Galilei, Galileo, The systems of the world, 1661

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
< >
page |< < of 948 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s>
                <pb xlink:href="065/01/062.jpg" pagenum="56"/>
              ſented by figures anſwerable to thoſe which we ſee in the Moon:
                <lb/>
              I comprehend alſo, how the period of its illumination and
                <lb/>
              tion of figure, would be monthly, albeit the Sun revolves round
                <lb/>
              about it in twenty four hours: and laſtly, I do not ſcruple to
                <lb/>
              admit, that the half onely of the Moon ſeeth all the Earth, and
                <lb/>
              that all the Earth ſeeth but onely half of the Moon. </s>
              <s>For what
                <lb/>
              remains, I repute it moſt falſe, that the Moon can receive light
                <lb/>
              from the Earth, which is moſt obſcure, opacous, and utterly
                <lb/>
              apt to reflect the Suns light, as the Moon doth reflect it to us: and
                <lb/>
              as I have ſaid, I hold that that light which we ſee in the
                <lb/>
              der of the Moons face (the ſplendid creſcents ſubducted) by the
                <lb/>
              illumination, is the proper and natural light of the Moon, and no
                <lb/>
              eaſie matter would induce me to believe otherwiſe. </s>
              <s>The ſeventh,
                <lb/>
              touching the mutual Eclipſes, may be alſo admitted; howbeit
                <lb/>
              that is wont to be called the eclipſe of the Sun, which you are
                <lb/>
              pleaſed to phraſe the eclipſe of the Earth. </s>
              <s>And this is what
                <emph type="italics"/>
              I
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              have at this time to ſay in oppoſition to your ſeven congruities
                <lb/>
              or reſemblances, to which objections, if you are minded to make
                <lb/>
              any reply,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              I
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ſhall willingly hear you.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="margin">
              <s>
                <margin.target id="marg161"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              The ſuperficies of
                <lb/>
              the Moon more
                <lb/>
              ſleek than any
                <lb/>
              Looking-glaß.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p type="margin">
              <s>
                <margin.target id="marg162"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              The eminencies
                <lb/>
              and cavities in the
                <lb/>
              Moon are illuſions
                <lb/>
              of its opacous and
                <lb/>
              perspicuous parts.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV. </s>
              <s>If I have well apprehended what you have anſwered, it
                <lb/>
              ſeems to me, that there ſtill remains in controverſie between us,
                <lb/>
              tain conditions, which I made common betwixt the Moon & Earth,
                <lb/>
              and they are theſe; You eſteem the Moon to be ſmooth and poliſht,
                <lb/>
              as a Looking-glaſs, and as ſuch, able to reflect the Suns light; and
                <lb/>
              contrarily, the Earth, by reaſon of its montuoſity, unable to make
                <lb/>
              ſuch reflection: You yield the Moon to be ſolid and hard, and that
                <lb/>
              you argue from its being ſmooth and polite, and not from its being
                <lb/>
              montuous; and for its appearing montuous, you aſſign as the
                <lb/>
              cauſe, that it conſiſts of parts more and leſs opacous and
                <lb/>
              cuous. </s>
              <s>And laſtly, you eſteem that ſecondary light, to be proper
                <lb/>
              to the
                <emph type="italics"/>
              M
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              oon, and not reflected from the Earth; howbeit you
                <lb/>
              ſeem not to deny the ſea, as being of a ſmooth ſurface, ſome
                <lb/>
              kind of reflection. </s>
              <s>As to the convincing you of that error, that
                <lb/>
              the reflection of the
                <emph type="italics"/>
              M
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              oon is made, as it were, like that of a
                <lb/>
              Looking-glaſs,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              I
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              have ſmall hope, whilſt
                <emph type="italics"/>
              I
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ſee, that what hath
                <lb/>
                <arrow.to.target n="marg163"/>
                <lb/>
              been read in the ^{*}
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Saggiator
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              and in the
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Solar Letters
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              of our
                <emph type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              mon Friend,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              hath profited nothing in your judgment, if haply
                <lb/>
              you have attentively read what he hath there written on this
                <lb/>
              ject.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="margin">
              <s>
                <margin.target id="marg163"/>
              *
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Il Saggiatore, &
                <lb/>
              Lettere Solari,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
                <lb/>
              two Treatiſes of
                <lb/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Galilæus.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SIMPL.
                <emph type="italics"/>
              I
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              have peruſed the ſame ſo ſuperficially, according to
                <lb/>
              the ſmall time of leaſure allowed me from more ſolid ſtudies;
                <lb/>
              therefore, if you think you can, either by repeating ſome of thoſe
                <lb/>
              reaſons, or by alledging others, reſolve me theſe doubts,
                <emph type="italics"/>
              I
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              will
                <lb/>
              hearken to them attentively.</s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s>SALV.
                <emph type="italics"/>
              I
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              will tell you what comes into my mind upon the </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>