Borro, Girolamo, De motu gravium et levium, 1575

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
< >
page |< < of 316 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <subchap1>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="s.000262">
                  <pb pagenum="21" xlink:href="011/01/041.jpg"/>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                quæ fieri non queunt, erit ſententia Anaxagoræ: & ſola A­
                  <lb/>
                riſtotelis inexpugnabilis veritas laudibus extollenda: qui dixis
                  <lb/>
                in vnoquoque elemento, immo in vnoquoque corpore naturali
                  <lb/>
                eſſe motum naturalem, quo non violenter, non contra
                  <expan abbr="naturã">naturam</expan>
                ,
                  <lb/>
                ſed ſua propria ſponte ea corpora moueantur.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
            <subchap1>
              <p type="head">
                <s id="s.000263">In Parmenidem vbi de neceſsitate cauſæ mouen­
                  <lb/>
                tis, deque idearum vanitate agitur. </s>
                <s id="s.000264">Cap. XIII.</s>
              </p>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="s.000265">PARMENIDES
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                ſuum illud vnum, quod omnia eſſe
                  <lb/>
                constantissimè affirmauit, hoc argumento, nullo motu
                  <lb/>
                cieri poſſe probauit. </s>
                <s id="s.000266">Omne, quod mouetur (ait) per ſpa
                  <lb/>
                cium innane mouetur: extra quod nihil moueri poteſt: ſed ſpa­
                  <lb/>
                cium innane non datur: ergo nihil mouetur: ergo omnia, quæ
                  <lb/>
                ſunt vnum, nullo motu cieri poſſunt. </s>
                <s id="s.000267">Confirmari valet Par­
                  <lb/>
                menidis opinio: quia omne, quod mouetur, ab vno moueri inci
                  <lb/>
                pit, per vnum medium fertur, & ad vnum terminum tendit,
                  <lb/>
                quæ neceſſariò eſſe distincta oportet: inde colligere licet; quod
                  <lb/>
                mobile non eſt idem cum eo, à quo, & ad quod, & per quod fit
                  <lb/>
                motus: ſed hæc quatuor inter ſe maximè differunt: verum
                  <lb/>
                omnia eſſe vnum, quæcumque ſint illa, Parmenides constan­
                  <lb/>
                tiſsimè credit: ergo nihil mouetur: His mediis motum ab vni
                  <lb/>
                uerſa natura abstuliſſe Parmenides putat. </s>
                <s id="s.000268">Sed errat propte
                  <lb/>
                rea quod, non ſemel, ſed ſæpenumero id petit, quod erat in prin
                  <lb/>
                cipio: ſunt enim tamquam axiomata apud Parmenidem per
                  <lb/>
                ſe nota. </s>
                <s id="s.000269">Nihil eſſe inane, & omne quod mouetur, per ina­
                  <lb/>
                ne ſpacium ſolummodo cieri: quæ duo tantum ab eſt, vt ſint
                  <lb/>
                perſe nota, vt demoſtratione indigeant: quo fit, vt ex illis dua­
                  <lb/>
                bus propoſitionibus, quarum altera obſcurissima illa quidem
                  <lb/>
                est, altera verò falſissima, non eſſe motum colligere nulla artis
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>