Schott, Gaspar
,
Mechanica hydraulico-pneumatica. Pars I. Mechanicae Hydraulico-pnevmaticae Theoriam continet.
,
1657
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 203
>
Scan
Original
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 203
>
page
|<
<
of 203
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
051/01/083.jpg
"
pagenum
="
52
"/>
nec poſtremam ipſius manum expertum, vt habetur initio libelli
<
lb
/>
in præfatiuncula ad Lectorem. </
s
>
<
s
>Eſt autem in Commandini te
<
lb
/>
xtu ac ſchemate inſignis error in eo, quòd clavicula R trans
<
lb
/>
mittit aquam quæ eſt in ABEF intra baſim EFCD per aper
<
lb
/>
tum ſolùm foramen ſine tubulo, qui paulò longior ſit quàm tu
<
lb
/>
bulus OX; quod tamen omnino requiritur, vt diximus paulò
<
lb
/>
antè §. IV. & cauſam dabimusintrà Protheoria IV. cap. 2. Pro
<
lb
/>
poſit. 14. experientia ſiquidem conſtat, cylindrum aquæ per fo
<
lb
/>
ramen
<
expan
abbr
="
deſcendentẽ
">deſcendentem</
expan
>
(ſi quandoque deſcendit aëre ſuccedente)
<
lb
/>
in aêre libero non habere eandem vim, ac deſcendentem per
<
lb
/>
tubum; tametſi vtrobique ſit eadem aquæ quantitas, cum eodem
<
lb
/>
perpendiculo. </
s
>
<
s
>Cauſa eſt, quia ſi liberè & ſine tubo defluit a queus
<
lb
/>
cylindrus,
<
expan
abbr
="
ſignũ
">ſignum</
expan
>
eſt aërem ſubintrare; ſi aër ſubintrat, ceſſat me
<
lb
/>
tus vacui, ac proinde aqua debet elevari vt
<
expan
abbr
="
laborãti
">laboranti</
expan
>
Naturæ ſuc
<
lb
/>
currat. </
s
>
<
s
>Quòd ſi tam ſtrictum eſt foramen, vt aër ſubintrare non
<
lb
/>
poſſit, nè gutta quidem aquæ effluet, vt experientia quotidiana
<
lb
/>
docet, idque propter vacui metum. </
s
>
<
s
>Hunc tamen errorem ego
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg112
"/>
<
lb
/>
nequaquam Heroni adſcribendum putem, vt Porta facit, ſed
<
lb
/>
exiſtimo Heronem produxiſſe tubulum R ferè vſque fundum
<
lb
/>
CD; ſic enim major erit quàm tubulus XO, & aqua per ipſam
<
lb
/>
R decideus habebit perpendiculum præponderans perpendi
<
lb
/>
culo aquæ ſeu olei aſcendentis per XO. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg111
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Heronis lo
<
lb
/>
cus apud
<
lb
/>
Comman
<
lb
/>
dinum men
<
lb
/>
doſuæ.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg112
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Heronis er
<
lb
/>
ror excuſa
<
lb
/>
tur.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Similis error reperitur apud Heronem cap. 36. vbi docet
<
lb
/>
ſatyriſcum conſtruere ſuper quadam baſi, vtrem in manibus
<
expan
abbr
="
te-nentẽ
">te
<
lb
/>
nentem</
expan
>
, cui adiacet labellum; vt infuſo in labellum humore, ita
<
lb
/>
vt repleatur, aqua per vtrem in idem labellum in fluat, & non ſu
<
lb
/>
perfundatur, quòusque tota per vtrem aqua evacuata fuerit. </
s
>
<
s
>Ex
<
lb
/>
qua quidem conſtructione deſumpta eſt praxis conſtruendi fon
<
lb
/>
tem Heronis, de quo infrà Parte 2. Claſse I. cap. 2. Machi
<
lb
/>
na 1. 2. & 3. vbi errorem Heronis detegemus;
<
lb
/>
ſi tamen Heronis eſt, & non In
<
lb
/>
terpretis. </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>