Fabri, Honoré
,
Dialogi physici in quibus de motu terrae disputatur
,
1665
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
Table of figures
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 83
>
[Figure 81]
Page: 233
[Figure 82]
Page: 247
[Figure 83]
Page: 248
<
1 - 30
31 - 60
61 - 83
>
page
|<
<
of 248
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.000946
">
<
pb
pagenum
="
84
"
xlink:href
="
025/01/088.jpg
"/>
amabò circa illud centrum potiùs quàm circa aliud? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000947
">Cur non circa Solem,
<
lb
/>
qui eſt in Mundi centro? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000948
">aut ſi vis, moveri in Eclipſi, cur hanc adhibes po
<
lb
/>
tiùs quàm
<
expan
abbr
="
aliã
">aliam</
expan
>
? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000949
">cur Sol in hoc. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000950
">vmbilico,
<
expan
abbr
="
nõ
">non</
expan
>
verò in alio, vel in ipſo ellipſeos
<
lb
/>
centro? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000951
">deinde cur & vnde movetur Apogæum? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000952
">cur in conſequentia potiùs
<
lb
/>
quàm in antecedentia? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000953
">cur terra ab occaſu ad ortum, tum motu centri, tum
<
lb
/>
etiam orbis ſecundùm hemiſphærium à Sole averſum? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000954
">cur per Eclipticam
<
lb
/>
cum tanta declinatione ab Æquatore? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000955
">vnde etiam motus orbis annuus
<
lb
/>
diurno contrarius? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000956
">denique vnde ipſa vertigo Solis? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000957
">cur tanta, non major
<
lb
/>
aut minor? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000958
">Cuncta hæc,
<
expan
abbr
="
aliaq̨
">aliaque</
expan
>
; fortè ſimilia ſine vlla ratione vel cauſa exi
<
lb
/>
gente Copernicana hypotheſis habet, eo tantùm nomine, quod ad ſalvan
<
lb
/>
da phænomena, neceſſaria eſſe credantur, quæ tamen alio modo ſalvari
<
lb
/>
poſſunt. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.000959
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Auguſtin.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000960
"> Par pari haud dubiè referre poſſum: nunquid enim hæc eadęm
<
lb
/>
in veſtra hypotheſi ad ſalvanda phænomena gratis & abſque alia cauſa non
<
lb
/>
aſtruuntur? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000961
">nunquid non poniti sex centricos, epicyclos, Apogæi Nodorum
<
lb
/>
que motum? </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.000962
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Chryſec.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000963
"> Scio, à multis in noſtra hypotheſi, hæc gratis adſtrui; Anti
<
lb
/>
mus tamen noſter, vt jam non ſemel audiiſti, vno ſimplici motu æqua
<
lb
/>
bili, & gemina inclinatione illa omnia explicat, & ad ſuas cauſas re
<
lb
/>
ducit. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.000964
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Antim.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000965
"> Tuo illo argumento, Chryſocome, contra Copernicum non ſe
<
lb
/>
mel vſus ſum, re tamen paulò accuratiùs
<
expan
abbr
="
cõſiderata
">conſiderata</
expan
>
, illæ rationes, quæ meo
<
lb
/>
ſyſtemati favent, pro explicatione illorum capitum, quæ ſupra recenſuiſti,
<
lb
/>
ad Copernicanum facilè traduci poſſunt, & pro illo æquè militant. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.000966
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Auguſtin.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000967
"> Magno certè beneficio me tibi obſtringes, ſi rem hanc me do
<
lb
/>
cueris, quæ certè quanti momenti futura ſit, vix dici à me poteſt; ſi enim
<
lb
/>
Keplerus pro metis nugis & fabulis, in quibus cauſas phyſicas cæleſtium
<
lb
/>
phænomenon collocabat, tantam gloriam apud omnes obtinuit; quid de
<
lb
/>
illo faturum putas, qui veras eorundem cauſas in hac hypotheſi Copernici
<
lb
/>
ad duxerit? </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000968
">inde ſaltem maxima tua ingenuitas conſpicua & palam fiet, cùm
<
lb
/>
vel noſti arma porrigas, quibus ſe defendat. </
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
id
="
s.000969
">
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Antim.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000970
"> Libenter faciam; nec enim in hiſce diſſertationibus literariis, ali
<
lb
/>
quorum dolus mihi probatur, qui ea celant adverſarium, quæ illius cauſæ
<
lb
/>
ſuffragantur; mihi ſanè ſecus agendum eſſe puto. </
s
>
<
s
id
="
s.000971
">Itaque ſupponamus So
<
lb
/>
lem in centro mundi A ſtabulari, terram in apogæo C.circulum CHFP in
<
lb
/>
plano Eclipticæ, per quem terræ
<
expan
abbr
="
centrũmoveretur
">centrum moveretur</
expan
>
à C in N, quod vocamus
<
lb
/>
in conſequentia Signorum, ſi eſſet in mediocri, vel | connaturali diſtantia; ſed
<
lb
/>
quia ab Apogæo ad mediocrem diſtantiam tendit, ſenſim motu accelerato
<
lb
/>
accedit versùs A, ſimulque, tendit motu circulari verſus H, vnde
<
expan
abbr
="
nõ
">non</
expan
>
movetur
<
lb
/>
per arcum CH, ſed per alium CG ; ſupponamus autem AG eſſe mediocre
<
lb
/>
diſtantiam; in ea non ſiſtit; ſed motu retardato progreditur vltrà versus Peri
<
lb
/>
gæum; & quia receſſus à mediocri' diſtantia æqualis eſt acceſſui, æquali tem
<
lb
/>
pore decurret arcum GE, atque ita erit Perigæum in E, ex quo pari modo
<
lb
/>
pervenit in I, nam AI eſt mediocris diſtantia, reditque per iſochronum
<
lb
/>
receſſum, ad Apogæum C; ſive autem arcus CGE ſit ſemicirculus, vel </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>