Galilei, Galileo
,
Discourse concerning the natation of bodies
,
1663
Text
Text Image
XML
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 77
>
Scan
Original
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 77
>
page
|<
<
of 77
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
pagenum
="
472
"/>
or theſe others, a ſimple negation, or privation, ſuch as Vacuity
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1542
"/>
<
lb
/>
would be in reference to Repletion, argueth againſt
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Democritus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
and
<
lb
/>
ſaith: If it be true, as you ſuppoſe, then there ſhall be a great Maſs
<
lb
/>
of water, which ſhall have more of Fire, than a ſmall Maſs of Air,
<
lb
/>
and a great Maſs of Air, which ſhall have more of Earth than a
<
lb
/>
tle Maſs of water, whereby it would enſue, that a great Maſs of Air,
<
lb
/>
ſhould come more ſwiftly downwards, than a little quantity of
<
lb
/>
water: But that is never in any caſe ſoever: Therefore
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Democritus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
diſcourſeth erroneouſly.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1540
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſhews
<
lb
/>
his deſire of
<
lb
/>
finding
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
critus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in an
<
lb
/>
ror, to exceed
<
lb
/>
that of
<
lb
/>
veting Truth.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1541
"/>
Cap. 5. Text 41.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg1542
"/>
Id. </
s
>
<
s
>ibid.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>But in my opinion, the Doctrine of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Democritus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is not by this
<
lb
/>
gation overthrown, but if I erre not, the manner of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
deduction
<
lb
/>
either concludes not, or if it do conclude any thing, it may with
<
lb
/>
quall force be reſtored againſt himſelf.
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Democritus
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
will grant to
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that there may be a great Maſs of Air taken, which
<
lb
/>
tains more Earth, than a ſmall quantity of water, but yet will deny,
<
lb
/>
that ſuch a Maſs of Air, ſhall go faſter downwards than a little water,
<
lb
/>
and that for many reaſons. </
s
>
<
s
>Firſt, becauſe if the greater quantity
<
lb
/>
of Earth, contained in the great Maſs of Air, ought to cauſe a greater
<
lb
/>
Velocity than a leſs quantity of Earth, contained in a little quantity
<
lb
/>
of water, it would be neceſſary, firſt, that it were true, that a
<
lb
/>
greater Maſs of pure Earth, ſhould move more ſwiftly than a leſs:
<
lb
/>
But this is falſe, though
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Ariſtotle
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in many places affirms it to be true:
<
lb
/>
becauſe not the greater abſolute, but the greater ſpecificall Gravity,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1543
"/>
<
lb
/>
is the cauſe of greater Velocity: nor doth a Ball of Wood,
<
lb
/>
ing ten pounds, deſcend more ſwiftly than one weighing ten Ounces,
<
lb
/>
and that is of the ſame Matter: but indeed a Bullet of Lead of four
<
lb
/>
Ounces, deſcendeth more ſwiftly than a Ball of Wood of twenty
<
lb
/>
Pounds: becauſe the Lead is more grave
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in ſpecie
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
than the Wood.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>Therefore, its not neceſſary, that a great Maſs of Air, by reaſon of
<
lb
/>
the much Earth contained in it, do deſcend more ſwiftly than a little
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg1544
"/>
<
lb
/>
Maſs of water, but on the contrary, any whatſoever Maſs of water,
<
lb
/>
ſhall move more ſwiftly than any other of Air, by reaſon the
<
lb
/>
pation of the terrene parts
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
in ſpecie
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is greater in the water, than in the
<
lb
/>
Air. </
s
>
<
s
>Let us note, in the ſecond place, how that in multiplying the
<
lb
/>
Maſs of the Air, we not only multiply that which is therein of terrene,
<
lb
/>
but its Fire alſo: whence the Cauſe of aſcending, no leſs encreaſeth,
<
lb
/>
by vertue of the Fire, than that of deſcending on the account of its
<
lb
/>
multiplied Earth. </
s
>
<
s
>It was requiſite in increaſing the greatneſs of the
<
lb
/>
Air, to multiply that which it hath of terrene only, leaving its Fire
<
lb
/>
in its firſt ſtate, for then the terrene parts of the augmented Air,
<
lb
/>
overcoming the terrene parts of the ſmall quantity of water, it might
<
lb
/>
with more probability have been pretended, that the great
<
lb
/>
ty of Air, ought to deſcend with a greater
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Impetus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
than the little
<
lb
/>
quantity of water.</
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>