Theodosius <Bithynius>; Clavius, Christoph, Theodosii Tripolitae Sphaericorum libri tres

Table of figures

< >
[Figure 91]
[Figure 92]
[Figure 93]
[Figure 94]
[Figure 95]
[Figure 96]
[Figure 97]
[Figure 98]
[Figure 99]
[Figure 100]
[Figure 101]
[Figure 102]
[Figure 103]
[Figure 104]
[Figure 105]
[Figure 106]
[Figure 107]
[Figure 108]
[Figure 109]
[Figure 110]
[Figure 111]
[Figure 112]
[Figure 113]
[Figure 114]
[Figure 115]
[Figure 116]
[Figure 117]
[Figure 118]
[Figure 119]
[Figure 120]
< >
page |< < (83) of 532 > >|
9583& ex K I, ſumatur K N, ipſi M L, æqualis; & per N, & A, circulus maximus
deſeribatur A O N, ſecans circulum C D, &
in O. Deinde per lemma 2. præ-
1110. 1. huius. cedentis propoſ.
inueniatur arcus F P, maior quidem, quàm F O, minor ve-
101[Figure 101] rò quàm F E, &
ipſi F G, commenſurabilis:
ſitque G Q, ipſi F P, (qui minor eſt, quàm
E F, atque adeo minor etiam quàm G H, ip-
ſi E F, æqualis.)
æqualis: & per P, Q, & A,
circuli maximi deſcribantur A P R, A Q S.

2220. 1. huius Quoniam igitur arcus P F, G Q, æquales
ſunt non continui, eſtq́ue vtrique illorum
commenſurabilis arcus intermedius F G;
erit,
vt demon ſtratum iam eſt in prima ſigura, ar-
cus S L, maior arcu K R.
Igitur & multo
maior erit, quàm K N;
ac proinde & M L, mul
to maior erit, quàm K N:
Sed & K N, ipſi
M L, æqualis poſitus eſt.
Quod eſt abſurdum. Non ergo M L, minor eſt
quàm K I.
SIT deinde, ſi fieri poteſt, arcus M L, æqualis arcui K I, vt in tertia figura.
Diuiſis autẽ arcubus E F, G H, bifariã in N, O, deſcribantur per N, O, & A, cir
3320. 1. huius culi maximi A N P, A O Q.
Erit igitur arcus M Q, maior arcu Q L, & K P,
102[Figure 102]446. huius. maior quàm P I.
Quare Q L, minor erit, quàm
dimidiũ ipſius M L;
& K P, maior, quàm dimi-
dium ipſius K I.
Cum ergo M L, K I, ponãtur
æquales;
erit Q L, minor, quàm K P, quod eſt
abſurdum.
Quoniam enim arcus F N, G O,
dimidij æqualium arcuum E F, G H, æquales
ſunt non continui, non poterit Q L, minor
eſſe, quàm K B;
vt proximè in ſecunda figura
demonſtratum eſt.
Non ergo arcus M L, ar-
cui K I, æqualis eſt:
ſed neque minor eſt oſten
ſus.
Maior ergo eſt. Si igitur polus paralle-
lorum ſit in circunferentia, &
c. Quod erat
demonſtrandum.
SCHOLIVM.
_SICVT_ Theodoſius in hac propoſitione 9. idem demonſtrauit de arcubus non
continuis, quod de continuis propoſ.
6. docuit, ita in alia verſione demonſtrantur tris
bus Theorematibus eadem de arcubus non continuis, quæ Theodoſius de continuis de-
monſtrauit propoſ.
5. 7. & 8. Primum autem theorema eiuſmodi eſt.
I.
SI polus parallelorum ſit in circunferentia maximi circuli, quem
557. duo alij maximi circuli ad angulos rectos ſecẽt, quorum circulorum
alter ſit vnus parallelorum, alter verò ad parallelos obliquus ſit, &
ab
hoc obliquo circulo ſumantur æquales circunferentię, quę continuę
quidem non ſint, ſed tamen ſint ad eaſdem partes maximi illius

Text layer

  • Dictionary

Text normalization

  • Original
  • Regularized
  • Normalized

Search


  • Exact
  • All forms
  • Fulltext index
  • Morphological index