Gassendi, Pierre, De motu impresso a motore translato epistulae duae, 1642

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
< >
page |< < of 158 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="id.000566">
                <pb pagenum="68" xlink:href="027/01/075.jpg"/>
              motum fieri velociorem; impelle tertio, adhûc ve­
                <lb/>
              lociorem; impelle quarto, adhûc magis; atque ita
                <lb/>
              porrô; adeò vt clarum eſſe videatur, velocitatem
                <lb/>
              motus non aliunde increſcere, quàm ex eo, quòd mo­
                <lb/>
              bile dum in motu eſt, de nouo mouetur, ſeu nouum
                <lb/>
              impulſum accipit à cauſa externa. </s>
              <s id="id.000567">Neque verò, cùm
                <lb/>
              impulſum dico, attractum non intelligo: quippe
                <lb/>
              cùm attrahere nihil aliud ſit, quàm recuruato inſtru­
                <lb/>
              mento verſum ſe impellere; & perſpicuum ſit lapi­
                <lb/>
              dem, globumve memoratum tam impelli vno, plu­
                <lb/>
              ribuſve ictibus poſſe, ſi quis ipſum antecedendo cur­
                <lb/>
              uis digitis adigat, quàm ſi ſubſequendo deuexis
                <lb/>
              propellat. </s>
              <s id="id.000568">Tertiò, cùm de motus deorſùm accele­
                <lb/>
              ratione agatur, conſtat iam, ſiue aër ſolus ſupernè
                <lb/>
              impellat, ſiue Terra ſola infernè accerſat, ſiue aër,
                <lb/>
              & Terra ſimùl vireis conferant, non eſſe ſatis, vt la­
                <lb/>
              pidi vnicus initio ictus imprimatur; ſed eſſe neceſſa­
                <lb/>
              rium, vt noui, nouique imprimantur continuò; alio­
                <lb/>
              quin enim lapis non acceleraret gradum, ſed ferre­
                <lb/>
              tur motu vt æquabili, ita imperceptibili; ſegniſſimo
                <lb/>
              videlicet, propter tenuïtatem ſimplicis conatus,
                <lb/>
              ſeu vnici ictus penè nullam vim. </s>
              <s id="id.000569">Cùm verò ſeu ſola
                <lb/>
              impulſio, ſeu ſola attractio ad accelerationem ſuffi­
                <lb/>
              ciat; quid-nam cauſæ eſſe putabis, cur cenſeam
                <lb/>
              vtramque eſſe coniungendam? </s>
              <s id="id.000570">Nempe in cauſa pro­
                <lb/>
              portio eſt, qua dictum eſt antè accelerationem fieri,
                <lb/>
              Nam fac vnicam eſſe cauſam, exempli gratiâ attra­
                <lb/>
              ctionem; concipies quidem ex dictis ſequi, vt quia
                <lb/>
              radij magnetici, quaſi ſtringentes chordulæ, con­
                <lb/>
              tinentem motum, ſiue impetum lapidi imprimunt, </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum