Salusbury, Thomas
,
Mathematical collections and translations (Tome I)
,
1667
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Table of figures
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 331
[out of range]
>
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 331
[out of range]
>
page
|<
<
of 701
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
040/01/807.jpg
"
pagenum
="
115
"/>
away a pretty big part towards the end with a notable alleviation
<
lb
/>
of the weight; which in Beams of great Rooms would be commo
<
lb
/>
dious, and of no ſmall proſit. </
s
>
<
s
>And it would be pretty, to find what
<
lb
/>
Figure that Solid ought to have, that it might have equal Reſi
<
lb
/>
ſtance in all its parts; ſo as that it were not with more eaſe to be
<
lb
/>
broken by a weight that ſhould preſſe it in the midſt, than in any
<
lb
/>
other place.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. </
s
>
<
s
>I was juſt about to tell you a thing very notable and
<
lb
/>
pleaſant to this purpoſe. </
s
>
<
s
>I will aſſume a brief Scheme for the bet
<
lb
/>
ter explanation of my meaning. </
s
>
<
s
>This Figure D B is a Priſm, whoſe
<
lb
/>
Reſiſtance againſt Fraction in the term A D by a Force preſſing
<
lb
/>
at the term B, is leſſe than the Reſiſtance that would be found in
<
lb
/>
the place C I, by how much the length C B is leſſer than B A; as
<
lb
/>
hath already been demon
<
lb
/>
ſtrated. </
s
>
<
s
>Now ſuppoſe the
<
lb
/>
<
figure
id
="
id.040.01.807.1.jpg
"
xlink:href
="
040/01/807/1.jpg
"
number
="
68
"/>
<
lb
/>
ſaid Priſme to be ſawed
<
lb
/>
Diagonally according to the
<
lb
/>
Line FB, ſo that the oppo
<
lb
/>
ſite Surfaces may be two
<
lb
/>
Triangles, one of which to
<
lb
/>
wards us is F A B. </
s
>
<
s
>This So
<
lb
/>
lid obtains a quality contrary to the Priſme, to wit, that it leſſe re
<
lb
/>
ſiſteth Fraction by the Force placed in B at the term C than at A,
<
lb
/>
by as much the Length C
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is leſſe than
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
A; Which we will ea
<
lb
/>
ſily prove: For imagining the Section C N O parallel to the other
<
lb
/>
A F D, the Line
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
F
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
A ſhall be to C N in the Triangle F A
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in the
<
lb
/>
ſame proportion, as the Line A
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is to
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
C: and therefore if we
<
lb
/>
ſuppoſe the Fulciment of the two Leavers to be in the Points A
<
lb
/>
and C, whoſe Diſtances are
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
A, A F,
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
C, and C N, theſe, I ſay,
<
lb
/>
ſhall be like: and therefore that Moment which the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
F
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
orce placed
<
lb
/>
at
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
hath at the Diſtance
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
A above the Reſiſtance placed at the
<
lb
/>
Diſtance A
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
F
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
, the ſaid
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
F
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
orce at
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ſhall have at the Diſtance
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
C
<
lb
/>
above the ſame Reſiſtance, were it placed at the Diſtance C N:
<
lb
/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ut the Reſiſtance to be overcome at the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
F
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ulciment C, being pla
<
lb
/>
ced at the Diſtance C N, from the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
F
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
orce in
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is leſſer than the
<
lb
/>
Reſiſtance in A ſo much as the Rectangle C O is leſſe than the
<
lb
/>
Rectangle A D; that is, ſo much as the Line C N is leſs than A
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
F
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
;
<
lb
/>
that is, C
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
B
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
than B A: Therefore the Reſiſtance of the part O C B
<
lb
/>
againſt
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
F
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
raction in C is ſo much leſs than the Reſiſtance of the
<
lb
/>
whole D A O againſt
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
F
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
racture in O, as the Length C B is leſs than
<
lb
/>
A B. </
s
>
<
s
>We have therefore from the Beam or Priſme D B, taken
<
lb
/>
away a part, that is half, cutting it Diagonally, and left the Wedge
<
lb
/>
or triangular Priſm
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
F
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
B A; and they are two Solids of contrary
<
lb
/>
Qualities, namely, that more reſiſts the more it is ſhortned, and this
<
lb
/>
in ſhortning loſeth its toughneſs as faſt. </
s
>
<
s
>Now this being granted, </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>