Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/053.jpg
"
pagenum
="
37
"/>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I verily believed otherwiſe, and conceited that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
plicius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
diſſembled this expoſition of the Text, that he might not
<
lb
/>
charge his Maſter and Conſectators, with a notion more abſurd
<
lb
/>
than the former. </
s
>
<
s
>And what a folly it is to ſay the Cœleſtial
<
lb
/>
part is unalterable, becauſe no ſtars do generate or corrupt
<
lb
/>
in? </
s
>
<
s
>What then? </
s
>
<
s
>hath any ſeen a Terreſtrial Globe corrupt, and
<
lb
/>
another regenerate in its place? </
s
>
<
s
>And yet is it not on all hands
<
lb
/>
granted by Philoſophers, that there are very few ſtars in Heaven
<
lb
/>
leſs than the Earth, but very many that are much bigger? </
s
>
<
s
>So
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg103
"/>
<
lb
/>
that for a ſtar in Heaven to corrupt, would be no leſs than if the
<
lb
/>
whole Terreſtrial Globe ſhould be deſtroy'd. </
s
>
<
s
>Therefore, if for
<
lb
/>
the true proof of generation and corruption in the Univerſe, it be
<
lb
/>
neceſſary that ſo vaſt bodies as a ſtar, muſt corrupt and
<
lb
/>
rate, you may ſatisfie your ſelf and ceaſe your opinion; for I
<
lb
/>
aſſure you, that you ſhall never ſee the Terreſtrial Globe or any
<
lb
/>
other integral body of the World, to corrupt or decay ſo, that
<
lb
/>
having been beheld by us for ſo many years paſt, they ſhould ſo
<
lb
/>
diſſolve, as not to leave any footſteps of them.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg103
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Its no leſs
<
lb
/>
ble for a ſtar to
<
lb
/>
corrupt, than for
<
lb
/>
the whole
<
lb
/>
ſtrial Globe.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>But to give
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
yet fuller ſatisfaction, and to
<
lb
/>
reclaim him, if poſſible, from his error; I affirm, that we have in
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg104
"/>
<
lb
/>
our age new accidents and obſervations, and ſuch, that I queſtion
<
lb
/>
not in the leaſt, but if
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
were now alive, they would make
<
lb
/>
him change his opinion; which may be eaſily collected from the
<
lb
/>
very manner of his diſcourſing: For when he writeth that he
<
lb
/>
ſteemeth the Heavens inalterable, &c. </
s
>
<
s
>becauſe no new thing was
<
lb
/>
ſeen to be begot therein, or any old to be diſſolved, he ſeems
<
lb
/>
plicitely to hint unto us, that when he ſhould ſee any ſuch
<
lb
/>
dent, he would hold the contrary; and confront, as indeed it is
<
lb
/>
meet, ſenſible experiments to natural reaſon: for had he not
<
lb
/>
made any reckoning of the ſenſes, he would not then from the
<
lb
/>
not ſeeing of any ſenſible mutation, have argued immutability.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg104
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
would
<
lb
/>
change his opinion,
<
lb
/>
did he ſee the
<
lb
/>
velties of our age.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
deduceth his principal Argument
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
à priori,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſhewing the neceſſity of the inalterability of Heaven by natural,
<
lb
/>
manifeſt and clear principles; and then ſtabliſheth the ſame
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
à
<
lb
/>
ſteriori,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
by ſenſe, and the traditions of the antients.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>This you ſpeak of is the Method he hath obſerved in
<
lb
/>
delivering his Doctrine, but I do not bethink it yet to be that
<
lb
/>
wherewith he invented it; for I do believe for certain, that he
<
lb
/>
firſt procured by help of the ſenſes, ſuch experiments and
<
lb
/>
vations as he could, to aſſure him as much as it was poſſible, of the
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg105
"/>
<
lb
/>
concluſion, and that he afterwards ſought out the means how to
<
lb
/>
demonſtrate it: For this, the uſual courſe in demonſtrative
<
lb
/>
ces, and the reaſon thereof is, becauſe when the concluſion is
<
lb
/>
true, by help of reſolutive Method, one may hit upon ſome
<
lb
/>
poſition before demonſtrated, or come to ſome principle known </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>