>
              have done: And partly alſo, becauſe ha­
                <lb/>
              ving proſecuted our inquiry by two or
                <lb/>
              three ſeveral ways; the ſmall difference </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>