Castelli, Benedetto
,
Of the mensuration of running waters
,
1661
Text
Text Image
Image
XML
Thumbnail overview
Document information
None
Concordance
Figures
Thumbnails
List of thumbnails
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 137
>
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
<
1 - 10
11 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
41 - 50
51 - 60
61 - 70
71 - 80
81 - 90
91 - 100
101 - 110
111 - 120
121 - 130
131 - 137
>
page
|<
<
of 137
>
>|
<
archimedes
>
<
text
>
<
body
>
<
chap
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>
<
pb
xlink:href
="
068/01/099.jpg
"
pagenum
="
85
"/>
he ſhall plainly ſee, who ſhall have underſtood my Book of the
<
lb
/>
Meaſure of Running Waters And this was the Reaſon why all
<
lb
/>
the Countrey did grow dry upon the opening of the Mouth into
<
lb
/>
the Sea. </
s
>
<
s
>And here I propoſe to conſideration that which the Pea
<
lb
/>
ſants about
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Piſa
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
relate, namely, That the Water in the Fields
<
lb
/>
doth no conſiderable harm by continuing there five or ſix, yea, or
<
lb
/>
eight dayes. </
s
>
<
s
>And therefore the work of the Countrey is to o
<
lb
/>
pen the Mouth of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Fiume morto,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
in ſuch manner, that the Water
<
lb
/>
being come, they may have the Trench free and ready, when that
<
lb
/>
the Water cometh it may have a free drain, and may not ſtay
<
lb
/>
there above eight or nine dayes, for then the overflowings be
<
lb
/>
come hurtful. </
s
>
<
s
>It is to be deſired alſo, that if any Propoſition is
<
lb
/>
produced touching theſe affairs, it might be propounded the moſt
<
lb
/>
diſtinctly that may be poſſible, and not conſiſt in generals, eſpe
<
lb
/>
cially when the Diſpute is of the riſings, of velocity, of tardity,
<
lb
/>
of much and little water; things that are all to be ſpecified by
<
lb
/>
meaſures.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>6. Your Letter ſaith, in the next place, that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Signore Barto
<
lb
/>
lotti
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
confeſſeth, that if the Mouth of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Fiume morto
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
might al
<
lb
/>
wayes be kept open, it would be better to let it continue as it is:
<
lb
/>
the which, that I may not yield to him in courteſie, I confeſſe,
<
lb
/>
for the keeping it ſtopt on all ſides would be a thing moſt per
<
lb
/>
nicious. </
s
>
<
s
>But admitting of his confeſſion I again reply, that
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Fi
<
lb
/>
ume morto
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
ought not to be let into
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Serchio,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
but immediately in
<
lb
/>
to the Sea; becauſe although ſometimes the Mouth to Sea
<
lb
/>
wards be ſtopt up, yet for all that, the raiſing of the Bank above
<
lb
/>
the Plains (which is all the buſineſſe of importance) ſhall be ever
<
lb
/>
leſſer, if we make uſe of the Mouth leading to the Sea, than u
<
lb
/>
ſing that of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Serchio.
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>7. I will not omit to mention a kinde of ſcruple that I have
<
lb
/>
concerning the poſition of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Sign. </
s
>
<
s
>Bartolotti,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
that is, where he ſaith
<
lb
/>
that the two Mouths A and D are equal to the like Mouths into
<
lb
/>
the Sea; Now it ſeems to me, that the Mouth A of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Fiume morto
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
<
lb
/>
into
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Serchio
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
is abſolutely within
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Serchio,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
nor can it be made low
<
lb
/>
er, and is regulated by the height of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Serchio
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
: But the Mouth
<
lb
/>
of
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Fiume morto
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
terminates, and ought to be underſtood to ter
<
lb
/>
minate in the Sea it ſelf, the loweſt place. </
s
>
<
s
>And this I believe
<
lb
/>
was very well peroeived by
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Sig. </
s
>
<
s
>Bartolotti,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
but I cannot tell why
<
lb
/>
he paſt it over without declaring it: and we ſee not that the
<
lb
/>
Mouth D falleth far from the Sea, which Mouth ought to be let
<
lb
/>
into the Sea it ſelf, and ſo the advantage of the
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
M
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
outh into the
<
lb
/>
Sea more clearly appeareth.</
s
>
</
p
>
<
p
type
="
main
">
<
s
>8. That which
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Sig. </
s
>
<
s
>Bartolotti
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
addeth, that when it is high
<
lb
/>
Waters, at ſuch time as the Waters are out, and when Winds
<
lb
/>
choak up
<
emph
type
="
italics
"/>
Fiume morto,
<
emph.end
type
="
italics
"/>
they not only retard it, but return the </
s
>
</
p
>
</
chap
>
</
body
>
</
text
>
</
archimedes
>