Fabri, Honoré, Tractatus physicus de motu locali, 1646

Page concordance

< >
Scan Original
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
< >
page |< < of 491 > >|
    <archimedes>
      <text>
        <body>
          <chap id="N1137F">
            <pb pagenum="64" xlink:href="026/01/096.jpg"/>
            <p id="N15170" type="main">
              <s id="N15172">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              124.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1517E" type="main">
              <s id="N15180">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Non determinatur noua linea in motu reflexo â priore tantùm linea
                <lb/>
              incidentiæ
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; probatur, quia poteſt eſſe eadem linea incidentiæ cum di­
                <lb/>
              uerſis lineis motus reflexi, vt patet. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1518D" type="main">
              <s id="N1518F">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              125.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N1519B" type="main">
              <s id="N1519D">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Non determinatur noua linea motus reflexi ratione tantùm plani reflecten­
                <lb/>
              tis
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              : Probatur, quia cum eodem plano reflectente diuerſæ lineæ motus
                <lb/>
              reflexi eſſe poſſunt, vt conſtat. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N151AA" type="main">
              <s id="N151AC">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              126.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N151B8" type="main">
              <s id="N151BA">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Determinatur noua linea motus reflexi ratione lineæ prioris incidentiæ com­
                <lb/>
              paratæ cum plano reflectente,
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              eſt enim angulus reflexionis æqualis angu­
                <lb/>
              lo incidentiæ, cuius effectus rationem aliàs afferemus, cum de motu
                <lb/>
              reflexo; </s>
              <s id="N151C9">& verò multa hîc curſim tantùm perſtringimus, quæ in libro
                <lb/>
              de motu reflexo accuratiſſimè demonſtrabimus; Hìc tantùm dixiſſe ſuf­
                <lb/>
              ficiat determinari mobile in reflexionis puncto ad nouam lineam motus,
                <lb/>
              quod nemo in dubium reuocare poteſt, & propter quid fiat loco citato
                <lb/>
              demonſtrabimus. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N151D5" type="main">
              <s id="N151D7">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              127.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N151E3" type="main">
              <s id="N151E5">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Quando globus in globum æqualem ita impingitur, vt linea directionis per
                <lb/>
              centra vtriuſque ducatur, determinatio noua eſt æqualis priori
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; </s>
              <s id="N151F0">Patet ex­
                <lb/>
              perientia in pilis illis eburneis, quas deſiderat ludus minoris tudiculæ; </s>
              <s id="N151F6">
                <lb/>
              nec eſt vlla ratio, cur determinatio ſit maior potiùs, quàm minor, cum
                <lb/>
              vtraque pila ſit æqualis; </s>
              <s id="N151FD">ſi enim maior eſſet, vel minor; cur potiùs vno
                <lb/>
              gradu, quàm duobus? </s>
              <s id="N15203">quàm tribus? </s>
              <s id="N15206">Præterea, cum reſiſtens, vel im­
                <lb/>
              pediens eſt æquale agenti; </s>
              <s id="N1520C">certe ſicut agens refundit in paſſum totum
                <lb/>
              id, quod habet, id eſt æqualem impetum in intenſione, & æquè velo­
                <lb/>
              cem motum per Th. 60. Ita reſiſtens, vel impediens refundit æquale
                <lb/>
              impedimentum, quod tantùm ſumi poteſt ex æqualitate mobilium; </s>
              <s id="N15218">ſed
                <lb/>
              ex æquali impedimento duci tantùm poteſt æqualis determinatio priori;
                <lb/>
              denique poteſt dari determinatio noua æqualis priori, vt conſtat, ſed
                <lb/>
              aliunde duci non poteſt quàm ex ipſa mobilium æqualitate, modò fiat
                <lb/>
              contactus per lineam connectentem centra. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N15224" type="main">
              <s id="N15226">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              128.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N15232" type="main">
              <s id="N15234">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Hinc ratio manifeſta illius mirifici effectus, ſcilicet quietis pilæ impactæ
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              ; </s>
              <s id="N1523D">
                <lb/>
              quippe hæc quieſcet illicò ab ictu; </s>
              <s id="N15242">quia ſcilicet, cum noua determina­
                <lb/>
              tio ſit æqualis priori, non eſt vlla ratio, cur alterutra præualeat; </s>
              <s id="N15248">nec
                <lb/>
              etiam poteſt eſſe determinatio communis, ſeu mixta; cur enim potius
                <lb/>
              dextrorſum quam ſiniſtrorſum? </s>
              <s id="N15250">de quo infrà. </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N15253" type="main">
              <s id="N15255">
                <emph type="center"/>
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Theorema
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              129.
                <emph.end type="center"/>
              </s>
            </p>
            <p id="N15261" type="main">
              <s id="N15263">
                <emph type="italics"/>
              Quando linea directionis globi impacti non connectit centra vtriuſquę
                <lb/>
              globi, determinatur noua linea motus tùm à priore linea incidentiæ, tùm à
                <lb/>
              connectente centra, quæ ſcilicet per punctum contactus à centro impacti globi
                <emph.end type="italics"/>
              </s>
            </p>
          </chap>
        </body>
      </text>
    </archimedes>
Impressum