Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
Scan
Original
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/038.jpg
"
pagenum
="
32
"/>
the laſt place, thoſe, by which others may be perſwaded, that the
<
lb
/>
Earth is no leſs than the Moon, or any other Planet to be
<
lb
/>
bered amongſt natural bodies that move circularly.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſhall the more willingly incline to this, in that I am
<
lb
/>
better ſatisfied with your Architectonical and general diſcourſe,
<
lb
/>
than with that of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
for yours convinceth me without the
<
lb
/>
leaſt ſcruple, and the other at every ſtep croſſeth my way with
<
lb
/>
ſome block. </
s
>
<
s
>And I ſee no reaſon why
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſhould not be
<
lb
/>
preſently ſatisfied with the Argument you alledg, to prove that
<
lb
/>
there can be no ſuch thing in nature as a motion by a right line,
<
lb
/>
if we do but preſuppoſe that the parts of the Univerſe are
<
lb
/>
ſed in an excellent conſtitution and perfect order.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Stay a little, good
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Sagredus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
for juſt now a way comes
<
lb
/>
into my mind, how I may give
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſatisfaction, provided
<
lb
/>
that he will not be ſo ſtrictly wedded to every expreſſion of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
riſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
as to hold it hereſie to recede in any thing from him. </
s
>
<
s
>Nor
<
lb
/>
is there any queſtion to be made, but that if we grant the
<
lb
/>
lent diſpoſition and perfect order of the parts of the Univerſe,
<
lb
/>
as to local ſcituation, that then there is no other but the circular
<
lb
/>
motion, and reſt; for as to the motion by a right line, I ſee not
<
lb
/>
how it can be of uſe for any thing, but to reduce to their natural
<
lb
/>
conſtitution, ſome integral bodies, that by ſome accident were
<
lb
/>
mov'd and ſeparated from their whole, as we ſaid above.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Let us now conſider the whole Terreſtrial Globe, and enquire
<
lb
/>
the beſt we can, whether it, and the other Mundane bodies are to
<
lb
/>
conſerve themſelves in their perfect and natural diſpoſition. </
s
>
<
s
>It
<
lb
/>
is neceſſary to ſay, either that it reſts and keeps perpetually
<
lb
/>
moveable in its place; or elſe that continuing always in its place,
<
lb
/>
it revolves in its ſelf; or that it turneth about a Centre, moving
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg94
"/>
<
lb
/>
by the circumference of a circle. </
s
>
<
s
>Of which accidents, both
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ptolomey,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and all their followers ſay, that it hath ever
<
lb
/>
obſerved, and ſhall continually keep the firſt, that is, a perpetual
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg95
"/>
<
lb
/>
reſt in the ſame place. </
s
>
<
s
>Now, why, I pray you, ought they not
<
lb
/>
to have ſaid, that its natural affection is to reſt immoveable,
<
lb
/>
ther than to make natural unto it the motion ^{*} downwards, with
<
lb
/>
which motion it never did or ſhall move? </
s
>
<
s
>And as to the motion
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg96
"/>
<
lb
/>
by a right line, they muſt grant us that Nature maketh uſe of it
<
lb
/>
to reduce the ſmall parts of the Earth, Water, Air, Fire, and every
<
lb
/>
other integral Mundane body to their
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Whole,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
when any of them
<
lb
/>
by chance are ſeparated, and ſo tranſported out of their proper
<
lb
/>
place; if alſo haply, ſome circular motion might not be found
<
lb
/>
to be more convenient to make this reſtitution. </
s
>
<
s
>In my
<
lb
/>
ment, this primary poſition anſwers much better, even according
<
lb
/>
to
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotles
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
own method, to all the other conſequences, than
<
lb
/>
to attribute the ſtraight motion to be an intrinſick and natural </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>