Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/473.jpg
"
pagenum
="
449
"/>
cauſe being joyned to it, and conſequently having a ſhare in eve
<
lb
/>
ry of its motions, we cannot immediately diſcern them in her, but
<
lb
/>
are forced to refer them to the Celeſtial Bodies in which they
<
lb
/>
appear; therefore we call them as if they were made there, where
<
lb
/>
they ſeem to us to be made. </
s
>
<
s
>Whence it is to be noted how ne
<
lb
/>
neſſary it is to accommodate our diſcourſe to our old and accu
<
lb
/>
ſtomed manner of underſtanding.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg839
"/>
(k)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Quaſi non
<
lb
/>
multa in Scriptu
<
lb
/>
ris Sanctis dican
<
lb
/>
tur juxta opinio
<
lb
/>
nem illius tempor is
<
lb
/>
quo geſt a referant,
<
lb
/>
& non juxta quod
<
lb
/>
rei veritas contine
<
lb
/>
bat.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
D. Hiero. </
s
>
<
s
>in c.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>28. Jerem.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg840
"/>
(l)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Conſuctudi
<
lb
/>
nis Scripturarum
<
lb
/>
eſt, ut opinionem
<
lb
/>
multarum rerum
<
lb
/>
ſic narret Hiſtori
<
lb
/>
cus, quomodo eo
<
lb
/>
tempore ab omni
<
lb
/>
bus credebatur.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
In
<
lb
/>
cap. 13. Matth.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg841
"/>
* D. Thomas, in
<
lb
/>
cap. </
s
>
<
s
>26. Job. </
s
>
<
s
>v. </
s
>
<
s
>7.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>That, in the next place, the common conſent of Fathers, in re
<
lb
/>
ceiving a Natural Propoſition of Scripture, all in the ſame ſenſe
<
lb
/>
ought to Authorize it ſo far, as to make it become a matter of
<
lb
/>
Faith to believe it to be ^{*} ſo, I ſhould think that it ought at moſt
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg842
"/>
<
lb
/>
to be underſtood of thoſe Concluſions onely, which have beenby
<
lb
/>
the ſaid Fathers diſcuſſed, and ſifted with all poſſible diligence,
<
lb
/>
and debated on the one ſide, and on the other, and all things in
<
lb
/>
the end concurring to diſprove the one, and prove the other. </
s
>
<
s
>But
<
lb
/>
the Mobility of the Earth, and Stability of the Sun, are not of
<
lb
/>
this kinde; For, that the ſaid Opinion was in thoſe times total
<
lb
/>
ly buried, and never brought amongſt the Queſtions of the Schools,
<
lb
/>
and not conſidered, much leſs followed by any one: So that it is to
<
lb
/>
be believed that it never ſo much as entered into the thought of
<
lb
/>
the Fathers to diſpute it, the Places of Scripture, their own Opinion,
<
lb
/>
and the aſſent of men having all concurred in the ſame judgement,
<
lb
/>
without the contradiction of any one, ſo far as we can finde.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg842
"/>
* Namely, ac
<
lb
/>
cording to the Lit
<
lb
/>
teral Senſe.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Beſides, it is not enough to ſay that the Fathers all admit the
<
lb
/>
ſtability of the Earth, &c. </
s
>
<
s
>Therefore to believe it is a matter of
<
lb
/>
Faith: But its neceſſary to prove that they have condemned the
<
lb
/>
contrary Opinion: For I may affirm and bide by this, That their
<
lb
/>
not having occaſion to make ſatisfaction upon the ſame, and to
<
lb
/>
diſcuſs it, hath made them to omit and admit it, onely as cur
<
lb
/>
rent, but not as reſolved and proved And I think I have very
<
lb
/>
good Reaſon for what I ſay; For either the Fathers did make
<
lb
/>
reflection upon this Concluſion as controverted, or not: If not,
<
lb
/>
then they could determin nothing concerning it no not in their
<
lb
/>
private thoughts; and their incogitance doth not oblige us to
<
lb
/>
receive thoſe Precepts which they have not, ſo much as in their
<
lb
/>
intentions enjoyned. </
s
>
<
s
>But if they did reflect and conſider there
<
lb
/>
on, they would long ſince have condemned it, if they had judged
<
lb
/>
it erroneous; which we do not find that they have done. </
s
>
<
s
>Nay, after
<
lb
/>
that ſome Divines have began to conſider it, we find that they
<
lb
/>
have not deem'd it erroneous; as we read in the Commentaries of
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Didacus a Stunica
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
upon
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Job,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Cap. 9, v. </
s
>
<
s
>6.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
on the words,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Qui com
<
lb
/>
movet Terram de loco ſuo,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
&c. </
s
>
<
s
>Where he at large diſcourſeth upon
<
lb
/>
the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Copernican
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Hypotheſis, and concludeth,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
That the Mobility
<
lb
/>
of the Earth, is not contrary to Scripture.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Withal, I may juſtly queſtion the truth of that determination,
<
lb
/>
namely, That the Church enjoyneth us to hold ſuch like Natural </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>