It comprises ten chapters in 168 folios demi-octavo.
Other Italian editions of which
we find some record are the second at Venice, 1552; third, Venice, 1558; fourth, Venice,
1559: fifth, Bologna, 1678. A French translation, by Jacques Vincent, was published in
Paris, 1556, and this translation was again published at Rouen in 1627. Of the ten chapters the
last six are almost wholly devoted to metal working and founding, and it is more largely for
this description of the methods of making artillery, munitinons of war and bells that the book
is celebrated. In any event, with the exception of a quotation which we give on page 297 on
silver amalgamation, there is little of interest on our subject in the latter chapters. The
first four chapters are undoubtedly of importance in the history of metallurgical literature,
and represent the first work on smelting. The descriptions are, however, very diffuse, difficult
to follow, and lack arrangement and detail. But like the Probierbüchlein, the fact that it was
written prior to De Re Metallica demands attention for it which it would not otherwise receive.
The ores of gold, silver, copper, lead, tin, and iron are described, but much interrupted with
denunciations of the alchemists. There is little of geological or mineralogical interest, he too
holding to a muddle of the classic elements astrology and alchemy. He has nothing of con
sequence to say on mining, and dismisses concentration with a few words. Upon assaying
his work is not so useful as the Probierbüchlein. On ore smelting he describes the reduction
of iron and lead ores and cupriferous silver or gold ores with lead. He gives the barest
description of a blast furnace, but adds an interesting account of a reverbero furnace. He
describes liquation as consisting of one operation; the subsequent treatment of the copper
by refining with an oxidising blast, but does not mention poling; the cupellation of argen
tiferous lead and the reduction of the litharge; the manufacture of nitric acid and that
method of parting gold and silver. He also gives the method of parting with antimony and
sulphur, and by cementation with common salt. Among the side issues, he describes the
method of making brass with calamine; of making steel; of distilling quicksilver; of melting
out sulphur; of making vitriol and alum. He states that arsenico and orpimento and etrisa
gallio (realgar) are the same substance, and are used to colour copper white.
we find some record are the second at Venice, 1552; third, Venice, 1558; fourth, Venice,
1559: fifth, Bologna, 1678. A French translation, by Jacques Vincent, was published in
Paris, 1556, and this translation was again published at Rouen in 1627. Of the ten chapters the
last six are almost wholly devoted to metal working and founding, and it is more largely for
this description of the methods of making artillery, munitinons of war and bells that the book
is celebrated. In any event, with the exception of a quotation which we give on page 297 on
silver amalgamation, there is little of interest on our subject in the latter chapters. The
first four chapters are undoubtedly of importance in the history of metallurgical literature,
and represent the first work on smelting. The descriptions are, however, very diffuse, difficult
to follow, and lack arrangement and detail. But like the Probierbüchlein, the fact that it was
written prior to De Re Metallica demands attention for it which it would not otherwise receive.
The ores of gold, silver, copper, lead, tin, and iron are described, but much interrupted with
denunciations of the alchemists. There is little of geological or mineralogical interest, he too
holding to a muddle of the classic elements astrology and alchemy. He has nothing of con
sequence to say on mining, and dismisses concentration with a few words. Upon assaying
his work is not so useful as the Probierbüchlein. On ore smelting he describes the reduction
of iron and lead ores and cupriferous silver or gold ores with lead. He gives the barest
description of a blast furnace, but adds an interesting account of a reverbero furnace. He
describes liquation as consisting of one operation; the subsequent treatment of the copper
by refining with an oxidising blast, but does not mention poling; the cupellation of argen
tiferous lead and the reduction of the litharge; the manufacture of nitric acid and that
method of parting gold and silver. He also gives the method of parting with antimony and
sulphur, and by cementation with common salt. Among the side issues, he describes the
method of making brass with calamine; of making steel; of distilling quicksilver; of melting
out sulphur; of making vitriol and alum. He states that arsenico and orpimento and etrisa
gallio (realgar) are the same substance, and are used to colour copper white.
In general, Biringuccio should be accredited with the first description (as
far as we
are aware) of silver amalgamation, of a reverberatory furnace, and of liquation, although the
description is not complete. Also he is, so far as we are aware, the first to mention cobalt
blue (Zaffre) and manganese, although he classed them as “half” metals. His descriptions
are far inferior to Agricola's; they do not compass anything like the same range of metal
lurgy, and betray the lack of a logical mind.
are aware) of silver amalgamation, of a reverberatory furnace, and of liquation, although the
description is not complete. Also he is, so far as we are aware, the first to mention cobalt
blue (Zaffre) and manganese, although he classed them as “half” metals. His descriptions
are far inferior to Agricola's; they do not compass anything like the same range of metal
lurgy, and betray the lack of a logical mind.
Other works.
There are several works devoted to mineralogy, dating from the fifteenth
and early sixteenth centuries, which were, no doubt, available to Agricola in the compilation of
his De Natura Fossilium. They are, however, practically all compiled from the jeweller's point
of view rather than from that of the miner. Among them we may mention the poem on
precious stones by Marbodaeus, an author who lived from 1035 to 1123, but which was first
printed at Vienna in 1511; Speculum Lapidum, a work on precious stones, by Camilli Leonardi,
first printed in Venice in 1502. A work of wider interest to mineralogists is that by Christoph
Entzelt (or Enzelius, Encelio, Encelius, as it is variously given), entitled De Re Metallica,
and first printed in 1551. The work is five years later than De Natura Fossilium, but contains
much new material and was available to Agricola prior to his revised editions.
and early sixteenth centuries, which were, no doubt, available to Agricola in the compilation of
his De Natura Fossilium. They are, however, practically all compiled from the jeweller's point
of view rather than from that of the miner. Among them we may mention the poem on
precious stones by Marbodaeus, an author who lived from 1035 to 1123, but which was first
printed at Vienna in 1511; Speculum Lapidum, a work on precious stones, by Camilli Leonardi,
first printed in Venice in 1502. A work of wider interest to mineralogists is that by Christoph
Entzelt (or Enzelius, Encelio, Encelius, as it is variously given), entitled De Re Metallica,
and first printed in 1551. The work is five years later than De Natura Fossilium, but contains
much new material and was available to Agricola prior to his revised editions.