Caverni, Raffaello, Storia del metodo sperimentale in Italia, 1891-1900

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 31]
[Figure 32]
[Figure 33]
[Figure 34]
[Figure 35]
[Figure 36]
[Figure 37]
[Figure 38]
[Figure 39]
[Figure 40]
[Figure 41]
[Figure 42]
[Figure 43]
[Figure 44]
[Figure 45]
[Figure 46]
[Figure 47]
[Figure 48]
[Figure 49]
[Figure 50]
[Figure 51]
[Figure 52]
[Figure 53]
[Figure 54]
[Figure 55]
[Figure 56]
[Figure 57]
[Figure 58]
[Figure 59]
[Figure 60]
< >
page |< < of 3504 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s>
                <pb xlink:href="020/01/379.jpg" pagenum="360"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Tractatus Marci Antonii De Dominis, per Joannem Bartolum in lucem
                <lb/>
              editus.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>L'Autore mostra di avere avuto e di aver tuttavia una gran fiducia di
                <lb/>
              esser coll'opera sua riuscito a sodisfar pienamente e con gran facilità al de­
                <lb/>
              siderio di coloro, che volevan saper la maniera e la ragione del ritrovato
                <lb/>
              olandese. </s>
              <s>Una tal fiducia vien da lui stesso espressa per le seguenti parole:
                <lb/>
              “ Ex hactenus a nobis dictis et explicatis de vitreis perspicillis, facillimum
                <lb/>
              negotium redditur in conficiendo instrumento illo quod nuper videtur in­
                <lb/>
              ventum aut saltem, praesertim in Italia, publicatum. </s>
              <s>Id enim, quemadmo­
                <lb/>
              dum maxima admiratione affecit et afficit plurimos, ita mihi certe qui in
                <lb/>
              perspectivis ante multos, sed per multos etiam annos delectationis causa men­
                <lb/>
              tem exercui, nulli prorsus fuit admirationi, sed cum primum illud vidi, erat
                <lb/>
              autem valde imperfectum, effectum duorum vitrorum aperte cognovi ” (ivi,
                <lb/>
              pag. </s>
              <s>37, 38). </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>Questa vantata facilità d'intendere ciò che a tutti era sembrato tanto
                <lb/>
              difficile, il
                <emph type="italics"/>
              De Dominis
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              la riconosce dunque dall'essersi per tanti anni eser­
                <lb/>
              citato negli studi di Prospettiva, e dall'aver saputo spiegare le proprietà delle
                <lb/>
              lenti. </s>
              <s>E infatti egli aveva sufficientemente bene dimostrato l'ingrandimento
                <lb/>
              virtuale delle immagini nelle lenti convesse, concludendo così la sua dimo­
                <lb/>
              strazione: “ Itaque oculus non videt quantitatem sub angulo directo et na­
                <lb/>
              turali, sed sub angulo, qui est angulus maior ” (pag. </s>
              <s>19). Aveva pure in
                <lb/>
              sufficiente maniera descritto il rappresentarsi delle immagini virtuali nelle
                <lb/>
              lenti concave, concludendo così intorno ad esse: “ Oculus videt quantitatem
                <lb/>
              sub angulo qui est minor et strictior angulo naturali, et minorem vitri par­
                <lb/>
              tem occupat et consequenter res quidem minor apparebit, sed clarior et
                <lb/>
              distinctior ” (ibi). </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>Tali diottriche conclusioni però, benchè vere e sufficientemente dimo­
                <lb/>
              strate, non eran quelle che più facevano all'uopo. </s>
              <s>Imperocchè, consistendo
                <lb/>
              la ragione del Canocchiale nell'immagine reale e rovesciata dell'obiettivo,
                <lb/>
              che viene ingrandita e raddirizzata dall'oculare, il De Dominis intorno a ciò
                <lb/>
              mostra di non saperne niente, e perciò, riguardandosi da lui l'obiettivo stesso
                <lb/>
              come una lente d'ingrandimento virtuale, ecco come frantende l'ufficio del­
                <lb/>
              l'oculare, e come allo stesso tempo lasci gli studiosi in quella fame, a cui
                <lb/>
              con tanta facilità aveva fiducia di sodisfare. </s>
              <s>“ Caeterum iam vidimus quae
                <lb/>
              valde remota sunt, per vitrum lenticulare cerni quidem cum ipsorum in­
                <lb/>
              cremento, remoto usque ad certum spacium ab oculo vitro praedicto, sed
                <lb/>
              turbate et indistincte, et confuse, propter mixtionem radiorum visualium di­
                <lb/>
              rectorum cum fractis. </s>
              <s>Si igitur aliqua ratione tolli posset haec confusio, ita
                <lb/>
              ut sublatis radiis directis per solos refractos fiat visio, ex duplici capite illa
                <lb/>
              clara esset et distincta, tum ex sublata confusione praedicta, tum ex rerum
                <lb/>
              visibilium dilatatione. </s>
              <s>Tollitur igitur confusio illa et extinguntur radii di­
                <lb/>
              recti, per appositionem vitri excavati inter oculum et vitrum lenticulare ”
                <lb/>
              (ibi, pag. </s>
              <s>34). </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>Tale e tanto in
                <gap/>
              era il fervor de'nuovi studi dioffrici in Ita-</s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>