Archimedes
,
Natation of bodies
,
1662
Text
Text Image
XML
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 68
>
Scan
Original
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 68
>
page
|<
<
of 68
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
073/01/055.jpg
"
pagenum
="
385
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
to M D, as C Q to Q A: But L B is to B D, by 5 of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
before recited, as C D
<
lb
/>
to D A: It is manifeſt therefore, by the precedent Lemma, that C D is to D Q, as L B is to
<
lb
/>
B M: But as C D is to D Q, ſo is C M to M P: Therefore L B is to B M, as C M to M P:
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1343
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
And it haveing been demonſtrated, that C M is to M P, as C E to E A; L B ſhall be to B M,
<
lb
/>
as C E to E A. </
s
>
<
s
>And in like manner it ſhall be demonstrated that ſo is N O to O F; as alſo the
<
lb
/>
Remainders. </
s
>
<
s
>And that alſo H K is to K E, as C E to E A, doth plainly appeare by the ſame
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
5.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
of
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Archimedes
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
: Which is that that we propounded to be demonſtrated.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1340
"/>
(a)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
By 4. of the
<
lb
/>
ſixth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1341
"/>
(b)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
By 11 of the
<
lb
/>
fifth,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1342
"/>
(c)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
By 14 of the
<
lb
/>
fifth.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1343
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
By 2. of the ſixth
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
head
">
<
s
>LEMMA. VI.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>And, therefore, let the things ſtand as above; and deſcribe
<
lb
/>
yet another like Portion, contained betwixt a Right Line, and
<
lb
/>
the Section of the Rightangled Cone D R C, whoſe Diameter
<
lb
/>
is R S, that it may cut the Line F G in T; and prolong S R
<
lb
/>
unto the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
L
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ine C H in V, which meeteth the Section A B C in
<
lb
/>
X, and E F C in Y. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſay, that B M hath to M D, a propor
<
lb
/>
tion compounded of the proportion that E A hath to A C;
<
lb
/>
and of that which C D hath to D E.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
For, we ſhall firſt demonſtrate, that the Line C H toucheth the Section D R C in the
<
lb
/>
Point C; and that L M is to M D, as alſo N F to F T, and V Y to Y R, as C D is to E D.
<
lb
/>
And, becauſe now that L B is to B M, as C E is to E A; therefore, Compounding and Conver
<
lb
/>
ting, B M ſhall be to L M, as E A to A C: And, as L M is to M D, ſo ſhall C D be to
<
lb
/>
D E: The proportion, therefore, of B M to M D, is compounded of the proportion that
<
lb
/>
B M hath to L M, and of the proportion that L M hath to M D: Therefore, the proportion
<
lb
/>
of B M to M D, ſhall alſo be compounded of the proportion that E A hath to A C, and of
<
lb
/>
that which C D hath to D E. </
s
>
<
s
>In the ſame manner it ſhal be demonſtrated, that O F hath to
<
lb
/>
F T, and alſo X Y to Y R, a proportion compounded of thoſe ſame proportions; and ſo in
<
lb
/>
the reſt: Which was to be demonstrated.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>By which it appeareth that the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
L
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ines ſo drawn; which fall betwixt
<
lb
/>
the Sections A B C and D R C, ſhall be divided by the Section E F C
<
lb
/>
in the ſame Proportion.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>And C B is to B D, as ſix to fifteen.]
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
For we have ſuppoſed that B K is
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1344
"/>
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
double of K D: Wherefore, by Compoſition B D ſhall be to K D as three to one; that is, as
<
lb
/>
fifteen to five: But B D was to K C as fifteen to four; Therefore B D is to D C as fifteen to nine:
<
lb
/>
And, by Converſion of proportion and Convert
<
lb
/>
ing, C B is to B D, as ſix to ſifteen.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1344
"/>
N</
s
>
</
p
>
<
figure
id
="
id.073.01.055.1.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
073/01/055/1.jpg
"
number
="
53
"/>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>And as C B is to B D, ſo is
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1345
"/>
<
lb
/>
E B to B A; and D Z to D A.]
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
For the Triangles C B E and D B A being
<
lb
/>
alike; As C B is to B E, ſo ſhall D B be to B A:
<
lb
/>
And,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Permutando,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
as C B is to B D, ſo ſhall
<
lb
/>
E B be to B A: Againe, as B C is to C E ſo
<
lb
/>
ſhall B D be to D A, And,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Permutando,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
as
<
lb
/>
C B is to B D, ſo ſhall C E, that is, D Z
<
lb
/>
equall to it, be to D A.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1345
"/>
O</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>And of D Z and D A, L I and
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1346
"/>
<
lb
/>
L A are double.]
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
That the Line L A is
<
lb
/>
double of D A, is manifeſt, for that B D is the Diameter of the Portion. </
s
>
<
s
>And that L I is
<
lb
/>
dovble to D Z ſhall be thus demonſtrated. </
s
>
<
s
>For as much as ZD is to D A, as two to five:
<
lb
/>
therefore, Converting and Dividing, A Z, that is, I Z, ſhall be to Z D, as three to two:
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>