Monantheuil, Henri de, Aristotelis Mechanica, 1599

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 21]
[Figure 22]
[Figure 23]
[Figure 24]
[Figure 25]
[Figure 26]
[Figure 27]
[Figure 28]
[Figure 29]
[Figure 30]
[Figure 31]
[Figure 32]
[Figure 33]
[Figure 34]
[Figure 35]
[Figure 36]
[Figure 37]
[Figure 38]
[Figure 39]
[Figure 40]
[Figure 41]
[Figure 42]
[Figure 43]
[Figure 44]
[Figure 45]
[Figure 46]
[Figure 47]
[Figure 48]
[Figure 49]
[Figure 50]
< >
page |< < of 252 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <subchap1>
              <pb xlink:href="035/01/072.jpg" pagenum="32"/>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="id.000627">Si vero mobilis.]
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                Concluſio eſt confirmata reiterato propoſi­
                  <lb/>
                tionis præcedentis proſyllogiſmo, ſic. </s>
                <s id="id.000628">Si duæ lationes puncti mobilis
                  <lb/>
                ſunt in nulla ratione, nulloque in tempore, impoßibile eſt mobile hoc
                  <lb/>
                latum eſſe ſecundum rectam: atqui puncti deſcribentis circulum duæ
                  <lb/>
                lationes ſunt in nulla ratione, nullóque in tempore. </s>
                <s id="id.000629">Ergo impoßibile
                  <lb/>
                eſt punctum, quod deſcribit circulum, ferri ſecundum rectam. </s>
                <s id="id.000630">Sint
                  <lb/>
                enim lationes illæ in aliqua ratione. </s>
                <s id="id.000631">Ergo punctum feretur ſecun­
                  <lb/>
                dum rectam: at non fertur ſecundum rectam. </s>
                <s id="id.000632">Peripheria enim non
                  <lb/>
                eſt recta: ſed curua. </s>
                <s id="id.000633">Non igitur in aliqua ratione ſunt illius lationes.
                  <lb/>
                </s>
                <s id="id.000634">Et ſi non in vlla ratione. </s>
                <s id="id.000635">nec igitur in tempore, quia tempora moti­
                  <lb/>
                bus analoga ſunt. </s>
                <s id="id.000636">Hîc duo occurrunt valde difficilia. </s>
                <s id="id.000637">Prius de
                  <lb/>
                tempore. </s>
                <s id="id.000638">Demonſtrauit enim Ariſtoteles in Phyſicis, omnem mo­
                  <lb/>
                tum eſſe in tempore: alterum, cum ambæ lationes ſint in eodem ge­
                  <lb/>
                nere motus, ſcilicet localis, quî fiet, vt rationem non habeant. </s>
                <s id="id.000639">Hoc
                  <lb/>
                enim repugnat def. 3. lib. 5. elem. </s>
                <s id="id.000641">quantitas enim motus vnius mul­
                  <lb/>
                tiplicata, alterius vicißim quantitatem ſuperare poteſt. </s>
                <s id="id.000642">Dicimus
                  <lb/>
                ergo quod ad hoc poſterius attinet, rationem illas habere: ſed
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                  <foreign lang="el">a)/r)r(hton,</foreign>
                  <lb/>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                & non ſolum indicibilem, quod numeris exprimi nequeat: ſed &
                  <lb/>
                quod rectis lineis geometricè id eſt exactè, exprimi non poßit, qualis
                  <lb/>
                non eſt inter duas lationes è quibus recta creatur, cum hæc ſi nume­
                  <lb/>
                ris non poßit exprimi, at rectis lineis ſaltem geometricè exprimitur.
                  <lb/>
                </s>
                <s id="id.000643">vt cum duarum rectarum, quæ parallelogrammum conſtituunt, vna
                  <lb/>
                eſt latus quadrati alicuius, altera eſt eius diameter. </s>
                <s id="id.000644">Tunc enim ratio
                  <lb/>
                eſt rectis illis licet incommenſerabilibus prop. 116. lib. 10. expreſſa.
                  <lb/>
                </s>
                <s id="id.000645">At hîc vt inter peripheriam & diametrum ſit aliqua ratio, veluti
                  <lb/>
                inter arcum & ſubtendentem: hæc tamen neque numeris exprimi
                  <lb/>
                poteſt, nec rectis lineis Geometrice vt videre eſt ex Archimede
                  <lb/>
                lib.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                  <foreign lang="el">peri\ metrh/s. kuk,</foreign>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                & Ptol. lib. 1.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                  <foreign lang="el">me/gal. sunt. </foreign>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                quod autem ad
                  <lb/>
                prius attinet in lationibus illis tempus admittitur, ſed hoc eſt eiuſmo­
                  <lb/>
                di, vt nullum eius detur inſtans, quo vna latio fiat, quo etiam non
                  <lb/>
                & altera itidem fiat: quod prioribus licet commune eſſe poßit: pro­
                  <lb/>
                pter tamen laterum inæqualitatem vbi in æqualia dantur, non ita
                  <lb/>
                ſimplex & indiuiſibile eſt. </s>
                <s id="id.000648">Cæterum duas has motiones facile ani­
                  <lb/>
                mo concipiet, qui viderit pueros noſtrates ſub medio vere, quo genus
                  <lb/>
                hoc inſecti in roſarijs noſtris abundat, captam vnam grandiorem
                  <lb/>
                muſcam viridem Cathelinam ipſi vocant, pede adfuniculum alliga­
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>