Archimedes, Natation of bodies, 1662

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
< >
page |< < of 68 > >|
1
(a) By 4. of the
ſixth.
* Or permitting.
(b) By 22. of the
ſixth.
(c) By Cor. of 20.
of the ſixth.
LEMMA IV.
The ſame things aſſumed again, and M Q being drawn from the
Point M unto the Diameter, let it touch the Section in the
Point M.
I ſay that H Q hath to Q O, the ſame proportion
that G H hath to C N.
For make H R equall to G F; and ſeeing that
34[Figure 34]
the Triangles A F C and O P N are alike, and
P N equall to F C, we might in like manner de­
monſtrate P O and F A to be equall to each other:
Wherefore P O ſhall be double to F B: But H O
is double to G B: Therefore the Remainder P H
is alſo double to the Remainder F G; that is, to
R H: And therefore is followeth that P R, R H
and F G are equall to one another; as alſo that
R G and P F are equall: For P G is common to
both R P and G F.
Since therefore, that H B is
to B G, as G B is to B F, by Converſion of Pro­
portion, B H ſhall be to H G, as B G is to G F:
But Q H is to H B, as H O to B G.
For by 35
of our firſt Book of Conicks, in regard that Q
M toucheth the Section in the Point M, H B and
B Q ſhall be equall, and Q H double to H B:
Therefore, ex æquali, Q H ſhall be to H G, as
H O to G F; that is, to H R: and, Permu­
tando, Q H ſhall be to H O, as H G to H R: again, by Converſion, H Q ſhall be to Q
O, as H G to G R; that is, to P F; and, by the ſame reaſon, to C N: Whichwas to be de­
monſtrated.
Theſe things therefore being explained, we come now to that
which was propounded.
I ſay, therefore, firſt that N C hath
to C K the ſame proportion that H G hath to G B.
For ſince that H Q is to Q O, as H G to C N;
35[Figure 35]
that is, to A O, equall to the ſaid C N: The Re­
mainder G Q ſhall be to the Remainder Q A, as
H Q to Q O: and, for the ſame cauſe, the Lines
A C and G L prolonged, by the things that wee
have above demonstrated, ſhall interſect or meet
in the Line Q M. Again, G Q is to Q A,
as H Q to Q O: that is, as H G to F P; as

(a) was bnt now demonstrated, But unto (b) G

Q two Lines taken together, Q B that is H B, and
B G are equall: and to Q A H F is equall; for
if from the equall Magnitudes H B and B Q there
be taken the equall Magnitudes F B and B A, the
Re mainder ſhall be equall; Therefore taking H
G from the two Lines H B and B G, there ſhall re­
main a Magnitude double to B G; that is, O H:
and P F taken from F H, the Remainder is H P:
Wherefore (c) O H is to H P, as G Q to Q A:

But as G Q is to Q A, ſo is H Q to Q O;

Text layer

  • Dictionary
  • Places

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index