Fabri, Honoré, Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur, 1665

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
< >
page |< < of 248 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <pb pagenum="70" xlink:href="025/01/074.jpg"/>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000788">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Chryſocom.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000789"> Sed, quæſo te, Antime, quandoquidem alia non ſup­
                <lb/>
              petunt argumenta in terreſtri globo, ad confutandum illius motum pro­
                <lb/>
              fer amabo, locos illos ex quibus alia erui poſſint. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000790">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000791"> Nullus globus terreſtri vicinior eſt, quàm Luna; in Lunari
                <lb/>
              globo nonnihil habeo, quod fortè non minùs negotij tibi faceſſet, Augu­
                <lb/>
              ſtine, quàm Marinus æſtus. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000792">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Auguſtin.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000793"> Immò in Iove mobili, circa quem moventur quatuor
                <lb/>
              Ioviales Lunæ, clariſſimam analogiam habemus terræ mobilis, circa
                <lb/>
              quam Luna volvitur; nonnihil ſimile in Saturno habemus, circa quem
                <lb/>
              etiam ſua Stella, ſeu Luna Saturnia circumfertur; Luna igitur noſtræ
                <lb/>
              hypotheſi non obeſt, immò noſtra hypotheſis Lunari ſyſtemati favet,
                <lb/>
              quod ſcilicet, & à deformibus ſpiris, & à motu raptus versùs Occaſum
                <lb/>
              liberat. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000794">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000795"> Negari non poteſt, quin ex ipſiſſimis, non illorum modò,
                <lb/>
              qui communem Aſtronomorum ſententiam tenent, verùm etiam prin­
                <lb/>
              cipium Copernicanæ ſententiæ defenſorum principiit, Planetarum mo­
                <lb/>
              tus reales, vt vocant, æquales ſint, quamvis inæquales nobis appa­
                <lb/>
              reant; hanc realium motuum inæqualitatem Antiqui omnes, ad vnum,
                <lb/>
              vt Aſtronomiæ peſtem ac mortem relegarunt; ex recentioribus verò
                <lb/>
              Copernicus veſter, illam humano intellectui horrori eſſe dixit, Cla­
                <lb/>
              vius ſummæ dementiæ; Reinholdus imperitæ imaginationis; alij deni­
                <lb/>
              que, vt Tycho, æqualem motum, in cœleſtibus Sphæris, pro certo
                <lb/>
              & indubitato axiomate poſuerunt: Scio, Keplerum, quem deinde pauci
                <lb/>
              alij ſecuti ſunt, inæqualitatem motuum realium adſtruxiſſe, in id dum­
                <lb/>
              taxat ab ipſa deſperatione inductum extremiſque anguſtiis, in quas illum
                <lb/>
              multa phænomena redegerant, quæ ſcilicet ſuppoſitis motibus realibus in
                <lb/>
              ſua hypotheſi explicare non poterat; hæc vnica huius conſilij cauſa fuit,
                <lb/>
              quod certè penitus ruit, ſi poſitis motibus æqualibus, cuncta phænomena
                <lb/>
              explicari poſſunt. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000796">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Auguſtin.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000797"> In hac parte tecum facilè ſentio, & verò à Ptolemæo
                <lb/>
              aliiſque antiquis Aſtronomis, itemque à Tychone, Longomontano,
                <lb/>
              Copernico, Galileo, Lansbergio, Clavio, Magino, aliiſque rei Aſtro­
                <lb/>
              nomicæ Principibus, in hoc diſcedere, vix auſim ; nec ratio deeſt, quæ
                <lb/>
              meo ſaltem iudicio, rem conficit; nempe omnis motus per ſe inæquabi­
                <lb/>
              lis vel acceleratus, vel retardatus eſt, neutrum de cœleſtibus motibus
                <lb/>
              dici poteſt; cùm enim eadem ſemper eſſet accelerationis vel retardatio­
                <lb/>
              nis cauſa, certè in infinitum acceleraretur, vel retardaretur; quod vel
                <lb/>
              abſurdum dictu eſt; omitto certiſſimam totius Aſtronomiæ ruinam
                <lb/>
              ac deſtructionem, cùm inæqualitas certis ac perpetuis regulis minimè
                <lb/>
              ſubjaceat; incerta ſcilicet, varia, ignota; cùm enim vna dumtaxat
                <lb/>
              fit æqualitas, infinitæ ſunt ac variæ inæqualitates; cur hæc potiùs quam
                <lb/>
              illa? </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000798">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Chryſocom.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000799"> Multas tamen apud Autorem Neotericum de re Aſtro­
                <lb/>
              nomica optimè meritum, rationes legi, quibus probare conatur, inæ­
                <lb/>
              qualitatem realium motuum, quantum porrò conjicio, in ſingula-</s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum