Guevara, Giovanni di, In Aristotelis mechanicas commentarii, 1627

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 1]
Page: 1
[Figure 2]
Page: 8
[Figure 3]
Page: 11
[Figure 4]
Page: 46
[Figure 5]
Page: 51
[Figure 6]
Page: 52
[Figure 7]
Page: 53
[Figure 8]
Page: 55
[Figure 9]
Page: 59
[Figure 10]
Page: 64
[Figure 11]
Page: 65
[Figure 12]
Page: 66
[Figure 13]
Page: 67
[Figure 14]
Page: 68
[Figure 15]
Page: 69
[Figure 16]
Page: 70
[Figure 17]
Page: 70
[Figure 18]
Page: 71
[Figure 19]
Page: 71
[Figure 20]
Page: 73
[Figure 21]
Page: 74
[Figure 22]
Page: 80
[Figure 23]
Page: 83
[Figure 24]
Page: 87
[Figure 25]
Page: 88
[Figure 26]
Page: 88
[Figure 27]
Page: 91
[Figure 28]
Page: 92
[Figure 29]
Page: 94
[Figure 30]
Page: 95
< >
page |< < of 303 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap id="N10019">
            <p id="N11FF5" type="main">
              <s id="N12034">
                <pb pagenum="66" xlink:href="005/01/074.jpg"/>
              ſuſpenſum, aut etiam latum à principio conſtitueretur. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1203C" type="main">
              <s id="N1203E">Quod ſi contra definitionem, ſeu deſcriptionem tradi­
                <lb/>
              tam afferatur, multa dari poſſe corpora talis figuræ, vt cen­
                <lb/>
              trum grauitatis illorum non ſit intra, ſed extra, quemadmo­
                <lb/>
              dum exempli gratia in rota AB cuius quidem centrum
                <lb/>
              eſſet in C. </s>
              <s id="N1204A">Sicut etiam in corpore irregulari DE cuius
                <lb/>
                <figure id="id.005.01.074.1.jpg" xlink:href="005/01/074/1.jpg" number="21"/>
                <lb/>
              centrum eſſet in F. </s>
              <s id="N12056">Occurrit Guidus Vbaldus dicens, etiam
                <lb/>
              prædicta centra intra figuram eſſe quatenus verè continen­
                <lb/>
              tur ab ambitu eiuſdem figuræ ipſorum corporum. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1205D" type="main">
              <s id="N1205F">His autem ſic ſtabilitis de centro grauitatis, dicendum
                <lb/>
              eſt naturalem mobilitatem grauium, & leuium reſpectiuè
                <lb/>
              (hoc eſt corporum magis, aut minus grauium, vt explicui­
                <lb/>
              mus) eſſe innatam quandam aptitudinem, ac propenſionem
                <lb/>
              ad motum deorſum ex principio intrinſeco tum actiuo, tum
                <lb/>
              paſſiuo per rectam lineam, quæ centrum grauitatis ipſius
                <lb/>
              grauis,
                <expan abbr="centrumq.">centrumque</expan>
              mundi connectit. </s>
              <s id="N12072">Id quod apertiſſimè
                <lb/>
              conſtabit conſideranti graue quodcumque ſecluſo omni
                <lb/>
              impedimento, ac detentione, ſtatim ſuo pondere, & ex ſe
                <lb/>
              centrum vniuerſi expetere, nec vnquam quieſcere donec
                <lb/>
              ad illud ſi fieri poſſet, perueniat. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1207D" type="main">
              <s id="N1207F">Diximus autem huiuſcemodi aptitudinem eſſe ex prin­
                <lb/>
              cipio intrinſeco tum actiuo tum paſſiuo; nam id per quod
                <lb/>
              grauia formaliter conſtituuntur apta, & in actu primo ad
                <lb/>
              motum localem deorſum, non modò eſt potentia paſſiua
                <lb/>
              ipſis innata, ſicut cuilibet corpori ad recipiendum talem
                <lb/>
              motum, ſiue producatur à ſe ipſo ſiue ab alio: ſed præcipuè </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum