Borro, Girolamo, De motu gravium et levium, 1575

Page concordance

< >
< >
page |< < of 316 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <subchap1>
              <p type="main">
                <s id="s.000409">
                  <pb pagenum="54" xlink:href="011/01/074.jpg"/>
                  <emph type="italics"/>
                tis cauſas agentes eſſe crediderit: eam ob rem in fallaciam in
                  <lb/>
                cidit, quæ secundum quid ad ſimpliciter nuncupatur, dum
                  <lb/>
                cauſas secundum quid eo honore affecit, quo ſimpliciter, &
                  <lb/>
                abſolutæ cauſæ affici debuerant: hæc ad argumenti
                  <expan abbr="materiã">materiam</expan>
                .
                  <lb/>
                </s>
                <s id="s.000410">Nunc ad eiuſdem argumenti formam est tertio loco reſpon­
                  <lb/>
                dendum. </s>
                <s id="s.000411">Dixerat Themistius, contrariorum effectuum,
                  <lb/>
                vna & eadem numero cauſa eſſe non potest: sed
                  <expan abbr="cõtrariæ">contrariæ</expan>
                ne­
                  <lb/>
                ceſſe est vt ſint contrariorum effectuum cauſæ: cui reſpon­
                  <lb/>
                dendum eſt; ſi eadem causa ſit eodem modo diſpoſita, id est
                  <lb/>
                vero verius quod Ariſtotelem scripſiſſe libro quarto Metheo
                  <lb/>
                rologicorum paullo ante memorauimus: sed ſi dixerimus
                  <expan abbr="vnã">vnam</expan>
                  <lb/>
                hanc, atque eamdem causam non eſſe eodem modo diſpoſi­
                  <lb/>
                tam, sed modis contrariis: tunc ex eadem causa numero
                  <lb/>
                contrario modo diſpoſita, contrarij effectus naſcuntur: vt
                  <lb/>
                Aristotelem libro secundo Phyſicorum literis conſignauiſſe
                  <lb/>
                nunc diximus. </s>
                <s id="s.000412">maior ergo propoſitio Themistij per inficia­
                  <lb/>
                tionem, vt falſa diluitur, ſi abſolutè proferatur: ſi ei­
                  <lb/>
                dem numero cauſæ diſpoſitiones contrariæ additæ fuerint,
                  <lb/>
                vt vera datur, qua ratione argumentum tollitur; Nec ſequi­
                  <lb/>
                tur, graue in medio collocatum ſtat in medio: ergo ab hoc,
                  <lb/>
                quod eſt eſſe in medio, graue habet, vt quieſcat in medio; perin
                  <lb/>
                de ac non ſequitur, graue extra medium poſitum ad medium
                  <lb/>
                fertur: ergo ab hoc, quod eſt eſſe extra medium, graue habet
                  <lb/>
                vt moueatur ad medium: Vera ergo est ſecunda hypotheſis,
                  <lb/>
                quam vti veram poſuimus: & quæ à Themiſtio contra eam­
                  <lb/>
                dem dicuntur, nullum momentum habent.
                  <emph.end type="italics"/>
                </s>
              </p>
            </subchap1>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>