Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/058.jpg
"
pagenum
="
42
"/>
they cannot be diſſipated by one ſole converſion about the Sun,
<
lb
/>
which is accompliſhed in leſs than a moneth.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg114
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
In natural
<
lb
/>
ences, the art of
<
lb
/>
Oratory is of no
<
lb
/>
force.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg115
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
An Argument
<
lb
/>
that neceſſarily
<
lb
/>
proveth the Solar
<
lb
/>
ſpots to generate
<
lb
/>
and diſſolwe.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg116
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
A concluſive
<
lb
/>
monſtration, that
<
lb
/>
the ſpots are
<
lb
/>
guous to the body
<
lb
/>
of the Sun.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg117
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The motion of the
<
lb
/>
spots towards the
<
lb
/>
circumference of
<
lb
/>
the Sun appears
<
lb
/>
ſlow.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg118
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The figure of the
<
lb
/>
spots appears
<
lb
/>
row towards the
<
lb
/>
circumference of
<
lb
/>
the Suns
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
diſcus,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
&
<
lb
/>
why.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg119
"/>
* Under this word
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Friend,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
as alſo that
<
lb
/>
of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Academick, &
<
lb
/>
Common Friend,
<
lb
/>
Galilœus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
modeſtly
<
lb
/>
conceals himſelf
<
lb
/>
throughout theſe
<
lb
/>
Dialogues.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg120
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The Solar spots
<
lb
/>
are not ſpherical,
<
lb
/>
but flat like thin
<
lb
/>
plates.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. I, for my part, have not made either ſo long, or ſo
<
lb
/>
exact obſervations, as to enable me to boaſt my ſelf Maſter of the
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Quod ect
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of this matter: but I will more accurately conſider the
<
lb
/>
ſame, and make tryal my ſelf for my own ſatisfaction, whether I
<
lb
/>
can reconcile that which experience ſhews us, with that which
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
teacheth us; for it's a certain Maxim, that two Truths
<
lb
/>
cannot be contrary to one another.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>If you would reconcile that which ſenſe ſheweth you,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg121
"/>
<
lb
/>
with the ſolider Doctrines of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
you will find no great
<
lb
/>
ficulty in the undertaking; and that ſo it is, doth not
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſay, that one cannot treat confidently of the things of Heaven,
<
lb
/>
by reaſon of their great remoteneſs?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg121
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
One cannot
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
(
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſaith
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
Ariſtotle)
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
ſpeak
<
lb
/>
confidently of
<
lb
/>
ven, by reaſon of
<
lb
/>
its great diſtance.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>He expreſly ſaith
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg122
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg122
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
prefers
<
lb
/>
ſenſe before
<
lb
/>
cination.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>And doth he not likewiſe affirm, that we ought to
<
lb
/>
fer that which ſenſe demonſtrates, before all Arguments, though
<
lb
/>
in appearance never ſo well grounded? </
s
>
<
s
>and ſaith he not this
<
lb
/>
without the leaſt doubt or hæſitation?</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>He doth ſo.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Why then, the ſecond of theſe propoſitions, which are
<
lb
/>
both the doctrine of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that ſaith, that ſenſe is to take </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg123
"/>
<
lb
/>
place of Logick, is a doctrine much more ſolid and undoubted,
<
lb
/>
than that other which holdeth the Heavens to be unalterable; and
<
lb
/>
therefore you ſhall argue more
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotelically,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſaying, the
<
lb
/>
vens are alterable, for that ſo my ſenſe telleth me, than if you
<
lb
/>
ſhould ſay, the Heavens are u alterable, for that Logick ſo
<
lb
/>
ded
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Aristotle.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Furthermore, we may diſcourſe of Cœleſtial
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg124
"/>
<
lb
/>
ters much better than
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
; becauſe, he confeſſing the
<
lb
/>
ledg thereof to be difficult to him, by reaſon of their remoteneſs
<
lb
/>
from the ſenſes, he thereby acknowledgeth, that one to whom
<
lb
/>
the ſenſes can better repreſent the ſame, may philoſophate upon
<
lb
/>
them with more certainty. </
s
>
<
s
>Now we by help of the Teleſcope,
<
lb
/>
are brought thirty or forty times nearer to the Heavens, than ever
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
came; ſo that we may diſcover in them an hundred
<
lb
/>
things, which he could not ſee, and amongſt the reſt, theſe ſpots
<
lb
/>
in the Sun, which were to him abſolutely inviſible; therefore
<
lb
/>
we may diſcourſe of the Heavens and Sun, with more certainty
<
lb
/>
than
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtolte.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg123
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Its a doctrine more
<
lb
/>
agreeing with
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
riſtotle,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
to ſay the
<
lb
/>
Heavens are
<
lb
/>
able, than that
<
lb
/>
which affirms
<
lb
/>
them inalterable.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg124
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
We may by help of
<
lb
/>
the
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Teleſcope
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
courſe better of
<
lb
/>
leſtial matters,
<
lb
/>
than
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtot.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſelf.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I ſee into the heart of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and know that he is
<
lb
/>
much moved at the ſtrength of theſe ſo convincing Arguments;
<
lb
/>
but on the other ſide, when he conſidereth the great authority
<
lb
/>
which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
hath won with all men, and remembreth the great
<
lb
/>
number of famous Interpreters, which have made it their buſineſs
<
lb
/>
to explain his ſenſe; and ſeeth other Sciences, ſo neceſſary and </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>