Galilei, Galileo
,
The systems of the world
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Page concordance
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
Scan
Original
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 90
91 - 120
121 - 150
151 - 180
181 - 210
211 - 240
241 - 270
271 - 300
301 - 330
331 - 360
361 - 390
391 - 420
421 - 450
451 - 480
481 - 510
511 - 540
541 - 570
571 - 600
601 - 630
631 - 660
661 - 690
691 - 720
721 - 750
751 - 780
781 - 810
811 - 840
841 - 870
871 - 900
901 - 930
931 - 948
>
page
|<
<
of 948
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
065/01/083.jpg
"
pagenum
="
77
"/>
as to have received it for truth; but borrowing it from others, I
<
lb
/>
cannot find any reaſon ſufficient to excuſe him for not perceiving
<
lb
/>
its fallacies; and eſpecially after he had heard the true cauſe of
<
lb
/>
that effect, and had it in his power to ſatisfie himſelf by a thouſand
<
lb
/>
experiments, and manifeſt circumſtances, that the ſame proceeded
<
lb
/>
from the reflection of the Earth, and from nothing elſe: and the more
<
lb
/>
this ſpeculation makes ſomething to be deſired, in the judgment of
<
lb
/>
this Author, and of all thoſe who give no credit to it: ſo much the
<
lb
/>
more doth their not having underſtood and remembred it, excuſe
<
lb
/>
thoſe more receſs Antients, who, I am very certain, did they now
<
lb
/>
underſtand it, would without the leaſt repugnance admit thereof.
<
lb
/>
</
s
>
<
s
>And if I may freely tell you what I think, I cannot believe but
<
lb
/>
that this
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Modern
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
doth in his heart believe it; but I rather think,
<
lb
/>
that the conceit he ſhould not be the firſt Author thereof, did a
<
lb
/>
little move him to endeavour to ſuppreſſe it, or to diſparage it at
<
lb
/>
leaſt amongſt the ſimple, whoſe number we know to be very
<
lb
/>
great; and many there are, who much more affect the
<
lb
/>
rous applauds of the people, than the approbation of a few not
<
lb
/>
vulgar judgments.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SAGR. </
s
>
<
s
>Hold good
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Salviatus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
for me thinks, I ſee that you
<
lb
/>
go not the way to hit the true mark in this your diſcourſe, for theſe
<
lb
/>
that ^{*} confound all propriety, know alſo how to make themſelves
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg196
"/>
<
lb
/>
Authors of others inventions, provided they be not ſo ſtale,
<
lb
/>
and publick in the Schools and Market-places, as that they are more
<
lb
/>
then notorious to every one.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg196
"/>
* Tendono le
<
lb
/>
te al commune.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>SALV. Ha! well aimed, you blame me for roving from the
<
lb
/>
point in hand; but what have you to do with Schools and
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg197
"/>
<
lb
/>
kets? </
s
>
<
s
>Is it not all one whether opinions and inventions be new to
<
lb
/>
men, or the men new to them? </
s
>
<
s
>If you ^{*} contend about the
<
lb
/>
ſteem of the Founders of Sciences, which in all times do ſtart up,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg198
"/>
<
lb
/>
you may make your ſelf their inventor, even to the Alphabet it
<
lb
/>
ſelf, and ſo gain admiration amongſt that illiterate rabble; and
<
lb
/>
though in proceſſe of time your craft ſhould be perceived, that
<
lb
/>
would but little prejudice your deſigne; for that others would
<
lb
/>
ſucceed them in maintaining the number of your fautors; but let
<
lb
/>
us return to prove to
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Simplicius
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
the invalidity of the reaſons of his
<
lb
/>
modern Author, in which there are ſeveral falſities,
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg199
"/>
<
lb
/>
cies, and incredible Paradoxes. </
s
>
<
s
>And firſt, it is falſe that this
<
lb
/>
condary light is clearer about the utmoſt limb than in the middle
<
lb
/>
parts, ſo as to form, as it were, a ring or circle more bright than
<
lb
/>
the reſt of its ſpace or contence. </
s
>
<
s
>True it is, indeed, that looking
<
lb
/>
on the Moon at the time of twilight, at firſt ſight there is the
<
lb
/>
ſemblance of ſuch a circle, but by an illuſion ariſing from the
<
lb
/>
verſity of confines that bound the Moons
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Diſcus,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
which are
<
lb
/>
fuſed by means of this ſecondary light; foraſmuch as on the part </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>