Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
Scan
Original
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 701
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/060.jpg
"
pagenum
="
44
"/>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>Now I remember the reſt, and to proceed, Methinks
<
lb
/>
there are ſome things in the anſwer of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Anti-Tycho,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
worthy of
<
lb
/>
reprehenſion. </
s
>
<
s
>And firſt, if the two New Stars, which he can do
<
lb
/>
no leſs than place in the uppermoſt parts of the Heavens, and
<
lb
/>
which were of a long duration, but finally vaniſhed, give him no
<
lb
/>
obſtruction in maintaining the inalterability of Heaven, in that
<
lb
/>
they were not certain parts thereof, nor mutations made in the
<
lb
/>
antient Stars, why doth he ſet himſelf ſo vigorouſly and earneſtly
<
lb
/>
againſt the Comets, to baniſh them by all ways from the
<
lb
/>
ſtial Regions? </
s
>
<
s
>Was it not enough that he could ſay of them
<
lb
/>
the ſame which he ſpoke of the New ſtars? </
s
>
<
s
>to wit, that in
<
lb
/>
gard they were no certain parts of Heaven, nor mutations made
<
lb
/>
in any of the Stars, they could no wiſe prejudice either Heaven,
<
lb
/>
or the Doctrine of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
? </
s
>
<
s
>Secondly, I am not very well
<
lb
/>
fied of his meaning; when he ſaith that the alterations that ſhould
<
lb
/>
be granted to be made in the Stars, would be deſtructive to the
<
lb
/>
prerogative of Heaven; namely, its incorruptibility,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
&c.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
lb
/>
this, becauſe the Stars are Cœleſtial ſubſtances, as is manifeſt
<
lb
/>
by the conſent of every one; and yet is nothing troubled that
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg127
"/>
<
lb
/>
the ſame alterations ſhould be made ^{*} without the Stars in the reſt
<
lb
/>
of the Cœleſtial expanſion. </
s
>
<
s
>Doth he think that Heaven is no
<
lb
/>
Cœleſtial ſubſtance? </
s
>
<
s
>I, for my part, did believe that the Stars
<
lb
/>
were called Cœleſtial bodies, by reaſon that they were in
<
lb
/>
ven, or for that they were made of the ſubſtance of Heaven;
<
lb
/>
and yet I thought that Heaven was more Cœleſtial than they; in
<
lb
/>
like ſort, as nothing can be ſaid to be more Terreſtrial, or more
<
lb
/>
fiery than the Earth or Fire themſelves. </
s
>
<
s
>And again, in that he
<
lb
/>
ver made any mention of the Solar ſpots, which have been
<
lb
/>
dently demonſtrated to be produced, and diſſolved, and to be
<
lb
/>
neer the Sun, and to turn either with, or about the ſame, I have
<
lb
/>
reaſon to think that this Author probably did write more for others
<
lb
/>
pleaſure, than for his own ſatisfaction; and this I affirm,
<
lb
/>
much as he having ſhewn himſelf to be skilful in the
<
lb
/>
ticks, it is impoſſible but that he ſhould have been convinced by
<
lb
/>
Demonſtrations, that thoſe ſubſtances are of neceſſity
<
lb
/>
ous with the body of the Sun, and are ſo great generations and
<
lb
/>
corruptions, that none comparable to them, ever happen in the
<
lb
/>
Earth: And if ſuch, ſo many, and ſo frequent be made in the
<
lb
/>
very Globe of the Sun, which may with reaſon be held one of the
<
lb
/>
nobleſt parts of Heaven, what ſhould make us think that others
<
lb
/>
may not happen in the other
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg128
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg127
"/>
* Ex tra Stellas.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg128
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Generability and
<
lb
/>
alteration is a
<
lb
/>
greater perfection
<
lb
/>
in the Worlds
<
lb
/>
dies than the
<
lb
/>
trary qualities.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>I cannot without great admiration, nay more,
<
lb
/>
al of my underſtanding, hear it to be attributed to natural bodies,
<
lb
/>
for a great honour and perfection that they are ^{*} impaſſible,
<
lb
/>
mutable, inalterable,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
&c.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
And on the contrary, to hear it to </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg129
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>