Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
Scan
Original
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/060.jpg
"
pagenum
="
54
"/>
ſmalneſſe of the body of this, in compariſon to the magnitude
<
lb
/>
of the other, it cannot be denied but that the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
will
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and as it
<
lb
/>
were
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
valour
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
of this, is very great. </
s
>
<
s
>Thus much for their
<
lb
/>
gruities or reſemblances. </
s
>
<
s
>It ſhould next follow that we diſcourſe
<
lb
/>
touching their diſparity; but becauſe
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
will favour us
<
lb
/>
with his objections againſt the former, its neceſſary that we hear
<
lb
/>
and examine them, before we proceed any farther.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg156
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Seventhly, The
<
lb
/>
Earth and Moon
<
lb
/>
do mutually eclipſe.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>And the rather, becauſe it is to be ſuppoſed that
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
will not any wayes oppoſe the diſparities, and
<
lb
/>
gruities betwixt the Earth and Moon, ſince that he accounts their
<
lb
/>
ſubſtances extremely different.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SIMPL. </
s
>
<
s
>Amongſt the reſemblances by you recited, in the
<
lb
/>
rallel you make betwixt the Earth and Moon, I find that I can
<
lb
/>
admit none confidently ſave onely the firſt, and two others; I
<
lb
/>
grant the firſt, namely, the ſpherical figure; howbeit, even in
<
lb
/>
this there is ſome kind of difference, for that I hold that of the
<
lb
/>
Moon to be very ſmooth and even, as a looking-glaſſe,
<
lb
/>
as, we find and feel this of the Earth to be extraordinary
<
lb
/>
ous and rugged; but this belonging to the inequality of
<
lb
/>
cies, it ſhall be anon conſidered, in another of thoſe
<
lb
/>
ces by you alledged; I ſhall therefore reſerve what I have to ſay
<
lb
/>
thereof, till I come to the conſideration of that. </
s
>
<
s
>Of what you
<
lb
/>
affirm next, that the Moon ſeemeth, as you ſay in your ſecond
<
lb
/>
Reſemblance, opacous and obſcure in its ſelf, like the Earth; I
<
lb
/>
admit not any more than the firſt attribute of opacity, of which
<
lb
/>
the Eclipſes of the Sun aſſure me. </
s
>
<
s
>For were the Moon
<
lb
/>
rent, the air in the total obſcuration of the Sun, would not
<
lb
/>
come ſo duskiſh, as at ſuch a time it is, but by means of the
<
lb
/>
tranſparency of the body of the Moon, a refracted light would
<
lb
/>
paſſe through it, as we ſee it doth through the thickeſt clouds. </
s
>
<
s
>But
<
lb
/>
as to the obſcurity, I believe not that the Moon is wholly
<
lb
/>
ved of light, as the Earth; nay, that clarity which is ſeen in the
<
lb
/>
remainder of its
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Diſcus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
over and above the ſmall creſcent
<
lb
/>
lightened by the Sun, I repute to be its proper and natural light,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg157
"/>
<
lb
/>
and not a reflection of the Earth, which I eſteem unable, by
<
lb
/>
reaſon of its aſperity (craggineſſe) and obſcurity, to reflect the
<
lb
/>
raies of the Sun. </
s
>
<
s
>In the third Parallel I aſſent unto you in one
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg158
"/>
<
lb
/>
part, and diſſent in another: I agree in judging the body of the
<
lb
/>
Moon to be moſt ſolid and hard, like the Earth, yea much more;
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg159
"/>
<
lb
/>
for if from
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
we receive that the Heavens are impenetrable,
<
lb
/>
and the Stars the moſt denſe parts of Heaven, it muſt neceſſarily
<
lb
/>
follow, that they are moſt ſolid and moſt impenetrable.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg157
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The ſecond clarity
<
lb
/>
of the Moon
<
lb
/>
ſteemed to be its
<
lb
/>
native light.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg158
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The Earth unable
<
lb
/>
to reflect the Suns
<
lb
/>
raies.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg159
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
The ſubſtance of
<
lb
/>
the Heavens
<
lb
/>
netrable,
<
lb
/>
ing to
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>What excellent matter would the Heavens afford us for
<
lb
/>
to make Pallaces of, if we could procure a ſubſtance ſo hard and ſo
<
lb
/>
tranſparent?</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>