Schott, Gaspar
,
Mechanica hydraulico-pneumatica. Pars I. Mechanicae Hydraulico-pnevmaticae Theoriam continet.
,
1657
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 203
>
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 140
141 - 150
151 - 160
161 - 170
171 - 180
181 - 190
191 - 200
201 - 203
>
page
|<
<
of 203
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
051/01/083.jpg
"
pagenum
="
52
"/>
nec poſtremam ipſius manum expertum, vt habetur initio libelli
<
lb
/>
in præfatiuncula ad Lectorem. </
s
>
<
s
>Eſt autem in Commandini te
<
lb
/>
xtu ac ſchemate inſignis error in eo, quòd clavicula R trans
<
lb
/>
mittit aquam quæ eſt in ABEF intra baſim EFCD per aper
<
lb
/>
tum ſolùm foramen ſine tubulo, qui paulò longior ſit quàm tu
<
lb
/>
bulus OX; quod tamen omnino requiritur, vt diximus paulò
<
lb
/>
antè §. IV. & cauſam dabimusintrà Protheoria IV. cap. 2. Pro
<
lb
/>
poſit. 14. experientia ſiquidem conſtat, cylindrum aquæ per fo
<
lb
/>
ramen
<
expan
abbr
="
deſcendentẽ
">deſcendentem</
expan
>
(ſi quandoque deſcendit aëre ſuccedente)
<
lb
/>
in aêre libero non habere eandem vim, ac deſcendentem per
<
lb
/>
tubum; tametſi vtrobique ſit eadem aquæ quantitas, cum eodem
<
lb
/>
perpendiculo. </
s
>
<
s
>Cauſa eſt, quia ſi liberè & ſine tubo defluit a queus
<
lb
/>
cylindrus,
<
expan
abbr
="
ſignũ
">ſignum</
expan
>
eſt aërem ſubintrare; ſi aër ſubintrat, ceſſat me
<
lb
/>
tus vacui, ac proinde aqua debet elevari vt
<
expan
abbr
="
laborãti
">laboranti</
expan
>
Naturæ ſuc
<
lb
/>
currat. </
s
>
<
s
>Quòd ſi tam ſtrictum eſt foramen, vt aër ſubintrare non
<
lb
/>
poſſit, nè gutta quidem aquæ effluet, vt experientia quotidiana
<
lb
/>
docet, idque propter vacui metum. </
s
>
<
s
>Hunc tamen errorem ego
<
lb
/>
<
arrow.to.target
n
="
marg112
"/>
<
lb
/>
nequaquam Heroni adſcribendum putem, vt Porta facit, ſed
<
lb
/>
exiſtimo Heronem produxiſſe tubulum R ferè vſque fundum
<
lb
/>
CD; ſic enim major erit quàm tubulus XO, & aqua per ipſam
<
lb
/>
R decideus habebit perpendiculum præponderans perpendi
<
lb
/>
culo aquæ ſeu olei aſcendentis per XO. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg111
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Heronis lo
<
lb
/>
cus apud
<
lb
/>
Comman
<
lb
/>
dinum men
<
lb
/>
doſuæ.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
margin
">
<
s
>
<
margin.target
id
="
marg112
"/>
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Heronis er
<
lb
/>
ror excuſa
<
lb
/>
tur.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>Similis error reperitur apud Heronem cap. 36. vbi docet
<
lb
/>
ſatyriſcum conſtruere ſuper quadam baſi, vtrem in manibus
<
expan
abbr
="
te-nentẽ
">te
<
lb
/>
nentem</
expan
>
, cui adiacet labellum; vt infuſo in labellum humore, ita
<
lb
/>
vt repleatur, aqua per vtrem in idem labellum in fluat, & non ſu
<
lb
/>
perfundatur, quòusque tota per vtrem aqua evacuata fuerit. </
s
>
<
s
>Ex
<
lb
/>
qua quidem conſtructione deſumpta eſt praxis conſtruendi fon
<
lb
/>
tem Heronis, de quo infrà Parte 2. Claſse I. cap. 2. Machi
<
lb
/>
na 1. 2. & 3. vbi errorem Heronis detegemus;
<
lb
/>
ſi tamen Heronis eſt, & non In
<
lb
/>
terpretis. </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>