Alberti, Leone Battista
,
Architecture
,
1755
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
>
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 210
211 - 220
221 - 230
231 - 240
241 - 250
251 - 260
261 - 270
271 - 280
281 - 290
291 - 300
301 - 310
311 - 320
>
page
|<
<
of 320
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
003/01/040.jpg
"
pagenum
="
29
"/>
affirmed that the Cypreſs never ſuffers either
<
lb
/>
by Worms or Age, and never ſplits of its own
<
lb
/>
accord. </
s
>
<
s
>For this Reaſon
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Plato
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
was of Opinion,
<
lb
/>
that the publick Laws and Statutes ſhould be
<
lb
/>
carved in ſacred Tables of Cypreſs, believing
<
lb
/>
they would be more laſting than Tables of
<
lb
/>
Braſs. </
s
>
<
s
>This Topick naturally leads me to give
<
lb
/>
an Account of what I myſelf remember to
<
lb
/>
have read and obſerv'd of this Wood. </
s
>
<
s
>It is re
<
lb
/>
lated that the Gates of the Temple of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Diana,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
at
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Epheſus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
being of Cypreſs, laſted four hun
<
lb
/>
dred Years, and preſerved their Beauty in ſuch
<
lb
/>
a Manner that they always ſeemed to be new.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>In the Church of St.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Peter
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
at
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Rome,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
upon the
<
lb
/>
repairing of the Gates by Pope
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Eugenius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
I
<
lb
/>
found, that where they had not been injured
<
lb
/>
by the Violence of the Enemy in ſtripping a
<
lb
/>
way the Silver with which they were formerly
<
lb
/>
covered, they had continued whole and ſound
<
lb
/>
above five hundred and fifty Years; for if we
<
lb
/>
examing the Annals of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Roman
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Pontiffs, ſo
<
lb
/>
long it is from the Time of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Hadrian
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
the Third,
<
lb
/>
who ſet them up, to
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Eugene
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
the Fourth. </
s
>
<
s
>There
<
lb
/>
fore, though the Fir is very much commended
<
lb
/>
for making Rafters, yet the Cypreſs is prefer
<
lb
/>
red before it, perhaps only upon this one Ac
<
lb
/>
count, namely, that it is more laſting; but
<
lb
/>
then it is heavier than the Fir. </
s
>
<
s
>The Pine and
<
lb
/>
Pitch Trees alſo are valued, for the Pine is
<
lb
/>
ſuppoſed to have the ſame Quality as the Fir,
<
lb
/>
of riſing againſt the Weight that is laid upon
<
lb
/>
it: But between the Fir and the Pine there is
<
lb
/>
this Difference, among others, that the Firs is
<
lb
/>
leſs injured by Worms, becauſe the Pine is of a
<
lb
/>
ſweeter Juice than the Fir. </
s
>
<
s
>I do not know
<
lb
/>
any Wood that is to be preferred to the Larch,
<
lb
/>
or Turpentine Tree, which, within my Obſer
<
lb
/>
vation, has ſupported Buildings perfectly ſtrong,
<
lb
/>
and to a very great Age, in many Places, and
<
lb
/>
particularly in thoſe very ancient Structures in
<
lb
/>
the Market-place at
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Venice,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and indeed this one
<
lb
/>
Tree is reckoned to be furniſhed with the Con
<
lb
/>
veniences of all the Reſt; it is nervous, tena
<
lb
/>
cious of its Strength, unmoveable in Storms,
<
lb
/>
not moleſted with Worms; and it is an anci
<
lb
/>
ent Opinion, that againſt the Injuries of Fire
<
lb
/>
it remains invincible, and in a Manner unhurt,
<
lb
/>
inſomuch that they adviſe us, on whatever Side
<
lb
/>
we are apprehenſive of Fire, to place Beams of
<
lb
/>
Larch by Way of Security. </
s
>
<
s
>It is true I have
<
lb
/>
ſeen it take Fire and burn, but yet in ſuch a
<
lb
/>
Manner that it ſeemed to diſdain the Flames,
<
lb
/>
and to threaten to drive them away. </
s
>
<
s
>It has
<
lb
/>
indeed one Defect, which is, that in Sea-wa
<
lb
/>
ter it is very apt to breed Worms. </
s
>
<
s
>For Beams
<
lb
/>
the Oak and Olive are accounted improper,
<
lb
/>
becauſe of their Heavineſs, and that they give
<
lb
/>
Way beneath the Weight that is laid upon
<
lb
/>
them, and are apt to warp even of themſelves;
<
lb
/>
beſides, all Trees that are more inclinable to
<
lb
/>
break into Shivers than to ſplit, are unfit for
<
lb
/>
Beams; ſuch are the Olive, the Fig, the Lin
<
lb
/>
den, the Sallow, and the like. </
s
>
<
s
>It is a ſurpriz
<
lb
/>
ing Property which they relate of the Palm
<
lb
/>
Tree, that it riſes againſt the Weight that is
<
lb
/>
laid upon it, and bends upwards in ſpite of all
<
lb
/>
Reſiſtance. </
s
>
<
s
>For Beams and Coverings ex
<
lb
/>
poſed to the open Air, the Juniper is greatly
<
lb
/>
commended; and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Pliny
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſays it has the ſame
<
lb
/>
Properties as the Cedar, but is ſounder. </
s
>
<
s
>The
<
lb
/>
Olive too is reckoned extreamly durable, and
<
lb
/>
the Box is eſteemed as one of the Beſt of all.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>Nor is the Cheſnut, though apt to cleave and
<
lb
/>
ſplit, rejected for Works to the open Air. </
s
>
<
s
>But
<
lb
/>
the wild Olive they particularly eſteem ſor the
<
lb
/>
ſame Reaſon as the Cypreſs, becauſe it never
<
lb
/>
breeds Worms, which is the Advantage of all
<
lb
/>
Trees that have oily and gummy Juices, eſpe
<
lb
/>
cially if thoſe Juices are bitter. </
s
>
<
s
>The Worm
<
lb
/>
never enters into ſuch Trees, and it is certain
<
lb
/>
they exclude all Moiſture from without. </
s
>
<
s
>Con
<
lb
/>
trary to theſe are ſuppoſed to be all Woods
<
lb
/>
that have Juices of a ſweet Taſte, and which
<
lb
/>
eaſily take Fire; out of which, nevertheleſs,
<
lb
/>
they except the ſweet as well as the wild Olive.
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Vitruvius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſays, that the Holm Oak and Beech
<
lb
/>
are very weak in their Nature againſt Storms,
<
lb
/>
and do not endure to a great Age.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Pliny
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſays,
<
lb
/>
that the Maſt-holm ſoon rots. </
s
>
<
s
>But the Fir,
<
lb
/>
and particularly that which grows in the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Alps,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
for Uſes within Doors, as for Bedſteads, Ta
<
lb
/>
bles, Doors, Benches, and the like, is excel
<
lb
/>
lent; becauſe it is, in its Nature, very dry, and
<
lb
/>
very tenacious of the Glue. </
s
>
<
s
>The Pitch-Tree
<
lb
/>
and Cypreſs alſo are very good for ſuch Uſes;
<
lb
/>
the Beech for other Service is too brittle, but
<
lb
/>
does mighty well for Coffers and Beds, and
<
lb
/>
will ſaw into extreme thin Planks, as will like
<
lb
/>
wiſe the Scarlet-Oak. </
s
>
<
s
>The Cheſnut, on the
<
lb
/>
Contrary, the Elm, and the Aſh are reckoned
<
lb
/>
very unfit for Planks, becauſe they eaſily ſplit,
<
lb
/>
and though they ſplit ſlowly, they are very in
<
lb
/>
clinable to it; though elſe the Aſh is account
<
lb
/>
ed very obedient in all Manner of Works. </
s
>
<
s
>But
<
lb
/>
I am ſurprized the Ancients have not celebra
<
lb
/>
ted the Nut Tree; which, as Experience ſhews
<
lb
/>
us, is extremely tractable, and good for moſt
<
lb
/>
Uſes, and eſpecially for Boards or Planks,
<
lb
/>
They commend the Mulberry-Tree, both for
<
lb
/>
its Durableneſs, and becauſe by Length of </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>