Galilei, Galileo
,
Discourse concerning the natation of bodies
,
1663
Text
Text Image
XML
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 77
>
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 77
>
page
|<
<
of 77
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
pagenum
="
403
"/>
greate heate, or exalting of the voyce, either are not underſtood,
<
lb
/>
or elſe being tranſported by oſtentation of not yeilding to one
<
lb
/>
ther, farr from the firſt Propoſition, with the novelty, of the
<
lb
/>
various Propoſals, confound both themſelves and their Auditors.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Moreover, it ſeemed to me convenient to informe your
<
lb
/>
neſſe of all the ſequell, concerning the Controverſie of which I
<
lb
/>
treat, as it hath been advertiſed often already by others: and becauſe
<
lb
/>
the Doctrine which I follow, in the diſcuſſion of the point in hand,
<
lb
/>
is different from that of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; and interferes with his Principles,
<
lb
/>
I have conſidered that againſt the Authority of that moſt famous
<
lb
/>
Man, which amongſt many makes all ſuſpected that comes not from
<
lb
/>
the Schooles of the Peripateticks, its farr better to give ones Reaſons
<
lb
/>
by the Pen than by word of mouth and therfore I reſolved to write the
<
lb
/>
preſent diſcourſe: in which yet I hope to demonſtrate that it was not
<
lb
/>
out of capritiouſneſſe, or for that I had not read or underſtood
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that I ſometimes ſwerve from his opinion, but becauſe
<
lb
/>
ſeverall Reaſons perſwade me to it, and the ſame
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
hath </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1396
"/>
<
lb
/>
tought me to fix my judgment on that which is grounded upon
<
lb
/>
Reaſon, and not on the bare Authority of the Maſter; and it is
<
lb
/>
moſt certaine according to the ſentence of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Alcinoos,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1397
"/>
<
lb
/>
ting ſhould be free. </
s
>
<
s
>Nor is the reſolution of our Queſtion in my
<
lb
/>
judgment without ſome benefit to the Univerſall, foraſmuch as
<
lb
/>
treating whether the figure of Solids operates, or not, in their going,
<
lb
/>
or not going to the bottome in Water, in occurrences of building
<
lb
/>
Bridges or other Fabricks on the Water, which happen commonly
<
lb
/>
in affairs of grand import, it may be of great availe to know the
<
lb
/>
truth.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1396
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
prefers
<
lb
/>
Reaſon to the
<
lb
/>
Authority ofan
<
lb
/>
Author.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1397
"/>
The benefit of
<
lb
/>
this Argument.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>I ſay therfore, that being the laſt Summer in company with certain
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1398
"/>
<
lb
/>
Learned men, it was ſaid in the argumentation; That Condenſation
<
lb
/>
was the propriety of Cold, and there was alledged for inſtance, the
<
lb
/>
example of Ice: now I at that time ſaid, that, in my judgment,
<
lb
/>
the Ice ſhould be rather Water rarified than condenſed, and my
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1399
"/>
<
lb
/>
reaſon was, becauſe Condenſation begets diminution of Maſs, and
<
lb
/>
augmentation of gravity, and Rarifaction cauſeth greater Lightneſs,
<
lb
/>
and augmentarion of Maſſe: and Water in freezing, encreaſeth in
<
lb
/>
Maſſe, and the Ice made thereby is lighter than the Water on which
<
lb
/>
it ſwimmeth.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1398
"/>
Condenſation
<
lb
/>
the Propriety of
<
lb
/>
Cold, according
<
lb
/>
to the
<
lb
/>
ticks.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1399
"/>
Ice rather water
<
lb
/>
rarified, than
<
lb
/>
condenſed, and
<
lb
/>
why:</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
What I ſay, is manifeſt, becauſe, the medium ſubtracting from the
<
lb
/>
whole Gravity of Sollids the weight of ſuch another Maſſe of the ſaid
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1400
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Medium; was
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
proves in his ^{*} Firſt Booke
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
De Inſidentibus
<
lb
/>
Humido;
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
when ever the Maſſe of the ſaid Solid encreaſeth by Diſtraction,
<
lb
/>
the more ſhall the
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Medium
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
detract from its entire Gravity; and leſſe,
<
lb
/>
when by Compreſſion it ſhall be condenſed and reduced to a leſſe Maſſe.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
"/>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>