Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
Scan
Original
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/044.jpg
"
pagenum
="
38
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
per ſe
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; but if the concluſion be falſe, a man may proceed
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in
<
lb
/>
finitum,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and never meet with any truth already known; but
<
lb
/>
ry oft he ſhall meet with ſome impoſſibility or manifeſt
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg106
"/>
<
lb
/>
ty. </
s
>
<
s
>Nor need you queſtion but that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Pythagoras
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
along time
<
lb
/>
fore he found the demonſtration for which he offered the
<
lb
/>
tomb, had been certain, that the ſquare of the ſide ſubtending
<
lb
/>
the right angle in a rectangle triangle, was equal to the ſquare of
<
lb
/>
the other two ſides: and the certainty of the concluſion
<
lb
/>
ced not a little to the inveſtigating of the demonſtration,
<
lb
/>
derſtanding me alwayes to mean in demonſtrative Sciences. </
s
>
<
s
>But
<
lb
/>
what ever was the method of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and whether his arguing
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
à
<
lb
/>
priori
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
preceded ſenſe
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
à poſteriori,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
or the contrary; it ſufficeth that
<
lb
/>
the ſame
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
preferreth (as hath been oft ſaid) ſenſible
<
lb
/>
periments before all diſcourſes; beſides, as to the Arugments
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
à
<
lb
/>
priori
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
their force hath been already examined. </
s
>
<
s
>Now returning
<
lb
/>
to my purpoſed matter, I ſay, that the things in our times
<
lb
/>
covered in the Heavens, are, and have been ſuch, that they may
<
lb
/>
give abſolute ſatisfaction to all Philoſophers; foraſmuch as in
<
lb
/>
the particular bodies, and in the univerſal expanſion of Heaven,
<
lb
/>
there have been, and are continually, ſeen juſt ſuch accidents as
<
lb
/>
we call generations and corruptions, being that excellent
<
lb
/>
ſtronomers have obſerved many Comets generated and diſſolved
<
lb
/>
in parts higher than the Lunar Orb, beſides the two new Stars,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg107
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Anuo
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
1572, and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Anno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
1604, without contradiction much higher
<
lb
/>
than all the Planets; and in the face of the Sun it ſelf, by help
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg108
"/>
<
lb
/>
of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Teleſcope,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
certain denſe and obſcure ſubſtances, in
<
lb
/>
blance very like to the foggs about the Earth, are ſeen to be
<
lb
/>
produced and diſſolved; and many of theſe are ſo vaſt, that
<
lb
/>
they far exceed not only the Mediterranian Streight, but all
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg109
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Affrica
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Aſia
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
alſo. </
s
>
<
s
>Now if
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
had ſeen theſe things,
<
lb
/>
what think you he would have ſaid, and done
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius?
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg105
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The certaixty of
<
lb
/>
the concluſion
<
lb
/>
peth by areſolutive
<
lb
/>
method to ſind the
<
lb
/>
demonstration.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg106
"/>
Pythagoras
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
offered
<
lb
/>
an Hecatomb for
<
lb
/>
a Geometrical
<
lb
/>
monſtration which
<
lb
/>
he found.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg107
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
New ſtars
<
lb
/>
vered in Heaven.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg108
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Spots generate and
<
lb
/>
diſſolve in the face
<
lb
/>
of the Sun.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg109
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Solar spots are
<
lb
/>
bigger than all
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſia
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Affrick.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>I know not what
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
would have done or ſaid,
<
lb
/>
that was the great Maſter of all the Sciences, but yet I know in
<
lb
/>
part, what his Sectators do and ſay, and ought to do and ſay,
<
lb
/>
unleſſe they would deprive themſelves of their guide, leader, and
<
lb
/>
Prince in Philoſophy. </
s
>
<
s
>As to the Comets, are not thoſe Modern
<
lb
/>
Aſtronomers, who would make them Cœleſtial, convinced by
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg110
"/>
<
lb
/>
the ^{*}
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Anti-Tycho,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
yea, and overcome with their own weapons, I
<
lb
/>
mean by way of Paralaxes and Calculations, every way tryed,
<
lb
/>
concluding at the laſt in favour of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Aristotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that they are all
<
lb
/>
Elementary? </
s
>
<
s
>And this being overthrown, which was as it were
<
lb
/>
their foundation, have theſe Novelliſts any thing more
<
lb
/>
with to maintain their aſſertion?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg110
"/>
*
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Aſtronomers
<
lb
/>
futed by
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
cho.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Hold a little, good
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
this modern Author,
<
lb
/>
what ſaith he to the new Stars,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Anno
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
1572, and 1604, and to </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>