Fabri, Honoré
,
Tractatus physicus de motu locali
,
1646
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 491
>
Scan
Original
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 491
>
page
|<
<
of 491
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
id
="
N2136B
">
<
p
id
="
N2252B
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N2259E
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
291
"
xlink:href
="
026/01/325.jpg
"/>
tentia applicata in B, ita vt in puncto B producatur impetus eiuſdem
<
lb
/>
perfectionis, de quo ſuprà: </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225A9
">ſi mouetur motu circulari circa aliquod cen
<
lb
/>
trum v. g. circa centrum H, & punctum B conficiat arcum BD æqua
<
lb
/>
lem rectæ b I, vel BL quam æquali tempore B vel A antè percurrebant
<
lb
/>
motu recto; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225B7
">certè totus cylindrus BH acquiret tantùm ſpatium BHD
<
lb
/>
motu circulari circa centrum H; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225BD
">ſed motu recto acquiſiuit ſpatium re
<
lb
/>
ctanguli BK, quod maius eſt, vt patet; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225C3
">igitur motus circularis circa H
<
lb
/>
cylindri BH eſt ad rectum, vt ſector BHD ad rectangulum BK; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225C9
">igitur
<
lb
/>
facilitas motus circularis eſt ad facilitatem motus recti præſentis, vt re
<
lb
/>
ctangulum BK ad ſectorem BHD; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225D1
">quænam verò ſit hæc proportio pa
<
lb
/>
tet ex Cyclometria, ſuppoſitâ ratione Archimedis periphæriæ ad diame
<
lb
/>
trum; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225D9
">igitur cum cylindrus impulſus in B faciliùs moueri poſſit motu
<
lb
/>
circulari, quàm recto, vt conſtat ex dictis; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225DF
">& cùm eo motu moueatur,
<
lb
/>
quo faciliùs moueri poteſt; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225E5
">modò poſſit ad illum determinari, non mirum
<
lb
/>
eſt ſi eo moueatur, & minor impetus producatur in eodem cylindro
<
lb
/>
BH; debet autem eſſe aliquod centrum huius motus, quod determina
<
lb
/>
bimus paulò pòſt, poſtquam breuiter exilem quamdam objectionem de
<
lb
/>
impetu refutauerimus. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N225F1
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N225F3
">Itaque obiiciunt aliqui, impetum non produci ad extra ab impetu; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225F7
">
<
lb
/>
quia ſcilicet impetus habet iam effectum ſcilicet motum; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N225FC
">igitur aliud
<
lb
/>
munus non eſt illi imponendum; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22602
">igitur non producit alium effectum;
<
lb
/>
igitur non eſt cauſa impetus. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N22608
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N2260A
">Reſpondeo primò, calor eſt cauſa rarefactionis; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N2260E
">igitur non producit
<
lb
/>
alium calorem, quia habet iam vnum effectum; ſi tuum argumentum
<
lb
/>
concludit, meum quoque concludet. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22616
">Reſpondeo ſecundò, anima produ
<
lb
/>
cit viſionem, ergo auditionem producere non poteſt, cùm iam habeat
<
lb
/>
vnum effectum: </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N2261E
">Dices, eandem cauſam poſſe habere plures effectus; cur
<
lb
/>
igitur negas de impetu? </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
id
="
N22624
"
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
N22626
">Reſpondeo tertiò directè, motum eſſe effectum impetus ad intra, quem
<
lb
/>
præſtat in ſuo ſubjecto; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N2262C
">igitur eſt effectus formalis ſecundarius; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22630
">nec
<
lb
/>
alius eſſe poteſt, vt lib.1. demonſtrauimus; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22636
">at verò impetus eſt effectus
<
lb
/>
alterius impetus ad extra; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N2263C
">igitur impetus eſt cauſa efficiens impetus, id
<
lb
/>
que ad extra & cauſa formalis, vel exigitiua motus ad intra; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22642
">ſicut calor
<
lb
/>
eſt cauſa formalis, vel exigitiua rarefactionis ad intra, cauſa verò effi
<
lb
/>
ciens alterius caloris ad extra; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N2264A
">& verò nullo argumento probabis calo
<
lb
/>
rem à calore produci, quo ego non probem impetum ab impetu produ
<
lb
/>
ci; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22652
">igitur impetus eſt cauſa alterius impetus; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22656
">quia phyſicè loquendo il
<
lb
/>
lud vocamus cauſam, ex cuius applicatione ſequitur neceſſariò effectus; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N2265C
">
<
lb
/>
atqui applicato corpore ſolo ſine impetu nullus impetus producitur ad
<
lb
/>
extra, vt patet; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22663
">applicato verò cum impetu, producitur ſtatim alius im
<
lb
/>
petus; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22669
">igitur ipſe impetus eſt cauſa: </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N2266D
">nec dicas requiri, vt conditionem; </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22671
">
<
lb
/>
quia primò, nullum eſſet munus huius conditionis; nec enim applica
<
lb
/>
ret cauſam ſubjecto, nec remoueret vllum impedimentum. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22678
">Secundò di
<
lb
/>
cam ſimiliter calorem eſſe conditionem. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N2267D
">Tertiò, dicerem etiam eſſe con
<
lb
/>
ditionem ad motum. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
N22682
">Quartò, quis dicat corpus graue producere impe-</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>