Fabri, Honoré, Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur, 1665

List of thumbnails

< >
81
81
82
82
83
83
84
84
85
85
86
86
87
87
88
88
89
89
90
90
< >
page |< < of 248 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000922">
                <pb pagenum="82" xlink:href="025/01/086.jpg"/>
              ſyſtemati quælibet diametrum apparentium proportio convenire
                <lb/>
              poteſt. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000923">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Auguſtin.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000924"> Habe bis omnes Aſtronomos tibi refragantes, non ſolùm
                <lb/>
              illos, qui Copernico adhærat, verùm etiam omnes propemodùm alios,
                <lb/>
              immo ex tuis non deſunt viri doctiſſimi, & cœleſtium obſervationum
                <lb/>
              peritiſſimi, qui non modò Veneris perigææ dictum quadragecuplo,
                <lb/>
              ſed etiam quinquagecuplo & vltra majorem eſſe, quàm apogææ liberè pro­
                <lb/>
              nunciant. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000925">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000926"> Quid faceres? </s>
              <s id="s.000927">meis oculis fidem detractam non poſſum,
                <lb/>
              optimum teleſcopium adhibui; longè tamen minorem proportionem
                <lb/>
              inæqualitatis eſſe comperi, quanquam ſententiarum diverſitas etiam inter
                <lb/>
              Principes Aſtronomiæ multam mihi hac de re ſuſpicionem injicit, quorum
                <lb/>
              aliqui Veneria perigææ diametrum 7.minut.eſſe volunt, alij 4. alij 3.2.alij
                <lb/>
              demum 1. eadem diverſitas diametrorum apparentium Mercurij, Martis
                <lb/>
              & Iovis apud eoſdem Autores obſervatur. </s>
              <s id="s.000928">Sed, inquiet aliquis, obſer­
                <lb/>
              vationes meæ accuratiores ſunt, idem alius de ſuis ſentiet; Vt vt ſit ad om­
                <lb/>
              nium oculos provoco, nam ſæpè ac ſæpiùs Venerem aſpexi, non procul
                <lb/>
              à perigæo, ſcilicet paulo ante, vel paulò poſt conjunctionem veſpertinam,
                <lb/>
              diverſis etiam modis adhibitis, nunquam tamen illius diſcum quadrage­
                <lb/>
              cuplum comperi, illius quem in eadem non procul ab apogæo ſita obſer­
                <lb/>
              varam, ſed longè minorem; idem de Mercurio perigæo, quem nunquam
                <lb/>
              octuplum apogæi, idem de Marte, quem nunquam ſexagecuplum, multò
                <lb/>
              minùs octogecuplum aut
                <expan abbr="noagecuplũ">nonagecuplum</expan>
              obſervare potui, Nihil ſanè doctiſſi
                <lb/>
              morum hominum obſeruationibus & fidei
                <expan abbr="detractũ">detractum</expan>
              velim; ſed ignoſcant,
                <lb/>
              ſi oculis meis plus tribuam; vereor autem vt aliqui, vt ſyſtemati á ſe fabri­
                <lb/>
              cato, aut reformato meliùs
                <expan abbr="conſulãt">conſulant</expan>
              , ex paucis obſervationibus, iiſque præ­
                <lb/>
              ſertim, quoad minuta ſaltem ſecunda, fallaciæ haud parum obnoxiis, ea
                <lb/>
              nonnunquam adſtruant, quæ dubito, an reliquis deinde obſervationibus
                <lb/>
              ſubjaceant. </s>
              <s id="s.000930">Vnum deinde in Venere notatu dignum eſſe puto, eam ſcilicet,
                <lb/>
              cùm circa perigæum vel apogæum obſervatur, non procul abeſſe ab ho­
                <lb/>
              rizonte, ac proinde non modicam radios viſuales refractionem pati. </s>
              <s id="s.000931">quæ
                <lb/>
              hauddubie apparentem illius diametrum variabit; deſiderandum, vt Ve­
                <lb/>
              nus ſub Solis diſcum aliquando veniret, tunc enim exceptis trajectiſque
                <lb/>
              radiis ſolaribus teleſcopio, nec non projectis in planum directè
                <lb/>
              oppoſitum, vel ipſis oculis ratio diametrum Veneris ad diametrum Solis ſub­
                <lb/>
              jiceretur. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000932">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Auguſtin.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000933"> Libenter ex re reſcirem vtrùm ſit aliquod Veneris phœnome­
                <lb/>
              non; quod in tua hypotheſi explicari non poſſe putes. </s>
            </p>
            <p type="main">
              <s id="s.000934">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Antim.
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
              <s id="s.000935"> Vix crediderim vllum eſſe; de certis enim loquor & indubi­
                <lb/>
              tatis; nempe: modò ſupponam. </s>
              <s id="s.000936">Venerem ſimplici motu moveri ab ortu
                <lb/>
              ad occaſum, eoque æquabiliſſimo, cum illa duplici inclinatione, itus ac re­
                <lb/>
              ditus reciproci, ad inſtar motus accelerati & retardati; prima quidem ab
                <lb/>
              Apogæo ad diſtantiam mediam, eandem curn diſtantia media Solis, & hinc
                <lb/>
              ad Perigæum, ita vi Venus infra mediam diſtantiam orbem ſuum iſochro­
                <lb/>
              non cum Sole perficiæ ; Secunda verò ab eo latitudinis puncto, in quo </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>