Clavius, Christoph, In Sphaeram Ioannis de Sacro Bosco commentarius

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
491 454
492 455
493 456
494 457
495 458
496 459
497 460
498 461
499 462
500 463
501 464
502 465
503 466
504 467
505 468
506 469
507 470
508 471
509 472
510 473
511 474
512 475
513 476
514 477
515 478
516 479
517 480
518 481
519 482
520 483
< >
page |< < (456) of 525 > >|
    <echo version="1.0RC">
      <text xml:lang="la" type="free">
        <div xml:id="echoid-div892" type="section" level="1" n="358">
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17268" xml:space="preserve">
              <pb o="456" file="492" n="493" rhead="Comment. in IIII. Cap. Sphæræ"/>
            ſimpliciter, ita ut alium motum non habeant, quàm totum cælũ planetæ. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17269" xml:space="preserve">Ha-
              <lb/>
            beret autem uim argumentum, ſi Eccentricus ſimpliciter quieſceret, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17270" xml:space="preserve">Eccen
              <lb/>
            trici ſecundum quid circunſtantes mouerentur, quod uerum non eſt.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17271" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <note position="left" xml:space="preserve">Solutio 4.
            <lb/>
          obiectionis</note>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17272" xml:space="preserve">
              <emph style="sc">Ad</emph>
            quartam obiectionem reſpondendum eſt, Ariſtotelẽ ſemper eius fuiſ-
              <lb/>
            ſe ſententiæ, ut in rebus Aſtronomicis conſulendos eſſe Aſtronomos cenſe-
              <lb/>
            ret. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17273" xml:space="preserve">Vnde tunc ſecutus eſt Aſtronomos ſui temporis, nempe Eudoxum, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17274" xml:space="preserve">Ca-
              <lb/>
            lippum, qui nitebantur omnia φαινόμενα tueri per circulos concentricos. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17275" xml:space="preserve">Nõ
              <lb/>
            dubito autem, quin, ſi tempore Ptolemęi extitiſſet, amplexus fuiſſet Eccentri-
              <lb/>
            cos, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17276" xml:space="preserve">Epicyclos, quandoquidem omnia commodiſſime ea ratione defendun
              <lb/>
            tur. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17277" xml:space="preserve">Semper enim affirmat; </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17278" xml:space="preserve">in rebus Aſtronomicis Aſtronomis fidem eſſe ha-
              <lb/>
            bendam.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17279" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17280" xml:space="preserve">
              <emph style="sc">Ad</emph>
            quintam rationem dicimus, illam opinionem, quòd cælum in loco ſit
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-492-02" xlink:href="note-492-02a" xml:space="preserve">Solutio 5.
                <lb/>
              obiectionis</note>
            per centrum, propriam eſſe Auuerrois. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17281" xml:space="preserve">Vnde ſi illam uelimus acceptare, nihil
              <lb/>
            contra nos concludit argumentum. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17282" xml:space="preserve">Si quis tamen eam opinionem defendere
              <lb/>
            uoluerit, poterit dicere, Eccentricos etiam orbes, atque Epicyclos eſſe in loco
              <lb/>
            per ſua centra. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17283" xml:space="preserve">Centrum autem mundi eſſe locum totalium cælorum, non au
              <lb/>
            tem orbium partialium. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17284" xml:space="preserve">Si uero urgeat quis, eundem eſſe locum totius, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17285" xml:space="preserve">par
              <lb/>
            tium, illud intelligendum eſt de loco communi, non autem de proprio. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17286" xml:space="preserve">Pars
              <lb/>
            enim quęlibet lapidis eundem locum habet cum lapide communem, non aũt
              <lb/>
            eundem locum proprium, cum locus debeat eſſe locato æqualis. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17287" xml:space="preserve">Sic igitur ſi
              <lb/>
            tueri quis uelit ſententiam Auerrois, dicere poterit, locum communem om
              <lb/>
            niũ ſphærarum tam partialium, quàm totalium, non eſſe centrum mundi: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17288" xml:space="preserve">ſed
              <lb/>
            centrum abſolute, quodcuuque illud ſit, uel certe aggregatũ ex omnibus cen
              <lb/>
            tris: </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17289" xml:space="preserve">atque ita eas ha bere eundem locũ communem, nimirum, centrum, quem
              <lb/>
            libet tamen orbem habere proprium locum, nempe centrum proprium.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17290" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17291" xml:space="preserve">
              <emph style="sc">Ad</emph>
            ſextum argumentum reſpondemus, non ſolum ſecundum orbes Eccẽ
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-492-03" xlink:href="note-492-03a" xml:space="preserve">Solutio 6.
                <lb/>
              obìectionis</note>
            tricos, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17292" xml:space="preserve">Epicyclos Solẽ pauciores motus habere, quàm ſuperiores planetas,
              <lb/>
            ſed etiam ſecundum concentricos, ut conſtat ex Fracaſtorio cap. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17293" xml:space="preserve">24. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17294" xml:space="preserve">ubi nume
              <lb/>
            rum orbium percenſet. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17295" xml:space="preserve">Vnde negamus, orbes cæleſtes, quo inferiores ſunt eo
              <lb/>
            pluribus debere motibus cieri, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17296" xml:space="preserve">eo paucioribus, quo ſuperiores, cũ experien-
              <lb/>
            tia contrarium docuerit, ut & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17297" xml:space="preserve">aduerſarij fatentur.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17298" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17299" xml:space="preserve">
              <emph style="sc">Ad</emph>
            obiectionem ſeptimam negandum eſt, terram quieſcentem neceſſariã
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-492-04" xlink:href="note-492-04a" xml:space="preserve">Solutio 7.
                <lb/>
              obiectionis</note>
            eſſe in quolibet centro, ut circa illam orbes cæleſtes moueantur, Quamuis
              <lb/>
            Deus Opt. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17300" xml:space="preserve">Max. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17301" xml:space="preserve">terram hanc uel omnino auferret, uel aliò impelleret extra
              <lb/>
            centrum mundi, adhuc cęli motu diurno ueherentur circa medium mundi.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17302" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17303" xml:space="preserve">
              <emph style="sc">Ad</emph>
            octauum argumentum dicendum eſt, duos orbes eccentricos ſecun-
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-492-05" xlink:href="note-492-05a" xml:space="preserve">Solutio 8.
                <lb/>
              obiectionis</note>
            dum quid neceſſarios eſſe, ut totum cælum planetæ mundo concentricum in-
              <lb/>
            tegrent, ac compleant Vnde neuter eorum ſuperuacaneus cenſeri debet. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17304" xml:space="preserve">To-
              <lb/>
            tum enim cælum, quod ex illis componitur, proprium motum habet. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17305" xml:space="preserve">Non au
              <lb/>
            tem ſolum hi orbes ponuntur, ut augem deferant, eiuſque oppoſitum, quod
              <lb/>
            falſo obiectio affumit.</s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17306" xml:space="preserve"/>
          </p>
          <p>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17307" xml:space="preserve">
              <emph style="sc">Iam</emph>
            uero, quod ad tria argumenta Fracaſtorij attinet, dicimus, primũ ni
              <lb/>
              <note position="left" xlink:label="note-492-06" xlink:href="note-492-06a" xml:space="preserve">Solutio 1.
                <lb/>
              obiectionis
                <lb/>
              Fracaſtorij</note>
            hil concludere in Sole. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17308" xml:space="preserve">Quoniam enim Sol tantam diſtantiam habet à terra,
              <lb/>
            ut uel nullam aſpectus diuerſitatẽ, uel certe inſenſibilem admittat, fit ut cum
              <lb/>
            planũ Eccentrici ipſius ſemper in plano Eclipticæ iaceat, (ut in Theoricis ex
              <lb/>
            plicabitur.) </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17309" xml:space="preserve">perpetuo appareat ſub Ecliptica, ſi è terra conſpiciatur. </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17310" xml:space="preserve">Vnde quã
              <lb/>
            do eſt in principio ♋, uel ♑, uidebitur eoſdẽ parallelos motu diurno deſcri-
              <lb/>
            bere, quos eadem principia ♋, & </s>
            <s xml:id="echoid-s17311" xml:space="preserve">♑, in primo mobili deſcribunt, qui </s>
          </p>
        </div>
      </text>
    </echo>
Impressum